The accounting profession is facing a credibility crisis precipitated by the failure of several high-profile companies and the alleged failure of their auditors to detect and persuade their clients to recognize economic losses in earnings in a timely fashion. Investors, regulators, analysts, and the public are interested in identifying factors that enhance the timeliness of earnings, particularly about bad news. This study provides empirical evidence on one such factor—auditors' industry expertise. Using a large sample of clients of Big 6 auditors, this research examines the association between auditor industry expertise, measured in terms of an industry's share in the auditor's portfolio of client industries, and the speed with which publicly available bad news about future cash flows is recognized in earnings. The findings indicate that the earnings of clients of specialist auditors are more timely in reflecting bad news than earnings of clients of nonspecialist auditors. This finding is consistent with the notion that auditors' industry expertise moderates the tendency of auditees to delay the recognition of economic losses in earnings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BallR.KothariS. P.RobinA.. 2000. “The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (February): 1–51.
2.
BasuS.1997. “The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (December): 3–37.
3.
BasuS.HwangL.JanC.. 2000. “Differences in Conservatism Between Big Eight and Non-Big Eight Auditors”. Working Paper. City University of New York and California State University.
4.
BeckerC.DeFondM.JiambalvoJ.SubramanyamK.. 1998. “The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15 (Spring): 1–24.
5.
BedardJ.BiggsS.. 1991. “The Effect of Domain-Specific Experience on Evaluation of Management Representation in Analytical Procedures”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 10 (Suppl.): 77–95.
6.
BerndtE.1991. The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary, New York: Addison-Wesley.
7.
CarcelloJ.NagyA.. 2003. “Auditor Industry Specialization and Fraudulent Financial Reporting”. Working Paper. University of Tennessee and John Carroll University.
8.
ChristieA.1987. “On Cross-Sectional Analysis in Accounting Research”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 9 (December): 231–258.
9.
DeAngeloL.1981. “Auditor Size and Auditor Quality”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3 (December): 183–199.
10.
DopuchN.SimunicD.. 1982. “The Competition in Auditing: An Assessment”. In Fourth Symposium on Auditing Research.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
11.
FamaE.MacBethJ.. 1973. “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests”. Journal of Political Economy, 81 (May/June): 607–636.
12.
FrancisJ.PhilbrickD.SchipperK.. 1994. “Shareholder Litigation and Corporate Disclosures”. Journal of Accounting Research, 32 (Autumn): 137–164.
FrancisJ.MaydewE.SparksH.. 1999. “The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18 (Fall): 17–34.
15.
General Accounting Office. 2003. “Accounting Firm Consolidation. Selected Large Public Company Views on Audit Fees, Quality, Independence, and Choice”. (September).
16.
GiglerF.HemmerT.. 2001. “Conservatism, Optimal Disclosure Policy, and the Timeliness of Financial Reports”. The Accounting Review, 76 (October): 471–493.
17.
GinerB.ReesW.. 2001. “On the Asymmetric Recognition of Good and Bad News in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom”. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28 (November/December): 1285–1331.
18.
GramlingA.StoneD.. 2001. “Audit Firm Industry Expertise: A Review and Synthesis of the Archival Literature”. Journal of Accounting Literature, 20: 1–29.
JohnsonP.JamalK.BerrymanR.. 1991. “Effects of Framing on Auditor Decisions”. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (October): 75–105.
21.
KinneyW.MartinR.. 1994. “Does Auditing Reduce Bias in Financial Reporting? A Review of Audit-Related Adjustment Studies”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Spring): 149–156.
22.
KrishnanG.2003. “Does Big 6 Auditor Industry Expertise Constrain Earnings Management?”Accounting Horizons, 17 (Suppl.): 1–16.
23.
KwonS.1996. “The Impact of Competition Within the Client's Industry Specialization on the Auditor Selection Decision”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15 (Spring): 53–70.
24.
MalettaM.WrightA.. 1996. “Audit Evidence Planning: An Examination of Industry Error Characteristics”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15 (Spring): 71–86.
25.
O'KeefeT.KingR.GaverK.. 1994. “Audit Fees, Industry Specialization, and Compliance with GAAS Reporting Standards”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice &Theory, 13 (Fall): 41–55.
26.
PopeP.WalkerM.. 1999. “International Differences in the Timeliness, Conservatism, and Classification of Earnings”. Journal of Accounting Research, 37 (Suppl.), 53–87.
27.
SimunicD., 1980. “The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence”. Journal of Accounting Research, 18 (Spring): 161–190.
28.
SkinnerD.1994. “Why Firms Voluntarily Disclose Bad News?”Journal of Accounting Research, 32 (Spring): 38–60.
29.
SolomonI.ShieldsM.WhittingtonR.. 1999. “What Do Industry-Specialist Auditors Know?”Journal of Accounting Research, 37 (Spring): 191–208.
30.
St. PierreK.AndersonJ.. 1984. “An Analysis of the Factors Associated with Lawsuits Against Public Accountants”. Accounting Review, 59 (April): 242–263.
31.
Wall Street Journal. 2002. “Accounting Faces Calls for Change”. February 6.
32.
YardleyJ.KauffmanN.CairneyT.AlbrechtD.. 1992. “Supplier Behavior in the U.S. Audit Market”. Journal of Accounting Literature (11): 151–184.
