Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In 2007, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) decided to allow foreign private issuers to file financial statements prepared according to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) without reconciliation to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Using a sample of foreign private issuers from 35 countries/regions during the period of 2005 to 2008, this article investigates how the elimination of the 20-F reconciliation affects financial analysts. We find that it significantly reduces analyst coverage but has no impact on forecast accuracy. We show that analysts who are greatly affected are more likely to terminate their coverage of IFRS firms after the SEC’s rule than other analysts. In addition, we hypothesize and find that eliminating the 20-F reconciliation has a greater impact on firms whose 20-F reconciliation is more useful to analysts. For these firms, the elimination of the 20-F reconciliation significantly reduces both analyst coverage and forecast accuracy. Overall, our results suggest that the elimination of the 20-F reconciliation imposes costs on financial analysts.

Keywords

financial analysts International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)U.S. GAAP Form 20-F reconciliation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashbaugh

Pincus

(2001). Domestic accounting standards, international accounting standards, and the predictability of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 417–434.

Bae

Tan

Welker

(2008). International GAAP differences: The impact on foreign analysts. The Accounting Review, 83, 593–628.

Barth

Kasznik

Mcnichols

(2001). Analyst coverage and intangible assets. Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 1–34.

Bertrand

Duflo

Mullainathan

(2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 249–275.

Beyer

Cohen

Lys

T. Z.

Walther

B. R.

(2010). The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 296–343.

Bhushan

(1989). Firm characteristics and analyst following. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11, 255–274.

Brown

(2001). Predicting individual analyst earnings forecast accuracy. Financial Analysts Journal, 57, 44–49.

Byard

(2011). The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on financial analysts’ information environment. Journal of Accounting Research, 49, 69–96.

Byard

Mashruwala

Suh

(2010). The economic consequences of eliminating the reconciliation of IFRS to U.S.GAAP: An information transfer analysis [Working paper]. City University of New York.

10.

CFA Institute. (2007). Comment letter to SEC dated October 2, 2007 (Re: File No. S7-13-07). http://sec.gov/comments/s7-13-07/s71307-125.pdf

11.

Chaney

P. K.

Hogan

C. E.

Jeter

D. C.

(1999). The effect of reporting restructuring charges on analysts’ forecast revisions and errors. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27, 261–284.

12.

Chen

Deng

Gupta

Sami

(2015). The SEC’s elimination of 20-F reconciliation and information asymmetry. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 11, 75–87.

13.

Chen

Khurana

I. K.

(2015). The impact of eliminating the Form 20-F reconciliation on shareholder wealth: Evidence from U.S. cross-listed firms. The Accounting Review, 90(1), 199–228.

14.

Chen

Krishnan

Sami

(2015). Goodwill impairment charges and analyst forecast properties. Accounting Horizons, 29, 141–169.

15.

Chen

Sami

(2008). Trading volume reaction to the earnings reconciliation from IAS to U.S. GAAP. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25, 15–33.

16.

Chen

Sami

(2010). Trading volume reaction to the earnings reconciliation from IFRS to U.S.GAAP: Further evidence [Working paper]. Arizona State University; Lehigh University.

17.

Clement

(1999). Analyst forecast accuracy: Do ability, resources, and portfolio complexity matter? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27, 285–303.

18.

Clement

Tse

(2005). Financial analyst characteristics and herding behavior in forecasting. The Journal of Finance, 60, 307–341.

19.

De Franco

D. G.

Kothari

S. P.

Verdi

R. S

. (2011). The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting Research, 49, 895–931.

20.

Duru

Reeb

D. M.

(2002). International diversification and analysts’ forecast accuracy and bias. The Accounting Review, 77, 415–433.

21.

Gordon

Jorgensen

Linthicum

(2009). Could IFRS replace U.S.GAAP? A comparison of earnings attributes and the informativeness in the U.S. market [Working paper]. Temple University; Columbia University; University of Texas at San Antonio.

22.

Guan

Hope

O.-K.

Kang

(2006). Does similarity of local GAAP to U.S. GAAP explain analysts’ forecast accuracy? Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 2(2), 151–169.

23.

Hansen

Pownall

Prakash

Vulcheva

(2010). Relaxing the reconciliation requirement in non-U.S. firms’ SEC filings: Changes in GAAP, earnings attributes, and earnings informativeness [Working paper]. Emory University.

24.

Harris

Muller

(1999). The market valuation of IAS versus U.S. GAAP accounting measures using form 20-F reconciliations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26, 285–312.

25.

Henry

Lin

Yang

(2009). The European-U.S. GAAP gap: Amount, type, homogeneity and value relevance of IFRS to U.S. GAAP from 20-F reconciliations. Accounting Horizons, 23, 121–150.

26.

Jacob

Lys

Neale

(1999). Expertise in forecasting performance of security analysts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28, 27–50.

27.

Jiang

Petroni

K. R.

Wang

I. Y.

(2010). Did eliminating the 20-F reconciliation between IFRS and US GAAP matter? [Working paper]. Michigan State University.

28.

Kang

Krishnan

G. V.

Wolfe

M. C.

H. S.

(2012). The impact of eliminating the 20-F reconciliation requirement for IFRS filers on earnings persistence and information uncertainty. Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 741–765.

29.

Kim

(2012). Does eliminating the Form 20-F reconciliation from IFRS to U.S. GAAP have capital market consequences? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53, 249–270.

30.

Lang

M. H.

Lins

K. V.

Miller

D. P.

(2004). Concentrated control, analyst following, and valuation: Do analysts matter most when investors are protected least? Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 589–623.

31.

Lang

M. H.

Lundholm

(1996). Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review, 71, 467–492.

32.

Lin

Y.-H.

Huang

H.-W.

(2014). Eliminating the Form 20-F reconciliation and audit pricing [Working paper]. National Cheng Kung University.

33.

Mikhail

Walther

Willis

(1997). Do security analysts improve their performance with experience? Journal of Accounting Research, 35, 131–166.

34.

O’Brien

P. C.

Bhushan

(1990). Analyst following and institutional ownership. Journal of Accounting Research, 28, 55–76.

35.

Plumlee

(2007). 20-F filers and SEC proposed changes: Some evidence of a U.S. Home GAAP preference [Working paper]. University of Utah.

36.

Rock

Sedo

Willenborg

(2001). Analyst following and count-data econometrics. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30, 351–373.

37.

Stickel

(1991). Common stock returns surrounding earnings forecast revisions: More puzzling evidence. The Accounting Review, 66, 402–416.

38.

Tan

Wang

Welker

(2011). Analyst following and forecast accuracy after mandated IFRS adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 49, 1307–1356.

39.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2005). A securities regulator looks at convergence (Ed., Nicolaisen

Donald T.

). http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch040605dtn.htm

40.

Yang

Henry

(2013). Does multistandard reporting affect analysts’ forecasts? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 24, 55–67.

41.

(2011). The Interaction of voluntary and mandatory disclosures: Evidence from the SEC’s elimination of the IFRS-U.S.GAAP reconciliation [Working paper]. University of Georgia.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.34 MB

Analyst Following and Forecast Accuracy After Eliminating the 20-F Reconciliation Between IFRS and U.S. GAAP

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material