Abstract
We examine stock return reversals using weekly returns from January 1980 to December 2017. Reversals are stronger for the largest size quintile than for the smallest quintile in the first half of the study. However, the reversal difference disappears in the second half. We demonstrate that a high institutional demand, mainly from institutions with small percentage of holdings, for large-firm stocks results in a high demand for immediacy as well as their strong return reversals. After institutions shifted their preferences to stocks of smaller firms since the mid-1990s, the reversal difference is no longer significant.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
