Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study is the second to provide a richer test of the association between auditor size and audit fees by using three audit firm size classes in the small-client segment of the U.S. audit market. The finding of a Big 8 (now Big 6) price premium is consistent with Francis and Simon [1]. However, this price premium exists only with respect to local/regional firms. Francis und Simon showed that the Big 8 price premium exists with respect to both second-tier and local/regional firms. The present study also provides evidence of a second-tier price premium over local/regional firms. The results imply product differentiation to both Big 8 and second-tier firms. Plausible reasons for differences in results between the two studies are given.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Francis

Simon

, “A Test of Audit Pricing in the Small-Client Segment of the U.S. Audit Market”. The Accounting Review, 62, no. 1 (1987): 145–157.

Palmrose

, “Audit Fees and Auditor Size: Further Evidence”. Journal of Accounting Research, 24, no. 1 (Spring 1986): 97–110.

Simunic

, “The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence”. Journal of Accounting Research, 18, no. 1 (Spring 1980): 161–190.

Francis

Stokes

, “Audit Prices, Product Differentiation and Scale Economies: Further Evidence from the Australian Market”. Journal of Accounting Research, 24, no. 2 (Autumn 1986): 383–393.

Francis

, “The Effect of Audit Firm Size on Audit Prices: A Study of the Australian Market”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6, no. 2 (March 1984): 133–151.

Standard and Poor's Register of Corporations, Directors, and Executives. Vols. 1 and 3. New York: Standard and Poor's Corporation. 1983–1985.

Harris

. Who Audits America. Menlo Park, Calif.: Data Financial Press, 1983–1985.

Wallace

, “Internal Auditors Can Cut Outside CPA Costs”. Harvard Business Review, 62 (March/April 1984): 16, 20.

Danos

Eichenseher

, “Audit Industry Dynamics: Factors Affecting Changes in Client-Industry Market Shares”. Journal of Accounting Research, 20 (Autumn 1982): 604–616.

10.

Danos

Eichenseher

, “Long-Term Trends Toward Seller Concentration in the U.S. Audit Market”. The Accounting Review, 61 (October 1986): 633–650.

11.

Eichenseher

Danos

, “The Analysis of Industry Specific Auditor Concentration: Towards an Explanatory Model”. The Accounting Review, 56 (July 1981): 479–492.

12.

Goldfeld

Quandt

. “Some Tests for Homoscedasticity”. Journal of the American Statistical Association (June 1965): 539–547.

13.

Stevens

. The Accounting Wars. New York: Macmillan, 1985.

A Test of Audit Pricing in the Small-Client Segment: A Comment

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References