We examine the relation between director excess compensation and corporate investment efficiency, and the role of accounting quality in this association. We utilize a cost-minimization stochastic frontier approach to estimate director excess compensation. On average, over the 2007–2018 period, directors are paid approximately $59,455 more than their efficient compensation level. We find that overpaying directors aggravates agency problems and exacerbates overinvestment. Next, using an accounting quality index based on five accounting quality proxies pertaining to earnings management, value relevance, and asymmetric timely loss recognition, we document that accounting quality moderates the detrimental impact of director excess compensation on corporate investment. Our study adds to the literature on the negative effects of director excess compensation and the positive economic role of accounting.
AdamsR.HermalinB.WeisbachM. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.58
2.
AierJ. K.ChenL.PevznerM. (2014). Debtholders’ demand for conservatism: Evidence from changes in directors’ fiduciary duties. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5), 993–1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12062
3.
AltmanE. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant ansalysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.2307/2978933
4.
ArellanoM.BondS. (1991). Some tests of specification for Panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
5.
ArellanoM.BoverO. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d
6.
ArmstrongC.GuayW.WeberJ. (2010). The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 179–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.001
BasuS. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(97)00014-1
9.
BebchukL.ChenA.FerrellA. (2009). What matters in corporate governance?Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn099
BergerP.HannR. (2003). The impact of SFAS No. 131 on information and monitoring. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(2), 163–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.00100
13.
BeyerA.CohenD.LysT.BeverlyW. (2010). The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 296–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.003
BiddleG.HilaryG.VerdiR. (2009). How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency?Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.001
16.
BrickI.PalmonO.WaldJ. (2006). CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism?Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.08.005
17.
BushmanR.ChenQ.EngelE.SmithA. (2004). Financial accounting information, organizational complexity and corporate governance systems. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(2), 167–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.005
18.
BushmanR.SmithA. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 237–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00027-1
19.
ChenJ.GoergenM.LeungS. W.SongW. (2019). CEO and director compensation, CEO turnover and institutional investors: Is there cronyism in the UK?Journal of Banking & Finance, 103(2), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.03.019
20.
ChenF.HopeO.-K.LiQ.WangX. (2011). Financial reporting quality and investment efficiency of private firms in emerging markets. The Accounting Review, 86(4), 1255–1288.
21.
ChristensenH.NikolaevV.Wittenberg-MoermanR. (2016). Accounting information in financial contracting: The incomplete contract theory perspective. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 397–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12108
22.
ChungK.PruittS. (1994). A simple approximation of tobin's q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665623
23.
CohenD.ZarowinP. (2010). Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.01.002
ColesJ.DanielN.NaveenL. (2014). Co-opted Boards. Review of Financial Studies, 27(6), 1751–1796.
26.
CollinsD.GongG.HribarP. (2003). Investor sophistication and the mispricing of accruals. Review of Accounting Studies, 8, 251–276. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024417513085
DechowP.DichevI. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35
29.
DechowP.SloanR.SweeneyA. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–225.
30.
DopuchN.GuptaM. (1997). Estimation of benchmark performance standards: An application to public school expenditures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(97)00003-7
31.
EdmansA.FangV.HuangA. (2022). The long-term consequences of short-term incentives. Journal of Accounting Research, 60(3), 1007–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12410
32.
EdmansA.GoldsteinI.JiangW. (2012). The real effects of financial markets: The impact of prices on takeovers. The Journal of Finance, LXVII(3), 933–971. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01738.x
33.
FamaE.FrenchK. (1997). Industry costs of equity. The Journal of Finance,43, 153–193-153–193.
34.
FrankelR.LiX. (2004). Characteristics of a firm's information environment and the information asymmetry between insiders and outsiders. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(2), 229–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.004
35.
Garcia LaraJ. M.Garcia OsmaB.PenalvaF. (2016). Accounting conservatism and firm investment efficiency. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.07.003
GreenR. C.HollifieldB.SchürhoffN. (2007). Financial intermediation and the costs of trading in an opaque market. Review of Financial Studies, 20(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhl012
40.
GreeneW. (1993). The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In FriedH. O.SchmidtS. S. (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications (pp. 68–119). Oxford Academic.
41.
GuestN.KothariS. P.PozenR. (2022). Why do large positive non-GAAP earnings adjustments predict abnormally high CEO pay?The Accounting Review, 97(6), 297–326. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2019-0003
42.
HabibM.LjungqvistA. (2005). Firm value and managerial incentives: A stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Business, 78(6), 2053–2094. https://doi.org/10.1086/497040
HermalinB.WeisbachM. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring role of the CEO. The American Economic Review, 88(1), 96–118.
45.
HopeO. K.LuH.SaiyS. (2019). Director compensation and related party transactions. Review of Accounting Studies, 24(4), 1392–1426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-019-09497-w
46.
HopeO.-K.ThomasW.VyasD. (2017). Stakeholder demand for accounting quality and economic usefulness of accounting in U.S. private firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.11.004
47.
Hunt-MccoolJ.KohS.FrancisB. (1996). Testing for deliberate underpricing in the IPO premarket: A stochastic frontier approach. Review of Financial Studies, 9(4), 1251–1269. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/9.4.1251
48.
JensenM. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
49.
JensenM.MecklingW. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
50.
JonesK.KrishnanG.MelendrezK. (2008). Do models of discretionary accruals detect actual cases of fraudulent and restated earnings? An empirical analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 499–531. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.2.8
51.
KhanM.WattsR. (2009). Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.08.002
52.
KimK.MauldinE.PatroS. (2014). Outside directors and board advising and monitoring performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(2-3), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.02.001
53.
KorY. (2006). Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1081–1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.554
LeuzC.VerrecchiaR. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 91–124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672910
59.
LeuzC.WysockiP. (2016). The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 525–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12115
60.
MaddalaG. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press.
61.
McNicholsM. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors: Discussion. The Accounting Review, 77(Supplement: Quality on Earnings Conference), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.61
MyersS.MajlufN. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(2), 187–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(84)90023-0
66.
OhlsonJ. A. (2001). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation: An empirical perspective. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1506/7tpj-rxqn-tqc7-ffae
67.
RamalingegowdaS.WangC.-s.YuY. (2013). The role of financial reporting quality in mitigating the constraining effect of dividend policy on investment decisions. The Accounting Review, 88(3), 1007–1039. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50387
RoychowdhuryS.ShroffN.VerdiR. (2019). The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 68(2-3), 101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2019.101246
71.
ShivdasaniA.YermackD. (1999). CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1829–1853. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00168
72.
ShleiferA.VishnyR. (1989). Management entrenchment. The case of manager-specific investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(89)90099-8
73.
VermeerT.EdmondsC.AsthanaS. (2014). Organizational form and accounting choice: Are nonprofit or for-profit managers more aggressive?The Accounting Review, 89(5), 1867–1893. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50796
74.
WintokiM. B.LinckJ.NetterJ. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005
75.
WooldridgeJ. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data: MIT Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
