Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper develops empirical implications of the Feltham and Ohlson (1995) model, which relates a firm's market value to accounting data and their expected realizations. The key issue concerns how one conceptualizes/measures a firm's expected growth to explain its market value when the model also includes more basic accounting measures reflecting its current performance. It is shown that market value can be expressed in terms of (1) financial assets (liabilities) with a coefficient of 1, (2) the expected change in operating earnings with a nonnegative coefficient, (3) the expected operating earnings with a positive coefficient, (4) current (net) operating assets with a nonnegative coefficient, and (5) the expected change in (net) operating assets with a positive coefficient. One identifies the measure of a firm's expected growth by normalizing the last variable with current (net) operating assets. The variable will be relevant if and only if the accounting is conservative.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barth

Beaver

Hand

Landsman

. 1999. “Accruals, Cash Flow and Equity Values.” Working Paper, Stanford University.

Bar-Yosef

Callen

Livnat

. 1997. “Modeling Dividends, Earnings, and Book Value of Equity: An Empirical Investigation of the Ohlson Valuation Dynamics”. Review of Accounting Studies, 1 (3): 207–224.

Brown

Lys

. 1998. “Use of R2 in Accounting Research: Measuring Changes in Value Relevance Over the Last Four Decades.” Working Paper, Northwestern University.

Chang

1998. “The Decline in Value Relevance of Earnings and Book Values.” Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.

Collins

D. W.

Maydew

Weiss

. 1997. “Changes in the Value-Relevance of Earnings and Book Values Over the Past Forty Years”. Journal of Accounting and Economics (December): 39–68.

Dechow

Hutton

Sloan

. 1999. “An Empirical Assessment of the Residual Income Valuation Model”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26 (1–3): 1–34.

Easton

1998. “Discussion of Revalued Financial, Tangible, and Intangible Assets: Association with Share Prices and Non-Market-Based Value Estimates”. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement): 235–247.

Easton

Sommers

. 1999. “Tests of a Relation between Price and Financial Statement Data.” Working Paper, Ohio State University.

Feltham

Ohlson

J. A.

. 1995. “Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities,” Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 689–731.

10.

Francis

Schipper

. 1998. “Have Financial Statements Lost Their Relevance?” Working Paper, University of Chicago.

11.

Guenther

D. A.

Trombley

M. A.

. 1994. “The 'LIFO' Reserve and the Value of the Firm: Theory and Empirical Evidence”. Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 433–452.

12.

Hand

Landsman

. 1998. “Testing the Ohlson Model: v or not v, that is the Question.” Working Paper, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

13.

Kemsley

1999. “Valuation of the Debt-Tax Shield.” Working Paper, Columbia University.

14.

Liu

Thomas

. 2000. “Stock Returns and Accounting Earnings”. Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 1–31.

15.

Monahan

1999. “Conservativism, Growth and the Role of Accounting Numbers in the Equity Valuation Process.” Working Paper, University of North Carolina.

16.

Myers

1999. “Implementing Residual Income Valuation with Linear Information Dynamics”. Accounting Review (January): 1–29.

17.

Ohlson

1995. “Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation”. Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 661–687.

18.

Ohlson

1998. “Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation: An Empirical Perspective.” Working Paper, New York University.

19.

Ohlson

1999. “Discussion of ‘An Analysis of Historical and Future-Oriented Information in Accounting-Based Security Valuation Models.’” Contemporary Accounting Research (Summer): 381–384.

20.

Sougiannis

1994. “The Accounting Based Valuation of Corporate R&D”. Accounting Review (January): 44–68.

21.

Stober

1998. “Do Prices Behave as if Accounting Book Values Are Conservative? Cross-Sectional Tests of the Feltham-Ohlson (1995) Valuation Model.” Working Paper, University of Notre Dame.

22.

Zhang

X.-J.

1998. “Conservative Accounting and Equity Valuation.” Working Paper, University of California at Berkeley.

The Feltham-Ohlson (1995) Model: Empirical Implications

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References