SEC Comment Letters and 10-K Accounting and Linguistic Reporting Complexity

Abstract

The increasing complexity of 10-K reporting has caused difficulties for investors seeking to understand and analyze a company’s financial reports. In this study, we examine whether the SEC’s comment letter process, consistent with its mission to improve public company disclosure, reduces reporting complexity in subsequent filings. We find comment letter receipt has a competing impact on two distinct dimensions of reporting complexity. Specifically, reporting complexity related to accounting concepts decreases after comment letter receipt, but linguistic reporting complexity increases. Validating this competing impact, we find that both changes to complexity are associated with changes in firms’ information asymmetry in the expected directions. Further analysis of the increase in linguistic reporting complexity suggests that managers obfuscate following comment letter receipt, where the increase is unnecessary and not occurring in response to changes in the firms’ accounting or underlying economics/operations. Overall, results suggest that while the comment letter process simplifies the presentation of reported accounting information, it also has the unintended consequence of decreasing the readability of reports. This nuance is important to understand, given that the federal government dedicates significant resources to the comment letter process.

Keywords

comment letters reporting complexity accounting complexity XBRL linguistic complexity Securities and Exchange Commission

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Becker

DeFond

Jiambalvo

Subramanyam

K. R.

(1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24.

Bens

D. A.

Cheng

Neamtiu

(2016). The impact of SEC disclosure monitoring on uncertainty of fair value estimates. The Accounting Review, 91(2), 349–375.

Bonsall

I. V. S. B.

Leone

A. J.

Miller

B. P.

Rennekamp

(2017). A plain English measure of financial reporting readability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(2–3), 329–357.

Bozanic

Dietrich

J. R.

Johnson

B. A.

(2017). SEC comment letters and firm disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(5), 337–357.

Bozanic

Thevenot

(2015). Qualitative disclosure and changes in sell-side financial analysts’ information environment. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(4), 1595–1616.

Brown

N. C.

Huffman

A. A.

Cohen

(2021). Accounting reporting complexity and non-GAAP earnings disclosure [Working paper]. University of Illinois, The Brattle Group, and San Diego State University.

Bushee

B. J.

Gow

I. D.

Taylor

D. J.

(2018). Linguistic complexity in firm disclosures: Obfuscation or information? Journal of Accounting Research, 56(1), 85–121.

Cassell

C. A.

Cunningham

L. M.

Lisic

L. L.

(2019). The readability of company responses to SEC comment letters and SEC 10-K filing review outcomes. Review of Accounting Studies, 24(4), 1252–1276.

Cassell

C. A.

Dreher

L. M.

Myers

L. A.

(2013). Reviewing the SEC’s review process: 10-K comment letters and the cost of remediation. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1875–1908.

10.

ChyChyla

Leone

A. J.

Minutti-Meza

(2019). Complexity of financial reporting standards and accounting expertise. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(1), 226–253.

11.

Cunningham

L. M.

Johnson

B. A.

Johnson

E. S.

Lisic

L. L.

(2020). The switch up: An examination of changes in earnings management after receiving SEC comment letters. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 917–944.

12.

Cunningham

L. M.

Leidner

J. J.

(2022). The SEC filing review process: A survey and future research opportunities. Contemporary Accounting Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12742

13.

Daske

Hail

Leuz

Verdi

(2013). Adopting a label: Heterogeneity in the economic consequences around IAS/IFRS adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(3), 495–547.

14.

Debreceny

R. S.

Farewell

S. M.

Piechocki

Felden

Graning

d’Eri

(2011). Flex or break? Extensions in XBRL disclosures to the SEC. Accounting Horizons, 25(4), 631–657.

15.

Dechow

Lawrence

Ryans

(2016). SEC comment letters and insider sales. The Accounting Review, 91(2), 401–439.

16.

DeFond

Erkens

D. H.

Zhang

(2016). Do client characteristics really drive the big N audit quality effect? New evidence from propensity score matching. Management Science, 63(11), 3628–3649.

17.

DeFond

Francis

J. R.

Hallman

N. J.

(2018). Awareness of SEC enforcement and auditor reporting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 277–313.

18.

Demerjian

Lev

McVay

(2012). Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Science, 58(7), 1229–1248.

19.

Duro

Heese

Ormazabal

(2019). The effect of enforcement transparency: Evidence from SEC comment-letter reviews. Review of Accounting Studies, 24(3), 780–823.

20.

Ernst and Young. (2018, September 24). SEC reporting update – 2018 trends in SEC comment letters (No. 2018-03). https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_us/topics/audit/ey-secreportingupdate-04322-181us-commentstrends-24september2018.pdf

21.

Filzen

J. J.

Peterson

(2015). Financial statement complexity and meeting analysts’ expectations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(4), 1560–1594.

22.

Financial Reporting Council. (2017). XBRL: Deep dive. Digital future of corporate reporting.

23.

Francis

(2014, September 12). To be clear, SEC reviewers want filings in plain English, period; agency staffers correct punctuation, scout jargon in filings; larger type, please. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/to-be-clear-sec-reviewers-want-filings-in-plain-english-period-1410555347

24.

Golden

R. G.

(2014, December 9). Speech delivered at AICPA Conference on the SEC, PCAOB, and FASB. https://fasb.org/document/blob?fileName=Speech%20-%20RGG%20-%20SEC%20conference%20-%2012%209%2014%20-%20FINAL.pdf

25.

Gunning

(1952). The technique of clear writing. McGraw-Hill International Book Co.

26.

Gunny

Hermis

(2019). How busyness influences SEC compliance activities: Evidence from the filing review process and comment letters. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(1), 7–32.

27.

Hennes

K. M.

Schenck

K. M.

(2014). The development of reporting norms without explicit guidance: An example from accounting for gift cards. Accounting Horizons, 28(3), 561–578.

28.

Hoitash

(2018). Measuring accounting reporting complexity with XBRL. The Accounting Review, 93(1), 259–287.

29.

Hoitash

Yezegel

(2021). Can sell-side analysts’ experience, expertise and qualifications help mitigate the adverse effects of accounting reporting complexity? Review of Quantitative, Finance, and Accounting, 57(3), 859–897.

30.

Hrazdil

Simunic

D. A.

Suwanyangyuan

(2021). Auditor choice and the informativeness of 10-K reports. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X211062430

31.

Huang

A. H.

Lehavy

Yang

Zheng

(2018). Analyst information discovery and interpretation roles: A topic modeling approach. Management Science, 64(6), 2473–2972.

32.

Johnston

Petacchi

(2017). Regulatory oversight of financial reporting: Securities and Exchange Commission comment letters. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 1128–1155.

33.

Kedia

Rajgopal

(2011). Do the SEC’s enforcement preferences affect corporate misconduct? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 259–278.

34.

Kubick

T. R.

Lynch

D. P.

Mayberry

M. A.

Omer

T. C.

(2016). The effects of regulatory scrutiny on tax avoidance: An examination of SEC comment letters. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1751–1780.

35.

Lawrence

(2013). Individual investors and financial disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(1), 130–147.

36.

Lehavy

Merkley

(2011). The effect of annual report readability on analyst following and the properties of their earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 86(3), 1087–1115.

37.

(2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2), 221–247.

38.

Ramos

Rogo

(2017). Earnings management and annual report readability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(1), 1–25.

39.

Loughran

McDonald

(2014). Measuring readability in financial disclosures. The Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1643–1671.

40.

Loughran

McDonald

(2017). The use of EDGAR filings by investors. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 18(2), 231–248.

41.

Miller

B. P.

(2010). The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading. The Accounting Review, 85(6), 2107–2143.

42.

Peterson

(2012). Accounting complexity, misreporting, and the consequences of misreporting. Review of Accounting Studies, 17(1), 72–95.

43.

Peterson

Schmardebeck

Wilks

T. J.

(2015). The earnings quality and information processing effects of accounting consistency. The Accounting Review, 90(6), 2483–2514.

44.

Pettinicchio

(2018). SEC supervisory activity in the financial industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 35(3), 607–636.

45.

Ryans

J. P.

(2021). Textual classification of SEC comment letters. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(1), 37–80.

46.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (1998). A plain English handbook: How to create clear SEC disclosure documents.

47.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2018a). Congressional budget justification annual performance plan. https://www.sec.gov/files/secfy18congbudgjust.pdf

48.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2018b). Disclosure update and simplification (Release No. 33-10532).

49.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2019). FAST act modernization and simplification of regulation S-K (Release No. 33-10618).

50.

Wang

(2016). Determinants of segment disclosure deficiencies and the effect of the SEC comment letter process. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(2), 109–133.

51.

White

M. J.

(2015, December 9). Maintaining high-quality, reliable financial reporting: A shared and weighty responsibility (Conference session). Speech delivered at AICPA National Conference, Washington DC, United States.

52.

You

Zhang

(2009). Financial reporting complexity and investor underreaction to 10-K information. Review of Accounting Studies, 14(4), 559–586.