Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study explains the cross-sectional variation in firms' selected assumptions (discount rates and health care cost trend rates) used to measure the obligation for postretirement benefits other than pensions (PRB) under SFAS No. 106. Our aim is to examine whether managements manage the reported PRB by choosing either too conservative or too aggressive estimation parameters. In addition, we examine whether investors value the firm's equity based on the cross-section median parameters or based on each firm's selected parameters. We find that firms with relatively larger PRB obligation and more leverage tend to select more aggressive (obligation-reducing) estimation parameters. We also find that firms that amended their PRB plans and firms with extreme earnings-price ratios tend to select more conservative (obligation-increasing) estimation parameters. Finally, we find that investors value the firm's equity using reported rather than adjusted estimation parameters.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amir

1993. “The Market Valuation of Accounting Information: The Case of Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions.” The Accounting Review (October): 703–724.

Amir

Lev

1996. “Value-Relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Wireless Communications Industry.” Working paper. New York: Columbia University and New York University.

Amir

Ziv

1996. “Recognition, Disclosure or Delay: Timing the Adoption of SFAS 106.” Working paper. New York: Columbia University.

Bartov

1993. “The Timing of Assets Sales and Earnings Manipulations.” The Accounting Review (October): 840–855.

Begley

1990. “Debt Covenants and Accounting Choice.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 12 (January): 125–140.

Bulow

1979. “Analysis of Pension Funding Under ERISA.” Working paper no. 402. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).

D'Souza

1994. “Rate-Regulated Enterprises and Mandated Accounting Changes: The Case of Electric Utilities and SFAS 106.” Working paper. Evanston: Northwestern University.

Duke

J. C.

Hunt

H. G.

III

1990. “An Empirical Examination of Debt Covenant Restrictions and Accounting-Related Debt Proxies.” Journal of Accounting and Economics (January): 45–63.

Fama

French

1992. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance (June): 427–465.

10.

Feldstein

Morck

1983. “Pension Funding Decisions, Interest Rate Assumptions and Share Prices.” In Bodie

Zvi

Shoven

John B.

, eds., Financial Aspects of the United States Pension System, pp. 177–207. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

11.

Feltham

G. A.

Ohlson

J. A.

1995. “Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting For Operating and Financial Activities.” Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (Spring): 689–732.

12.

Financial Accounting Standards Board. 1985. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87: Employers' Accounting for Pensions. Stamford, Conn.: FASB.

13.

Feltham

G. A.

Ohlson

J. A.

1990. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106: Employers' Accounting for Post-Retirement Benefits Other than Pensions. Norwalk, Conn.: FASB.

14.

Godwin

J. H.

Goldberg

S. R.

Duchac

J. E.

1995. “An Empirical Analysis of Factors Associated with Changes in Pension Plan Interest Rate Assumptions.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 11 (Spring): 305–322.

15.

Hayn

1995. “The Information Content of Losses.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (September): 125–154.

16.

Healy

1985. “The Impact of Bonus Schemes on the Selection of Accounting Principles.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 7–107.

17.

Landsman

1986. “An Empirical Investigation of Pension Fund Property Rights.” The Accounting Review 61 (October): 662–691.

18.

Liu

Ryan

1995. “The Effect of Bank Loan Portfolio Composition on the Market Reaction to and Anticipation of Provision for Loan Losses.” Journal of Accounting Research 33 (Spring): 77–94.

19.

Myers

S. C.

1983. “A Comment on Pension Funding Decisions, Interest Rate Assumptions and Share Prices by Feldstein, M., and R. Morck.” In Bodie

Zvi

Shoven

John B.

, eds., Financial Aspects of the United States Pension System, pp. 207–210. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

20.

McNichols

Wilson

G. P.

1988. “Evidence of Earnings Management from the Provision for Bad Debts.” Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement): 1–32.

21.

Press

E. G.

Weintrop

J. B.

1990. “Accounting Based Constraints in Public and Private Debt Agreements: Their Association with Leverage and Impact on Accounting Choice.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 12 (January): 65–96.

22.

Thomas

1989. “Why Do Firms Terminate Overfunded Pension Plans?” Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (November): 361–398.

Firms' Choice of Estimation Parameters: Empirical Evidence from SFAS No. 106

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References