The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) uses a due process to ascertain the views of its constituents and to build consensus while setting standards based on a sound conceptual framework. This study examines the responsiveness of the FASB and its success in building consensus among corporations in the due process on Employers' Accounting for Pensions. The findings indicate that the FASB is influenced by the number of opposing comments filed by its corporate constituents. Further, there is evidence that consensus was built throughout the due process for the highly controversial standard.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlreckP. L.SettleR. B.. 1985. The Survey Research Handbook. Homewood, IL: Irwin, Inc.
2.
BrownP. R.1982. “FASB Responsiveness to Corporate Input”. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance (Summer): 282–290.
3.
BrownP. R.1981. “A Descriptive Analysis of Select Input Bases of the Financial Accounting Standards Board”. Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 232–246.
4.
BrownL. D.FerozE. H.. 1992. “Does the FASB Listen to Corporations?”Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting (September): 715–729.
5.
Financial Accounting Standards Board.1981. Discussion Memorandum: Employers' Accounting for Pensions and Other Postemployment Benefits. Stamford: Financial Accounting Standards Board (February).
FrancisJ. R.1987. “Lobbying Against Proposed Accounting Standards: The Case of Employers' Pension Accounting”. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 6: 35–37.
9.
HaringJ. R.Jr. 1979. “Accounting Rules and ‘The Accounting Establishment.’”Journal of Business, 52 (No. 4): 507–519.
10.
KellyL.1982. “Corporate Lobbying and Changes in Financing or Operating Activities in Reaction to FAS No. 8”. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy (Winter): 153–173.
11.
KirkD. J.1981. “Concepts, Consensus, Compromise and Consequences: Their Roles in Standard Setting”. Journal of Accountancy (April): 83–86.
12.
PrevitsG. J.MerinoB. D.. 1979. A History of Accounting in America. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
13.
SiegelS.CastellanN. J.Jr. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
