The scaling constant of multiattribute utility functions derived for each of 15 practicing auditors was used to measure risk attitude for the subjects. The risk preference or risk aversion indicated by this metric allowed categorization of the auditors to test for an effect of risk attitude on audit judgments. The sample showed both risk aversion and risk preference among the auditors. The correlations among auditor evaluations of hypothetical internal control compliance test results were generally high and were different for audit seniors than for audit managers. Risk attitude was not found to explain the differences across rank nor the individual differences in consensus.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1986. Codification of Statement on Auditing Standards.New York: AICPA.
2.
AshtonRobert H.1974. “An Experimental Study of Internal Control Judgments.”Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 143–157.
3.
AshtonRobert H.BrownP. R.1980. “Descriptive Modeling of Auditors' Internal Control Judgments.”Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 269–277.
4.
BarronF. Hutton1980. “Empirical Validation of Elicited Utilities for Prediction and Decision Making.”Decision Sciences411–424.
5.
BarronF. Hutton1983. “Validations and Error in Multiplicative Utility Functions.”Acta Psychologica..
6.
BarronHuttonF.PersonHenry B.1979. “Assessment of Multiplicative Utility Functions Via Holistic Judgments.”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance147–166.
7.
BarronF. Huttonvon WinterfeldtDetlofFischerGregory W.1984. “Empirical and Theoretical Relationships Between Value and Utility Functions.”Acta Psychologica233–244.
8.
BehlingOrlandoDillardJesse F.1984. “A Problem in Data Analysis: Implications for Organizational Behavior Research.”Academy of Management Review37–46.
9.
BehlingOrlandoDillardJesse F.GiffordWilliam E.1979. “Test of Expectancy Theory Predictions of Effort: A Simulation Study Comparing Simple and Complex Models.”Journal of Business Research331–347.
10.
BiggsStanley F.MockTheodore J.1983. “An Investigation of Auditor Decision Processes in the Evaluation of Internal Controls and Audit Scope Decisions.”Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 234–255.
11.
DawesR. M.CorriganB.1974. “Linear Models in Decision Making.”Psychological Bulletin81: 95–106.
12.
EinhornHillel J.1976. “Equal Weighting in Multi-Attribute Models: A Rationale, An Example and Some Extensions.” In Proceedings of the Conference on Topical Research in Accounting, edited by SchiffSorter, 1–13. New York: New York University Press.
13.
FischerGregory W.1977. “Convergent Validation of Decomposed Multi-Attribute Utility Assessment Procedures for Risky and Riskless Decisions.”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance295–315.
14.
FischerGregory W.1979. “Utility Models for Multiple Objective Decisions: Do They Accurately Represent Human Preferences?”Decision Sciences451–479.
15.
GaumnitzBruce R.NunamakerThomasSurdickJohn J.ThomasMichael F.1982. “Auditor Consensus in Internal Control Evaluation and Audit Program Planning.”Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn, Part II): 745–755.
16.
HamiltonRobert E.WrightWilliam F.1982. “Internal Control Judgments and Effects of Experience: Replications and Extensions.”Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn, Part II): 756–765.
17.
HannanEdward L.SmithJoseph A.GilbertRonald G.1983. “A Multiattribute Decision-Making Approach to the Selection of An Auxiliary Device for Icebreakers.”Decision Sciences14: 240–252.
JoyceEdward J.1976. “Expert Judgment in Audit Program Planning.”Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement): 29–60.
20.
KeeneyRalph L.1973. “A Decision Analysis with Multiple Objectives: The Mexico City Airport.”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science101–117.
21.
KeeneyRalph L.RaiffaHoward1976. Decisions With Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.New York: Wiley.
22.
MiddaughJack KendallII1981. Application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory in a Capital Budgeting Context. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
23.
von NeumannJohnMorgensternOskar1953. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior.Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
24.
WrightWilliam F.1988. “Audit Judgment Consensus and Experience.” In Behavioral Accounting Research: A Critical Analysis, edited by FerrisKenneth R., 305–328. Columbus, Ohio: Century VII Publishing Co.
