In this study, I examine whether management discloses areas with higher financial reporting risk as critical accounting policies (CAPs) and how investors react to restatements of areas previously disclosed as CAPs. Through CAPs, management annually discloses the accounting policies that it views as most crucial to the portrayal of the firm’s financial condition and results and require its most difficult, subjective, and/or complex judgments. I find that CAPs covering four areas are predictive of subsequent restatements: revenue, derivatives, accruals and short-term liabilities, and capitalization of expenditures. In tests of investor reactions to restatements, I find that cumulative abnormal returns to restatements are more severe (negative) when the areas restated were previously disclosed as CAPs. Collectively, these findings support that management discloses area-specific financial reporting risk through CAPs in some, but not all, areas and that investors view restatements of CAP areas as more egregious than restatements of non-CAP areas.
ArifS.MarshallN.SchroederJ.YohnR. (2019). A growing disparity in earnings disclosure mechanisms: The rise of concurrently released earnings announcements and 10-Ks. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 68(1), Article s0165410118301228.
2.
Ashbaugh-SkaifeH.CollinsD.KinneyW.LaFondR. (2008). The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 217–250.
3.
BadertscherB.HribarP.JenkinsN. (2011). Informed trading and the market reaction to accounting restatements. The Accounting Review, 86(5), 1519–1547.
BrattenB.CausholliM.OmerT. (2019). Audit firm tenure, bank complexity, and financial reporting quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(1), 295–325.
6.
BrownS.TianX.TuckerJ. (2018). The spillover effect of SEC comment letters on qualitative corporate disclosure: Evidence from the risk factor disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(2), 622–656.
CoxJ. D. (2013). Strengthening financial reporting: An essay on expanding the auditor’s opinion letter. The George Washington Law Review, 81(3), 1036–1062.
9.
CzerneyK.SchmidtJ.ThompsonA. (2014). Does auditor explanatory language in unqualified audit reports indicate increased financial misstatement risk?The Accounting Review, 89(6), 2115–2149.
10.
DambraM.GustafsonM.QuinnP. (2020). Tax-advantaged trust use among IPO executives: Determinants and implications for valuation and future performance. The Accounting Review, 95(3), 145–175.
11.
DechowP.DichevI. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(4), 35–59.
Ernst & Young. (2014). 2014SEC annual reports—Form 10-k.
14.
FrancisJ.LaFondR.OlssonP.SchipperK. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295–327.
15.
GlendeningM. (2017). Critical accounting estimate disclosures and the predictive value of earnings. Accounting Horizons, 31(4), 1–12.
16.
GlendeningM.MauldinE.ShawK. W. (2019). Determinants and consequences of quantitative critical accounting estimate disclosures. The Accounting Review, 94(5), 189–218.
17.
HainmuellerJ. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25–46.
18.
HribarP.JenkinsN. (2004). The effect of accounting restatements on earnings revisions and the estimated cost of capital. Review of Accounting Studies, 9(2–3), 337–356.
19.
HribarP.NicholsC. (2007). The use of unsigned earnings quality measures in tests of earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(5), 1017–1053.
20.
HughesS. B.SanderJ. F.SnyderJ. K. (2009). Critical accounting policy and estimate disclosures: Company response to the evolving SEC guidance. Research in Accounting Regulation, 2(1), 19–33.
21.
KPMG. (2011, September30). Comment letter in response to PCAOB rulemaking docket matter No. 034: Concept release on possible revisions to PCAOB standards related to reports on audited financial statements and related amendments to PCAOB standards. https://pcaobus.org/Rulemaking/Docket034/074c_KPMG.pdf
22.
KravetT.ShevlinT. (2010). Accounting restatements and information risk. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(2), 264–294.
LevineC. B.SmithM. J. (2011). Critical accounting policy disclosures. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 26(1), 39–75.
25.
LiangY.MarinovicI.VarasF. (2018). The credibility of financial reporting: A reputation-based approach. The Accounting Review, 93(1), 317–333.
26.
McMullinJ.SchonbergerB. (2020). Entropy-balanced accruals. Review of Accounting Studies, 25, 84–119.
27.
PalmroseZ.RichardsonV.ScholzS. (2004). Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(1), 59–89.
28.
PaprockiC.StoneM. S. (2004). Is the quality of critical accounting policy disclosures lower for companies with high information asymmetry? [Working Paper]. The University of Alabama.
29.
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2017, June1). The auditor’s report on an audit of financial statements when the auditor expresses an unqualified opinion and related amendments to PCAOB standards. PCAOB Release No. 2017-001, PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034.
30.
QuinnP. (2018). Shifting corporate culture: Executive stock ownership plan adoptions and incentives to meet or just beat analysts’ expectations. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(2), 654–685.
31.
ScholzS. (2014). Financial restatement trends in the United States: 2003-2012. Center for Audit Quality.
Securities and Exchange Commission. (2002May10). Proposed rule: Disclosure in management’s discussion and analysis about the application of critical accounting policies. Securities Act Release Nos.: 33-8098; 34-45907, Washington, DC.
34.
Securities and Exchange Commission. (2003, December19). Interpretation: Commission guidance regarding management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. Securities Act Release Nos.: 33-8350; 34-48960; FR-72, Washington, DC.
35.
Securities and Exchange Commission. (2020, January30). Proposed rule: Management’s discussion and analysis, selected financial data, and supplementary financial information. Securities Act Release Nos.: 33-10750; 34-88093, Washington, DC.
36.
ShroffN.VerdiR.YostB. (2017). When does the peer information environment matter?Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64(2–3), 183–214.
37.
ThompsonR. (2019). Reporting misstatements as revisions: An evaluation of managers’ use of materiality discretion [Working Paper]. The University of Texas at El Paso.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
