American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, The Commission on Auditors' Responsibilities: Conclusions and Recommendations. AICPA, 1978.
2.
“Changes Continue at Record Pace: Arthur Young the Big Winner,”Public Accounting Report (January 1986), p. 3.
3.
KlottGary, “Auditors Feel the Heat of a New Scrutiny,”New York Times (May 13, 1984), Section C, pp. 1 and 26.
4.
Laventhol & Horwath, “Investor Protection Is Reason for SEC's ‘Opinion Shopping’ Proposals,”Laventhol & Horwath SEC Newsletter (November-December 1985), p. 1.
5.
WeissStewart, “Saying No to Shopping for Yes-Man CPAs,”Business Week (May 13, 1985), pp. 128 and 130.
6.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, “SEC to Study Opinion Shopping,”The CPA Letter (July 1985), p. 6.
7.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, “Accounting Function in Spotlight,”The CPA Letter (November 12, 1984), p. 5.
8.
SchwartzKenneth B.MenonKrishnagopal, “Auditor Switches by Failing Firms,”Accounting Review (April 1985), pp. 248–261.
9.
FriedDovSchiffAllen, “CPA Switches and Associated Market Reactions,”Accounting Review (April 1981), pp. 326–341.
10.
LevBaruch, “Discussion of the Predictive Power of Limited Information in Preliminary Analytical Review: An Empirical Review,”Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement 1979), pp. 166–168.
11.
SterlingRobert, “Accounting Power,”Journal of Accountancy (January 1973), pp. 61–67.
12.
DeAngeloLinda E., “Auditor Size and Auditor Quality,”Journal of Accounting and Economics (December 1981), pp. 183–199.
13.
PaulyDavid, “Who Will Audit the Auditors?”Newsweek (December 3, 1984), p. 72.
14.
ShockleyRandolph A., “Perceptions of Auditor Independence: An Empirical Analysis,”The Accounting Review (October 1981), pp. 785–800.
15.
Arthur Young & Company, Financial Reporting and Accounting: 1985 Update. Arthur Young & Company, 1985.
16.
IngersollBruce, “SEC Warns Accountants, Public Firms against ‘Shopping’ for Audit Opinions,”The Wall Street Journal (April 18, 1985), p. 7.
17.
AICPA, Auditing Standards Board, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 7, Communications between Predecessor and Successor Auditors, 1975.
18.
AICPA, Auditing Standards Board, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 50, Reports on the Application of Accounting Principles, 1986.
19.
Securities and Exchange Commission, Accounting Series Release No. 165, Notice of Amendments to Require Increased Disclosure of Relationships between Registrants and Their Independent Public Accountants. Commerce Clearing House, 1974.
20.
Securities and Exchange Commission, Accounting Series Release No. 194, Reporting Disagreements with Former Accountants—Adoption of Amendments of Requirements. Commerce Clearing House, 1976.
21.
Securities and Exchange Commission, Accounting Series Release No. 247, Auditor Changes. Commerce Clearing House, 1978.
22.
BurtonJohn C.RobertsWilliam, “A Study of Auditor Changes,”Journal of Accountancy (April 1967), pp. 31–36.
23.
BedingfieldJames P.LoebStephen E., “Auditor Changes—An Examination,”Journal of Accountancy (March 1974), pp. 66–69.
24.
EichenseherJohn W.ShieldsDavid, “The Correlates of CPA-Firm Change for Publicly-Held Corporations,”Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Spring 1983), pp. 23–37.
25.
BuchmanThomas A.TracyJohn A., “Obtaining Responses to Sensitive Questions: Conventional Questionnaire versus Randomized Response Technique,”Journal of Accounting Research (Spring 1982), pp. 263–271.
26.
McConnellDonald K., “Auditor Changes and Related Disagreements,”Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Spring 1984), pp. 44–56.
27.
ChowChee W.RiceSteven J., “Qualified Audit Opinions and Auditor Switching,”Accounting Review (April 1982), pp. 326–335.
28.
FirthMichael, “A Note on the Impact of Audit Qualifications on Lending and Credit Decisions,”Journal of Banking and Finance (September 1980), pp. 257–267.
29.
SmithDavid B., “Auditor ‘Subject To’ Opinions, Disclaimers, and Auditor Changes,”Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Fall 1986), pp. 95–108.
30.
SmithDavid B.NicholsDonald R., “A Market Test of Investor Reactions to Disagreements,”Journal of Accounting and Economics (October 1982), pp. 109–120.
31.
MangoldNancy, “The Effect of Auditor Changes on Earnings, Opinions, and Stock Prices.” Working paper presented at the University of Southern California Accounting Research Forum (February 1984).
32.
WeissStanley, “Disclosure Surrounding a Change in Auditors: Accounting Series Release 165,”CPA Journal (March 1975), pp. 11–15.
33.
McConnellDonald K., “Are the Big 8 Increasing Their Share of the NYSE, AMEX, and OTC Audit Markets?”Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance (Winter 1984), pp. 178–181.
34.
DanosPaulEichenseherJohn W., “Audit Industry Dynamics: Factors Affecting Changes in Client-Industry Market Shares,”Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn 1982), pp. 604–616.
35.
SimunicDanSteinMichael, “On the Economics of Product Differentiation in Auditing.” Presented at the University of Kansas–Touche Ross Auditing Symposium VIII, May 22–23, 1986.
36.
EichenseherJohn W.ShieldsDavid, “Corporate Director Liability and Monitoring Preferences,”Journal of Accounting and Public Policy (Spring 1985), pp. 13–31.
37.
WallaceWanda, The Economic Role of the Audit in Free and Regulated Markets. Touche Ross Foundation, 1980.
38.
Bar-YosefSassonLivnatJoshua, “Auditor Selection: An Incentive-Signalling Approach,”Accounting and Business Research (Autumn 1984), pp. 301–309.
39.
DopuchNicholasSimunicDan, “Competition in Auditing: An Assessment,”Symposium on Auditing Research IV.University of Illinois, 1982, pp. 401–450.
40.
NicholsDonald R.SmithDavid B., “Auditor Credibility and Auditor Changes,”Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn 1983), pp. 534–544.