This study investigates the association between the balance sheet approach, where financial reporting focuses on asset and liability valuation, and the usefulness of the capital adequacy ratio in the evaluation of bank default risk by credit rating agencies. We examine Japanese banks, which play the central role in the Japanese economy, whose capital adequacy ratios are affected by fair value measurement under the balance sheet approach. We adopt Demerjian’s approach to develop a bank-level measure of balance sheet focus. Although we find a significant positive correlation between the slack of the regulatory capital adequacy ratio and issuer rating, this positive correlation weakens significantly as a bank’s dependence on the balance sheet approach increases. Our results suggest the balance sheet approach makes financial reporting less useful for measuring bank risk.
AcharyaV. V.RyanS. G. (2016). Banks’ financial reporting and financial system stability. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 277–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12114
2.
AhmedA. S.KilicE.LoboG. J. (2006). Does recognition versus disclosure matter? Evidence from value-relevance of banks’ recognized and disclosed derivative financial instruments. The Accounting Review, 81(3), 567–588. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.3.567
3.
AhmedA. S.KilicE.LoboG. J. (2011). Effects of SFAS 133 on the risk relevance of accounting measures of banks’ derivative exposures. The Accounting Review, 86(3), 769–804. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000033
4.
AnaniM.ElwasifyE. I. (2024). The AOCI filter removal and bank lending in times of stress. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 48, Article 107258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107258
5.
AokiM. (1994). The Japanese main bank system: Its relevance for developing and transforming economies. In PatrickH. (Ed.). Oxford University Press.
6.
ArgimónI.DietschM.EstradaÁ. (2018). Prudential filters, portfolio composition at fair value and capital ratios in European banks. Journal of Financial Stability, 39, 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.03.004
Ashbaugh-SkaifeH.CollinsD. W.LaFondR. (2006). The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1-2), 203–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.02.003
10.
BadiaM.DuroM.PenalvaF.RyanS. (2017). Conditionally conservative fair value measurements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.10.006
11.
BaiH.ClarkM. H. (2018). Propensity score methods and applications. Sage Publications.
12.
BaoM. X.BillettM. T.SmithD. B.UnluE. (2019). Does the variability of other comprehensive income (OCI) play a role in the determination of cost of debt, capital structure and credit ratings?Contemporary Accounting Research.
13.
BarthM. E. (1994). Fair value accounting: Evidence from investment securities and the market valuation of banks. The Accounting Review, 69(1), 1–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248258.
14.
BarthM. E.BeaverW. H.LandsmanW. R. (1996). Value-relevance of banks’ fair value disclosures under SFAS No. 107. The Accounting Review, 513–537. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248569de.
15.
BarthM. E.LandsmanW. R. (2010). How did financial reporting contribute to the financial crisis?European Accounting Review, 19(3), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2010.498619
16.
BCBS. (1988). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Bank for International Settlements. Available at. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs04a.htm
17.
BCBS. (2004). Basel II: International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: A revised framework. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Bank for International Settlements. Available at. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs107.htm
18.
BCBS. (2010). Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Bank for International Settlements. Available at. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/ypfs-documents/68/
19.
BCBS. (2011). Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems—revised version. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Bank for International Settlements. Available at. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs189.htm
20.
BCBS. (2012). Regulatory Consistency Assessment Programme (RCAP). Assessment of Basel III LCR regulations – Japan. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Bank for International Settlements. Available at. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d538.pdf
21.
BeattyA.LiaoS. (2014). Financial accounting in the banking industry: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 339–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.009
22.
BeattyA.WeberJ. (2006). Accounting discretion in fair value estimates: An examination of SFAS 142 goodwill impairments. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(2), 257–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2006.00200.x
23.
BenstonG. J.CarmichaelD. R.DemskiJ. S.DharanB. G.JamalK.LauxR.RajgopalS.VranaG. (2007). The FASB’s conceptual framework for financial reporting: A critical analysis. Accounting Horizons, 21(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.229
24.
BesankoD.KanatasG. (1996). The regulation of bank capital: Do capital standards promote bank safety?Journal of Financial Intermediation, 5(2), 160–183. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfin.1996.0009
25.
BhatG.FrankelR.MartinX. (2011). Panacea, Pandora’s box, or placebo: Feedback in bank mortgage-backed security holdings and fair value accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(2-3), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.06.002
26.
BlackE. L.CarnesT. A.MosebachM.MoyerS. E. (2004). Regulatory monitoring as a substitute for debt covenants. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3), 367–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.001
27.
BlankespoorE.LinsmeierT. J.PetroniK. R.ShakespeareC. (2013). Fair value accounting for financial instruments: Does it improve the association between bank leverage and credit risk?The Accounting Review, 88(4), 1143–1177. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50419
CameronA. C.MillerD. L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
30.
ChircopJ.Novotny-FarkasZ. (2016). The economic consequences of extending the use of fair value accounting in regulatory capital calculations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 62(2-3), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.10.004
31.
CornettM. M.McNuttJ. J.TehranianH. (2009). Corporate governance and earnings management at large US bank holding companies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(4), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.04.003
32.
de AndresP.ValleladoE. (2008). Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2570–2580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.05.008
DemerjianP. R. (2011). Accounting standards and debt covenants: Has the “balance sheet approach” led to a decline in the use of balance sheet covenants?Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(2-3), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.08.004
35.
DewatripontM.TiroleJ. (1994). The prudential regulation of banks. The walras-pareto lectures. MIT Press.
36.
DiamondD. W. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297430
EccherE. A.RameshK.ThiagarajanS. R. (1996). Fair value disclosures by bank holding companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1-3), 79–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(96)00438-7
FontesJ. C.PanaretouA.PeasnellK. V. (2018). The impact of fair value measurement for bank assets on information asymmetry and the moderating effect of own credit risk gains and losses. The Accounting Review, 93(6), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52070
42.
FrancisJ.HannaJ. D.VincentL. (1996). Causes and effects of discretionary asset write-offs. Journal of Accounting Research, 34, 117–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491429
43.
FreixasX.RochetJ. C. (2008). Microeconomics of banking. MIT Press.
44.
FSA. (2006). Whether the adequacy of equity capital of the Bank is appropriate in light of circumstances such as the assets owned by that Bank based on the Banking Act Article 14–2. Public Notice of the Ministry of Financial Services Agency, No. 19 of 2006. Available at. https://www.fsa.go.jp/news/newsj/17/ginkou/20060331-2/13.pdf(in Japanese).
45.
FSA. (2008). Exceptional case of whether the adequacy of equity capital of the Bank is appropriate in light of circumstances such as the assets owned by that Bank based on the Banking Act Article 14–2. Public Notice of the Ministry of Financial Services Agency, No. 79 of 2008. Available at. https://www.fsa.go.jp/news/20/ginkou/20081211-2/01.pdf(in Japanese).
46.
FSA. (2012a). Exceptional case of whether the adequacy of equity capital of the Bank is appropriate in light of circumstances such as the assets owned by that Bank based on the Banking Act Article 14–2. Public Notice of the Ministry of Financial Services Agency, No. 56 of 2012. Available at. https://www.fsa.go.jp/news/23/ginkou/20120629-7/01.pdf(in Japanese).
47.
FSA. (2012b). Partial revision of whether the adequacy of equity capital of the Bank is appropriate in light of circumstances such as the assets owned by that Bank based on the Banking Act Article 14-2. Public Notice of the Ministry of Financial Services Agency, No. 28 of 2012. Available at. https://www.fsa.go.jp/news/23/ginkou/20120330-1/01.pdf(in Japanese).
48.
FSA. (2013). Partial revision of whether the adequacy of equity capital of the Bank is appropriate in light of circumstances such as the assets owned by that Bank based on the Banking Act Article 14–2. Public Notice of the Ministry of Financial Services Agency, No. 6 of 2013. Available at. https://www.fsa.go.jp/news/24/ginkou/20130308-4/01.pdf(in Japanese).
49.
FSA. (2015). The Bank Holding Company, its Subsidiary Company and its ratio which the secretary of the Financial Services Agency specifies individually based on the Article 2-2, paragraph 5, No.1 and 2 of whether the adequacy of equity capital of the Bank holding company is appropriate in light of circumstances such as the assets owned by that Bank Holding Company and its Subsidiary Company based on the Banking Act Article 52–25. Public Notice of the Ministry of Financial Services Agency, No. 80 of 2015. Available at. https://www.fsa.go.jp/news/27/20151204-4/01.pdf(in Japanese).
50.
FukushimaT.YoshiokaS. (2010). Consideration for the reconstruction of capital concept in business accounting. An essay on the capital based on the debate in related fields. IMES Discussion Paper Series, 2010-J-3(in Japanese).
51.
FutaesakuN.KitagawaN.ShutoA. (2023). Delegated bank monitoring by bond investors: Evidence from Japanese main banks. European Accounting Review, 34(2), 817–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2023.2281380
52.
GohB. W.LiD.NgJ.YongK. O. (2015). Market pricing of banks’ fair value assets reported under SFAS 157 since the 2008 financial crisis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.12.002
53.
GramlichJ. D.LimpaphayomP.RheeS. G. (2004). Taxes, keiretsu affiliation, and income shifting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(2), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.001
54.
GreeneW. H. (2012). Econometric analysis, 71e. Stern School of Business.
55.
GreeneW. H.HensherD. A. (2010). Modeling ordered choices: A primer. Cambridge University Press.
56.
GreenspanA. (1998). Keynote address: The role of capital in optimal banking supervision and regulation. Economic Policy Review, 4(3), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1029754
57.
HamiltonD. (2018). Fear of (capital) commitment: Strategic accounting classifications and the consequences for fixed income dealer inventories. Available at SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3050525
58.
HellwigM. (1991). Banking, financial intermediation and corporate finance. In GiovanniniA.MayerC. (Eds.), European financial integration (pp. 35–63). Cambridge University Press.
59.
HiminoR. (2005). Verification: BIS regulation and Japan (second edition). Kinzai Institute of Financial Affairs, Inc.(in Japanese).
60.
HolmstromB.TiroleJ. (1997). Financial intermediation, loanable funds, and the real sector. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 663–691. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555316
61.
HolthausenR. W.WattsR. L. (2001). The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 3–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00029-5
62.
HoshiT.KashyahpA. (1999). The Japanese banking crisis: Where did it come from and how will it end?NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 14, 129–201.
63.
HoshiT.KashyapA. (2001). Corporate financing and governance in Japan: The road to the future. MIT Press.
InoueT. (2016). An empirical study on the usefulness of ordinary income and extraordinary income and loss. Journal of Business Administration Kwansei Gakuin University, 63(3), 455–475. (in Japanese). https://kwansei.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/20578/files/63-3-26.pdf
67.
KatsudaH.HagiwaraM.TanakaK. (2011). A Research on Credit Rating; Evaluation of credit risk analysis. Chuou Keizai sya. (in Japanese).
KimS.KimS.RyanS. G. (2019). Economic consequences of the AOCI filter removal for advanced approaches banks. The Accounting Review, 94(6), 309–335. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52436
70.
KochiyamaT.NakamuraR. (2021). Debt covenants in Japanese loan markets: In comparison with the traditional relationship banking. Accounting & Finance, 61(1), 305–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12568
71.
KolevK. S. (2009). Do investors perceive marking-to-model as marking-to-myth? Early evidence from FAS 157 disclosure. Working Paper. City University of New York.
72.
KothariS. P.RamannaK.SkinnerD. J. (2010). Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 246–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.003
KurosawaY. (2007). A Research on Credit rating Agencies. Toyo Keizai Shinpo Sya. (in Japanese).
75.
KusanoM. (2012). Does the balance sheet approach improve the usefulness of accounting information?The Japanese Accounting Review, 2(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.11640/tjar.2.2012_139
76.
LauxC.LeuzC. (2010). Did fair-value accounting contribute to the financial crisis?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.1.93
LinW.PanaretouA.PawlinaG.ShakespeareC. (2022). What can we learn about credit risk from debt valuation adjustments?Review of Accounting Studies, 28(4), 2556–2588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09705-0
79.
McInnisJ. M.YuY.YustC. G. (2018). Does fair value accounting provide more useful financial statements than current GAAP for banks?The Accounting Review, 93(6), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52007
80.
MilgromP.RobertsJ. (1992). Economics, organization and management. Prentice Hall.
81.
NelsonK. K. (1996). Fair value accounting for commercial banks: An empirical analysis of SFAS No. 107. The Accounting Review, 161–182. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248444.
82.
NemotoN. (2017). The role and limits of credit ratings in the financial market [Dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, Hitotsubashi University] (in Japanese).
83.
NgJ.RoychowdhuryS. (2014). Do loan loss reserves behave like capital? Evidence from recent bank failures. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(3), 1234–1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-014-9281-z
84.
PackerF. (2002). Credit ratings and the Japanese corporate bond market. In LevichR. M.MajnoniG.ReinhartC. (Eds.), Ratings, Rating Agencies and the Global Financial System, The New York University Salomon Center Series on Financial Markets and Institutions (9). Springer.
85.
PetersenM. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053
86.
RamannaK.WattsR. L. (2012). Evidence on the use of unverifiable estimates in required goodwill impairment. Review of Accounting Studies, 17(4), 749–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-012-9188-5
ReesL. L.ShaneP. B. (2012). Academic research and standard-setting: The case of other comprehensive income. Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 789–815. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50237
RiedlE. J.SerafeimG. (2011). Information risk and fair values: An examination of equity betas. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(4), 1083–1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2011.00408.x
91.
RyanS. G. (2017). Do the effects of accounting requirements on banks’ regulatory capital adequacy undermine financial stability?Annual Review of Financial Economics, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-110716-032340
SakuraiH. (2009). The impact of adopting international financial reporting standards (IFRS) on Japanese accounting standards. Securities Analysts Journal, 47(4), 7–18. (in Japanese). https://www.saa.or.jp/journal/titlepdf/300/30010.pdf
94.
SakuraiH. (2011). Search for the best balance of importance between earnings information and net asset information. Journal of Economics & Business Administration, 204(1), 1–16. (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.24546/81008346
95.
SatoT. (2007). Basel II and bank regulation: New capital ratio regulation. Toyokeizai shinpo-Sha. (in Japanese).
96.
SatoT. (2010). The coordinate axis of financial administration. Beyond peacetime and emergency. Toyokeizai shinpo-Sha. (in Japanese).
97.
SchönbucherP. J. (2003). Credit derivatives pricing models: Models, pricing and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
98.
ShimizuY.LeeJ.TakeiH. (2013). Analysis of determinants of split ratings and rating conservativeness between Japanese and US credit rating agencies. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 3(1), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v3i1.3507
99.
ShimodaN.KawaiY. (2007). Credit rating gaps in Japan: Difference between solicited and unsolicited ratings, and “Rating Splits”. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 07-E-11. Bank of Japan. (in Japanese).
100.
ShinY. S.MooreW. T. (2003). Explaining credit rating differences between Japanese and US agencies. Review of Financial Economics, 12(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2003.07.004
101.
ShipmanJ. E.SwanquistQ. T.WhitedR. L. (2017). Propensity score matching in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 92(1), 213–244. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51449
102.
ShutoA.IwasakiT. (2014). Stable shareholdings, the decision horizon problem and earnings smoothing. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(9-10), 1212–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12091
103.
SongC. J.ThomasW. B.YiH. (2010). Value relevance of FAS No. 157 fair value hierarchy information and the impact of corporate governance mechanisms. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1375–1410. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1375
104.
ThompsonS. B. (2011). Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.016
TokugaY.OtaY. (2014). About the way of information provision based on the contracting usefulness of accounting information: Focusing on the impact of expanding fair value evaluation. Monetary and Economic Studies, 33(1), 29–60. (in Japanese). https://www.imes.boj.or.jp/research/abstracts/japanese/kk33-1-2.html
107.
WakabayashiH. (2009). Empirical research on comprehensive income, Chuokeizai-Sha, Japan. (in Japanese).
108.
WalkerM. (2023). Accounting for debt securities in the age of Silicon Valley Bank. FRB of Boston Supervisory Research & Analysis Unit Notes.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
