Industry, firm, CEO, CFO, and time effects likely have a significant influence on a firm’s financial reporting quality (FRQ). However, our understanding of the extent to which each of these factors affects different facets of FRQ remains limited. In this paper, we employ hierarchical linear multi-level modeling (HLM) techniques to quantify the relative influence of industry, firm, manager (CEO and CFO), and year factors on FRQ attributes of accruals quality, annual report readability, comparability, and disclosure disaggregation. Our findings suggest that, on average, industry and firm-level effects have the largest impact on FRQ. CEO and CFO effects too are quite considerable. We also find that the CFO (CEO) is the comparatively more influential senior manager in shaping FRQ in terms of accounting numbers (narrative disclosure). In most cases, the five factors of industry, firm, CEO, CFO, and year explain over 70% of the variation in FRQ. The paper contributes to the literature by expanding our understanding of the extent to which characteristics that are inherent to the firm as well as those that vary by managers influence FRQ.
AierJ. K.ComprixJ.GunlockM. T.LeeD. (2005). The financial expertise of CFOs and accounting restatements. Accounting Horizons, 19(3), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2005.19.3.123
2.
BallR.KothariS. P.RobinA. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(00)00012-4
3.
BamberL. S.JiangJ. X.WangI. Y. (2010). What’s my style? The influence of top managers on voluntary corporate financial disclosure. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1131–1162. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1131
4.
BarthM. E.LandsmanW. R.LangM. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2008.00287.x
5.
BernardD.GeW.MatsumotoD.ToynbeeS. (2021). Implied tradeoffs of chief financial officer accounting expertise: Evidence from firm-manager matching. Management Science, 67(9), 5776–5799. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3738
6.
BlackwellD. (1951). Comparisons of experiments. In NeymanJ. (Ed.), Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium in mathematical statistics and probability. University of California Press.
7.
BonsallS. B.IVLeoneA. J.MillerB. P.RennekampK. (2017). A plain English measure of financial reporting readability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(2-3), 329–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.03.002
8.
BrochetF.FaurelL.McVayS. (2011). Manager‐specific effects on earnings guidance: An analysis of top executive turnovers. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(5), 1123–1162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2011.00420.x
9.
ChenG.KirkmanB. L.KimK.FarhC. I.TangiralaS. (2010). When does cross-cultural motivation enhance expatriate effectiveness? A multilevel investigation of the moderating roles of subsidiary support and cultural distance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1110–1130. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533217
10.
ChenS.MiaoB.ShevlinT. (2015). A new measure of disclosure quality: The level of disaggregation of accounting data in annual reports. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(5), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12094
11.
CrosslandC.HambrickD. (2011). Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 797–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.913
12.
DechowP.GeW.SchrandC. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 344–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001
13.
DechowP. M.DichevI. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35
14.
DechowP. M.SloanR. G.SweeneyA. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 7(2), 193–225.
15.
DeFondM. L. (2010). Earnings quality research: Advances, challenges and future research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.004
DejongD.LingZ. (2013). Managers: Their effects on accruals and firm policies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 40(1-2), 82–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12012
18.
DemerjianP.LevB.McVayS. (2012). Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Science, 58(7), 1229–1248. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1487
19.
DemerjianP. R.LevB.LewisM. F.McVayS. E. (2013). Managerial ability and earnings quality. The Accounting Review, 88(2), 463–498. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50318
20.
DoyleJ.GeW.McVayS. (2007). Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1-2), 193–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.10.003
21.
DyrengS. D.HanlonM.MaydewE. L. (2010). The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1163–1189. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1163
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2010). Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 8. Conceptual framework for financial reporting. FASB.
24.
FrancisJ.LaFondR.OlssonP.SchipperK. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.06.003
25.
GeW.MatsumotoD.ZhangJ. L. (2011). Do CFOs have style? An empirical investigation of the effect of individual CFOs on accounting practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(4), 1141–1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01097.x
26.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
27.
HambrickD.QuigleyT. J. (2014). Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2108
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
30.
HoughJ. (2006). Business segment performance redux: A multilevel approach. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.498
31.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
32.
JiangJ. X.PetroniK. R.WangI. Y. (2010). CFOs and CEOs: Who have the most influence on earnings management?Journal of Financial Economics, 96(3), 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.02.007
33.
JonesJ. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193–228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491047
34.
KoesterA.ShevlinT.WangerinD. (2017). The role of managerial ability in corporate tax avoidance. Management Science, 63(10), 3285–3310. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2510
35.
KrishnanG. V. (2003). Does Big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management?Accounting Horizons, 17(s-1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.s-1.1
36.
LeuzC.NandaD.WysockiP. D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(03)00121-1
37.
LiF. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2-3), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003
McNicholsM. F. (2002). Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.61
41.
Meyer-DoyleP.LeeS.HelfatC. E. (2019). Disentangling the microfoundations of acquisition behavior and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 40(11), 1733–1756. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3069
42.
MisangyiV. F.ElmsH.GreckhamerT.LepineJ. A. (2006). A new perspective on a fundamental debate: A multilevel approach to industry, corporate, and business unit effects. Strategic Management Journal, 27(6), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.530
43.
QuigleyT. J.GraffinS. D. (2017). Reaffirming the CEO effect is significant and much larger than chance: A comment on Fitza (2014). Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 793–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2503
44.
QuigleyT. J.HambrickD. C. (2015). Has the “CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America’s attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2258
45.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
