We examine whether audit quality inputs are related to the conformity of financial statements to Benford’s law. We find that overall financial statement conformity increases with audit fees, nonaudit fees, and audit report lag, and decreases with audit firm tenure. We also find that these audit quality inputs are more strongly associated with income statement conformity than with cash flow statement conformity. Our findings document the role that auditing plays in enhancing the conformity of financial statements to Benford’s law.
AmiramD.BozanicZ.CoxJ. D.DupontQ.KarpoffJ. M.SloanR. (2018). Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: A multidisciplinary review of the literature. Review of Accounting Studies, 23, 732–783.
2.
AmiramD.BozanicZ.RouenE. (2015). Financial statement errors: Evidence from the distributional properties of financial statement numbers. Review of Accounting Studies, 20(4), 1540–1593.
3.
BenfordF. (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78(4), 551–572.
4.
BoyleJ. (1994). An application of Fourier series to the most significant digit problem. The American Mathematical Monthly, 101(9), 879–886.
5.
CarslawC. A. P. N. (1988). Anomalies in income numbers: Evidence of goal oriented behavior. The Accounting Review, 63(2), 321–327.
6.
DavisL. R.SooB. S.TrompeterG. M. (2009). Auditor tenure and the ability to meet or beat earnings forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(2), 517–548.
7.
DurtschiC.HillisonW.PaciniC. (2004). The effective use of Benford’s law to assist in detecting fraud in accounting data. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 5(1), 17–34.
8.
FewsterR. M. (2009). A simple explanation of Benford’s law. The American Statistician, 63(1), 26–32.
9.
FrancisJ.PhilbrickD.SchipperK. (1994). Shareholder litigation and corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2), 137–164.
10.
HillT. P. (1995). A statistical derivation of the significant-digit law. Statistical Science, 10(4), 354–363.
11.
JohnsonV. E.KhuranaI. K.ReynoldsJ. K. (2002). Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 637–660.
12.
JudgeG.SchechterL. (2009). Detecting problems in survey data using Benford’s law. The Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 1–24.
13.
LeyE. (1996). On the peculiar distribution of the U.S Stock Indexes’ digits. The American Statistician, 50(4), 311–313.
14.
MarchiS.HamiltonJ. T. (2006). Assessing the accuracy of self-reported data: An evaluation of the toxics release inventory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32(1), 57–76.
15.
MichalskiT.StoltzG. (2013). Do countries falsify economic data strategically? Some evidence that they might. The Review of Economic and Statistics, 95(2), 591–616.
16.
NewcombS. (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4(1), 39–40.
17.
NigriniM. J. (1995). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s law. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18(1), 72–91.
18.
NigriniM. J. (2015). Persistent patterns in stock returns, stock volumes, and accounting data in the U.S. capital markets. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 30(4), 541–557.
19.
NigriniM. J.MillerS. J. (2009). Data diagnostics using second-order tests of Benford’s law. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 305–324.
20.
NigriniM. J.MittermaierL. J. (1997). The use of Benford’s law as an aid in analytical procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 16(2), 52–67.
21.
PinkhamR. (1961). On the distribution of first significant digits. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(4), 1223–1230.
22.
RaimiR. A. (1969). The peculiar distribution of first digits. Scientific American, 221(6), 109–121.
23.
RaimiR. A. (1976). The first digit problem. The American Mathematical Monthly, 83(7), 521–538.
24.
RossK. A. (2017). Benford’s law, a growth industry. The American Mathematical Monthly, 118(7), 571–583.
25.
ThomasJ. K. (1989). Unusual patterns in reported earnings. The Accounting Review, 64 (4), 773–787.
26.
VarianH. R. (1972). Benford’s law. The American Statistician, 26(3), 65–66.
27.
ZmijewskiM. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 59–32.
