This study empirically tests the argument that the magnitude of bid premium is influenced by the executives' self-interest of maximizing their compensation. We evaluate the compensation maximization motivation by examining the association between the magnitude of bid premium and change in CEO cash compensation (salary plus cash bonus) from the pre-acquisition to post-acquisition period. The results, based on 646 mergers/acquisitions from 1994 to 1998, support the expectation that the bid premium is positively associated with the change in CEO cash compensation. The positive association between bid premium and CEO cash compensation is, however, moderated when the CEO has shareholdings in the firm and especially when the acquiring firm undertakes size-contraction activities during the post-acquisition period.
AndersonJ.C.LouderbackJ.G.III1975. “Income Manipulation and Purchase-Pooling Choice: Some Additional Results”. Journal of Accounting Research, 13 (Autumn): 338–343.
2.
AyersB.C.LefanowiczC.E.RobinsonJ.R.. 2000. “The Effects of Goodwill Tax Deductions on the Market for Corporate Acquisitions”. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 22 (Supplement): 34–50.
3.
BaumolW.J.1959. Business Behavior, Value and Growth.New York: Macmillan Inc.
4.
BerkovitchE.NarayananM.P.. 1993. “Motives for Takeovers: An Empirical Investigation”. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28 (3): 347–362.
5.
BradleyM.DesaiA.KimE.H.. 1988. “Synergistic Gains from Corporate Acquisitions and Their Division between the Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firms”. Journal of Financial Economics, 21 (1): 3–41.
6.
CopelandR.M.WestonJ.F.. 1992. Financial Theory and Corporate Policy.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Third Edition: 692–690.
7.
CopelandR.M.WojdakJ.F.. 1969. “Income Manipulation and the Purchase-Pooling Choice”. Journal of Accounting Research, 7 (Autumn): 188–195.
8.
DattaS.Iskandar-DattaM.RamanK.. 2001. “Executive Compensation and Corporate Acquisition Decisions”. The Journal of Finance, 56 (6): 2299–2236.
9.
FASB. June 2001. Business Combinations FASB 141, FASB. Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
10.
FishmanM.J.1989. “Preemptive Bidding and the Role of the Medium of Exchange in Acquisitions”. Journal of Finance, 44 (1): 41–57.
11.
HaspeslaghP.C.JemisonD.B.. 1991. “Managing the Acquisition Process”. Managing Acquisitions.New York: The Free Press. Macmillan, Inc. 41–57.
12.
HaywardM.HambrickD.. 1997. “Explaining the Premiums Paid for Large Acquisitions: Evidence of CEO Hubris”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1): 103–127.
13.
HubbardG.R.PaliaD.. 1995. “Benefits of Control, Managerial Ownership, and the Stock Returns of Acquiring Firms”. The Rand Journal of Economics, 26 (Winter) (4): 782–793.
14.
JarrellG.A.PoulsenA.B.. 1989. “The Returns to Acquiring Firms in Tender Offers: Evidence from Three Decades”. Financial Management, 18 (3): 12–20.
15.
JarrellG.A.PoulsenA.B.. 1988. “Dual-Class Recapitalizations as Antitakeover Mechanisms: The Recent Evidence”. Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1, 2): 129–153.
16.
JensonM.C.1986. “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers”. The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association 76 (May): 323–329.
17.
JensenM.C.MecklingW.H.. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure”. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4): 305–360.
18.
KhoranaA.ZennerM.. 1998. “Executive Compensation of Large Acquirors in the 1980s”. Journal of Corporate Finance, 4 (3): 209–240.
19.
LodererC.MartinK.. 1990. “Corporate Acquisitions by Listed Firms: The Experience of a Comprehensive Sample”. Financial Management, 19 (4): 17–33.
20.
MuellerD.C.1969. “A Theory of Conglomerate Mergers”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 83 (4): 643–659.
21.
NathanK.1988. “Do Firms Pay to Pool? Some Empirical Evidence”. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 7 (3): 185–200.
22.
RobinsonJ.R.ShaneP.B.. 1990. “Acquisition Accounting Method and Bid Premia for Target Firms”. The Accounting Review, 65 (1): 25–48.
23.
RollR.1986. “The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers”. Journal of Business, 59 (2): 197–216.
24.
SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission). 2003. Accounting Staff Bulletin (SAB) No. 103. Update of Codifications of Staff Accounting Bulletins. Division of Corporate Finance, Washington, D.C.
25.
ServaesH.1991. “Tobin's Q and the Gains from Takeovers”. The Journal of Finance, 46 (1): 409–421.
26.
ShleiferA.VishnyR.W.. 1988. “Value Maximization and the Acquisition Process”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2 (1): 7–20.
27.
SluskyA.R.CavesR.E.. 1991. “Synergy, Agency, and the Determinants of Premia Paid in Mergers”. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 39 (3): 277–296.
