Abstract
This study investigates the determinants of compensation disclosure transparency in the context of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) compensation regulation of 2006. Specifically, it focuses on incentive-related compensation disclosure required by Reg. S-K 402(b). I find that compensation disclosure transparency is negatively associated with managerial power and proprietary cost but is positively associated with external monitoring. These findings hold for both the pre- and postregulation periods. Furthermore, the effects from proprietary cost become weaker in the postregulation years, and stronger external monitoring tends to reduce the negative relations between compensation disclosure transparency and managerial power and proprietary cost. Finally, I document an inverted U-shape relation between excess CEO compensation and compensation disclosure transparency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
