I analyze 2,287,907 firm-month observations over 1984–2022 and show that public regulatory 13F filings of institutional ownership contain exploitable information about expected returns even after they have been disclosed to outsiders with a 45-day delay. Using a characteristic-based model, I decompose institutional ownership into abnormal and expected components and find that portfolios of firms with the highest abnormal institutional ownership outperform portfolios of firms with the lowest abnormal institutional ownership by 76 basis points over the following month. I also find that abnormal institutional ownership predicts improvements in firms’ fundamental performance and can be combined with a strategy based on abnormal analyst coverage to produce excess returns. The findings suggest that efficient analysis of public regulatory disclosure can contain potential exploitable information about a firm’s future fundamental performance and expected returns.
Ben-DavidI.FranzoniF.MoussawiR.SedunovJ. (2021). The granular nature of large institutional investors. Management Science, 67(11), 6629–6659. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3808
2.
BennettJ.SiasR.StarksL. (2003). Greener pastures and the impact of dynamic institutional preferences. Review of Financial Studies, 16(4), 1203–1238. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg040
3.
BernardV.ThomasJ. (1989). Post-earnings-announcement drift: Delayed price response or risk premium?Journal of Accounting Research, 27(Supplement), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491062
4.
BessembinderH.ChenT.ChoiG.WeiK. (2023). Long-term shareholder returns: Evidence from 64,000 global stocks. Financial Analysts Journal. Published online 21 April 2023.
5.
BharathS.JayarmanS.NagarV. (2013). Exit as governance: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 68(6), 2515–2547. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12073
6.
BlankespoorE.deHaanE.MarinovicI. (2020). Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes; A review. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 70(2–3), 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101344
7.
BrownL.CallA.ClementM.SharpN. (2016). The activities of buy-side analysts and the determinants of their stock recommendations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 62(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.06.002
ChungD.HrazdilK. (2013). Speed of convergence to market efficiency in the ETFs market. Managerial Finance, 39(5), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351311313852
12.
Del GuercioD. (1996). The distorting effect of the prudent-man laws on institutional equity investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(95)00841-2
FamaE.MacBethJ. (1973). Risk, return and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636. https://doi.org/10.1086/260061
19.
GompersP.MetrickA. (2001). Institutional investors and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 229–259. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556392
20.
HirshleiferD.LimS. S.TeohS. H. (2009). Driven to distraction: Extraneous events and underreaction to earnings news. The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 2289–2325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01501.x
21.
HongH.LimT.SteinJ. (2000). Bad news travels slowly: Size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 265–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00206
22.
JegadeeshN. (1990). Evidence of predictable behavior of security returns. The Journal of Finance, 45(3), 881–898. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328797
23.
JegadeeshN.TitmanS. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328882
24.
JohnsonW.ZhaoR. (2007). Contrarian share price reactions to earnings surprises. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 27(2), 236–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x11409152
25.
JungM.WongF.ZhangF. (2015). Analyst interest as an early indicator of firm fundamental changes and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 90(3), 1049–1078. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50912
26.
LeeC. (2001). Market efficiency and accounting research: A discussion of ‘capital market research in accounting’ by S.P. Kothari. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00038-6
27.
LeeC.SoE. (2017). Uncovering expected returns: Information in analyst coverage proxies. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(2), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.01.007
28.
McCaheryJ.SautnerZ.StarksL. (2016). Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. The Journal of Finance, 71(6), 2905–2932. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12393
29.
NofsingerJ.SiasR. (1999). Herding and feedback trading by institutional and individual investors. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2263–2295. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00188
30.
O’BrienP.BhushanR. (1990). Analyst following and institutional ownership. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(Supplement), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491247
31.
PiotroskiJ. (2000). Value investing: The use of historical financial statement information to separate winners from losers. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(Supplement), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672906
ShumwayT.WartherV. (1999). The delisting bias in CRSP’s Nasdaq data and its implications for the size effect. The Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2361–2379. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00192
SiasR.StarksL.TitmanS. (2006). Changes in institutional ownership and stock returns: Assessment and methodology. Journal of Business, 79(6), 2869–2910. https://doi.org/10.1086/508002
36.
SloanR. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings?The Accounting Review, 71(3), 289–315. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248290
37.
YanX.ZhangZ. (2009). Institutional investors and equity returns: Are short-term institutions better informed?Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 893–924. https://doi.org/10.1093/revfin/hhl046
