Prior research on the relationship between loss contingency disclosures and equity market parameters implies that such disclosures may provide useful information to equity market participants. However, there is no empirical evidence on the relationship between loss contingency data and bond market parameters. Using methods from continuous-finance theory, we model risk premiums on new issues as a function of default risk, issue traits, the risk-free rate, the severity level of loss contingency disclosures, and the frequency of such disclosures. Our results imply that both the severity-level and frequency of reported contingencies are positively related to the magnitude of risk premiums assessed on new bond issues. In economic terms, a one-unit increase in the severity level of a contingency disclosure increases the yield premium by 0.034 percentage points. Similarly, each additional contingency reported by the firm during our sample period increased the yield premium by 0.305 percentage points.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abdel-KhalikA. R.ThompsonR. B.ChenR. D.. 1981. “Effects on Bond Pricing and on Bond Rating.” In The Economic Effects on Leases of FASB No. 13, A. R. Abdel-khalik, principal researcher, Stamford, Conn.: Financial Accounting Standards Board, 163–191.
2.
AICPA. 1991. Accounting Trends and Techniques: Annual Survey of Accounting Practices Followed in 600 Stockholders' Reports. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
3.
AICPA. 1992. Accounting Trends and Techniques: Annual Survey of Accounting Practices Followed in 600 Stockholders' Reports. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
4.
AICPA. 1993. Accounting Trends and Techniques: Annual Survey of Accounting Practices Followed in 600 Stockholders' Reports. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
5.
AICPA. 1995. Proposed Statement of Position: Environmental Remediation Liabilities. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
6.
AldermanC. W.1977. “The Role of Uncertainty Qualifications.”Journal of Accountancy (November): 97–100.
7.
Auditing Standards Board. 1985. Amendment to Statement on Auditing Standards No. 58, Reports on Audited Financial Statements: Statement on Auditing Standards No. 79. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
8.
Auditing Standards Board. 1988. Reports on Audited Financial Statements: Statement on Auditing Standards No. 58. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
BanksD. W.KinneyW.Jr.1982. “Loss Contingency Reports and Stock Prices: An Empirical Study.”Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 240–254.
11.
BelsleyD. A.KuhE.WelschR. E.. 1980. Regression Diagnostics. New York: Wiley.
12.
BhagattS.MarrM. W.. 1985. “The Rule 415 Experiment: Equity Markets.”Journal of Finance (December): 1385–1401.
13.
BlackF.CoxJ. C.. 1976. “Valuing Corporate Securities: Some Effects of Bond Indenture Provisions.”The Journal of Finance (May): 351–368.
14.
BlackF.ScholesM.. 1973. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.”Journal of Political Economy (May–June): 637–654.
15.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 1995. “Financial and Business Statistics.”Federal Reserve Bulletin81 (September): A35.
16.
ChewningG.PanyK.WheelerS.. 1989. “Auditor Reporting Decisions Involving Accounting Principle Changes: Some Evidence on Materiality Thresholds.”Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 78–96.
17.
CookT. Q.HendershottP. H.. 1978. “The Impact of Taxes, Risk and Relative Security Supplies on Interest Rate Differentials.”Journal of Finance (September): 1173–1186.
18.
DoddP.DopuchN.HolthausenR. W.LeftwichR. W.. 1984. “Qualified Audit Opinions and Stock Prices: Information Content, Announcement Dates, and Concurrent Disclosures.”Journal of Accounting and Economics (January): 3–38.
19.
DopuchN.HolthausenR. W.LeftwichR. W.. 1987. “Predicting Audit Qualifications with Financial and Market Variables.”The Accounting Review (July): 431–454.
20.
EderingtonL.1974. “The Yield Spread on New Issues of Corporate Bonds.”Journal of Finance (December): 1531–1543.
21.
FASB. 1975. Accounting for Contingencies: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5. Stamford, Conn.: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
22.
FASB. 1978. Objectives of Financial Reporting by Business Enterprises: Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 1. Stamford, Conn.: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
23.
FASB. 1990. Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 105. Stamford, Conn.: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
24.
FinnertyJ. E.OliverT. W.. 1985. “The Impact of Qualified Audit Opinions on Systematic Risk.”Advances in Financial Planning and Forecasting1: 293–305.
25.
FisherL.1959. “Determinants of Risk Premiums on Corporate Bonds.”Journal of Political Economy (May/June): 217–237.
26.
FisherL.1966. “Some New Stock-Market Indexes.”Journal of Business (January): 191–225.
27.
FrostC.1991. “Loss Contingency Reports and Stock Prices: A Replication and Extension of Banks and Kinney.”Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 157–169.
28.
FungW. K. H.RuddA.. 1986. “Pricing New Corporate Bond Issues: An Analysis of Issue Cost and Seasoning Effects.”Journal of Finance July: 633–644.
29.
GoldfeldS.QuandtR.. 1965. “Some Tests for Homoskedasticity.”Journal of the American Statistical Association (June): 539–547.
30.
HoT.SingerR. F.. 1984. “The Value of Corporate Debt With a Sinking Fund Provision.”Journal of Business (July): 315–336.
31.
HolstrumG. L.MessierW. F.. 1982. “A Review and Integration of Empirical Research on Materiality.”Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Fall): 45–63.
32.
JonesP. E.MasonS.RosenfieldE.. 1984. “Contingent Claims Analysis of Corporate Capital Structures: An Empirical Investigation.”Journal of Finance (June): 611–627.
33.
KesserR.1971. “A Study of the Effects of Competition in the Tax-Exempt Bond Market.”Journal of Political Economy (July-August): 706–738.
34.
KidwelD. S.MarrM. W.ThompsonG. R.. 1984. “SEC Rule 415: The Ultimate Competitive Bid.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (June): 183–195.
35.
KirkR. F.1982. Experimental Design. New York: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
36.
LindvallJ. R.1977. “New Issue Corporate Bonds, Seasoned Market Efficiency and Yield Spreads.”Journal of Finance (September): 1057–1067.
37.
MertonR.1974. “On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates.”Journal of Finance (May): 449–470.
38.
MonroeG. S.TehS. T.. 1993. “Predicting Uncertainty Audit Qualifications in Australia Using Publicly Available Information.”Accounting and Finance (November): 79–106.
NeterJ.WassermanW.. 1974. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin.
41.
OgdenJ. R.1987. “Determinants of the Ratings and Yields on Corporate Bonds: Tests of the Contingent Claims Model.”The Journal of Financial Research (Winter): 329–339.
42.
PrakashK.ChandyP. R.. 1991. “Risk Premium in Corporate Bonds.”Akron Business and Economic Review (Spring): 92–107.
43.
ReiterS.1990. “The Use of Bond Market Data in Accounting Research.”Journal of Accounting Literature9: 183–228.
44.
ReiterS.1991. “Pension Obligation and the Determination of Bond Risk Premiums: Evidence from the Electric Industry.”Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (November): 833–859.
45.
RobertsG.ViscioneJ.. 1984. “The Impact of Seniority and Security Covenants on Bond Yields: A Note.”Journal of Finance (December): 1597–1603.
46.
Securities and Exchange Commission Accounting Rules. 1988. SEC Financial Reporting Release # 36. New York: Commerce Clearing House.
47.
SorensonE. H.1979. “The Impact of Underwriting Method and Bidder Competition Upon Rate Bond Interest Cost.”Journal of Finance (September): 863–870.
48.
Van HorneJ. C.1990. “Option Type Instruments.”Financial Market Rates and Flows. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
49.
WeinsteinM.1978. “The Seasoning Process of New Corporate Bond Issues.”Journal of Finance (December): 1343–1354.
