Accounting Principles Board. 1966. Opinion No. 8: Accounting for the Costs of Pension Plans.New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
2.
AyresF. L.1986. “Characteristics of Firms Selecting Early Adoption of SFAS 52.”Journal of Accounting and Economics8 (2): 147–158.
3.
BallR.FosterG.1982. “Corporate Financial Reporting; A Methodological Review of Empirical Research.”Journal of Accounting Research20 (Supplement): 161–234.
4.
BeaverW. P.KettlerP.ScholesM.1970. “The Association Between Market Determined and Accounting Determined Risk Measures.”The Accounting Review45 (October): 654–682.
5.
FASB. 1982. Preliminary Views of the Financial Acounting Standards Board on Major Issues Related to Employers' Accounting for Pension and Other Postemployment Benefits.Stamford: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
6.
FASB. 1985. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87: Employers' Accounting for Pensions.Stamford: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
7.
FrancisJ. R.1987. “Lobbying Against Proposed Accounting Standards: The Case of Employers' Pension Accounting.”Journal of Accounting and Public Policy6 (3): 35–57.
8.
MosesD.1987. “Income Smoothing and Incentives: Empirical Tests Using Accounting Changes.”The Accounting Review62 (April): 358–377.
9.
NdubizuO.1987. “Management Preferences for Foreign Currency Standards: An Empirical Analysis.”The International Journal of Accounting, pp. 115–130.
10.
NdubizuG.1990. “Earnings Volatility and the Corporate Adoption Decision on SFAS No. 52: An Empirical Analysis.”Advances in International Accounting3: 173–188.
11.
OlsonT.1971. The Logic of Collective Action.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12.
SuttonT.1984. “Lobbying of Accounting Standard-Setting Bodies in the U.K. and the U.S.A.: A Downsian Analysis.”Accounting, Organizations, and Society9 (1): 81–95.