This study investigates the demand for audit quality for the firms being audited by Laventhol and Horwath (LH) at the time LH declared bankruptcy. The demand for audit quality by the former LH clients is inferred from their decisions to select Big Six or non–Big Six auditors. Because the change in auditors was involuntary, the sample avoids self-selection issues associated with voluntary auditor switches. LH clients that selected Big Six auditors tended to be more highly leveraged, have less management ownership, and issue more securities in the year after selecting the new auditor than LH clients that selected non–Big Six auditors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanE.1968. “Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis, and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy”. Journal of Finance, 23 (September): 589–609.
2.
BeattyR.1989. “Auditor Reputation and the Pricing of Initial Public Offerings”. The Accounting Review, 64 (October): 693–709.
3.
BertonL.1990a. “Laventhol and Horwath Faces More Woes as It Loses Unit and Key Executives”. The Wall Street Journal (May 14): A3.
4.
BertonL.1990b. “Laventhol and Horwath Beset by Litigation Runs into Hard Times”. The Wall Street Journal (May 17): A1.
5.
ChowC.1982. “The Demand for External Auditing: Size. Debt and Ownership Influences”. The Accounting Review, 57 (April): 272–291.
6.
ClarksonP.SimunicD.. 1994. “The Association between Audit Quality, Retained Ownership and Firm-Specific Risk in U.S. vs. Canadian IPO Markets”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17 (January): 207–228.
7.
DatarS.FelthamG.HughesJ.. 1991. “The Role of Audits and Audit Quality in Valuing New Issues”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14 (March): 3–49.
8.
DeAngeloL.1981a. “Auditor Independence, 'Low Balling' and Disclosure Regulation”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3 (August): 113–127.
9.
DeAngeloL.1981b. “Auditor Size and Audit Quality”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3 (December): 183–199.
10.
DeFondM.1992. “The Association Between Changes in Client Firm Agency Costs and Auditor Switching”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 11 (Spring): 16–31.
11.
EichenseherJ.ShieldsD.. 1989. “Corporate Capital Structure and Auditor ‘Fit.’”Advances in Accounting (Supplement 1): 39–56.
12.
FelthamG. A.HughesJ. S.SimunicD. A.. 1991. “Empirical Assessment of the Impact of Auditor Quality on the Valuation of New Issues”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14 (December): 375–399.
13.
FrancisJ.WilsonE.. 1988. “Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation”. The Accounting Review, 63 (October): 663–682.
14.
HealyP. M.LysT.. 1986. “Auditor Changes Following Big Eight Takeovers of Non-Big Eight Audit Firms”. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 5 (Winter): 251–265.
15.
JohnsonW.LysT.. 1990. “The Market for Audit Services”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12 (January): 281–308.
16.
KnappM.1991. “Factors That Audit Committee Members Use as Surrogates for Audit Quality”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10 (Spring): 35–52.
17.
MenonK.WilliamsD.. 1994. “The Insurance Hypothesis and Market Prices”. The Accounting Review, 69 (April): 327–342.
18.
MorckR.SchleiferA.VishnyR.. 1988. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis”. Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (January–March): 293–315.
19.
PalmroseZ.1984. “The Demand for Quality Differentiated Audit Services in an Agency Setting; an Empirical Investigation.” Sixth Illinois Auditing Research Symposium.
20.
PalmroseZ.1988. “An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality”. The Accounting Review, 63 (January): 55–73.
21.
SimonD.FrancisJ.. 1988. “The Effects of Auditor Change on Audit Fees: Tests of Price Cutting and Price Recovery”. The Accounting Review, 63 (April): 255–269.
22.
SimunicD.SteinM.. 1987. “Product Differentiation in Auditing: Auditor Choice in the Market for Unseasoned New Issues.” Canadian Certified General Accountants' Research Foundation. Vancouver, Canada.
23.
TeohS.WongT.. 1993. “Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient”. The Accounting Review, 68 (April): 346–366.
24.
TitmanS.TruemanB.. 1986. “Information Quality and the Valuation of New Issues”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8 (June): 159–172.
25.
WattsR.ZimmermanJ.. 1983. “Agency Problems. Auditing, and the Theory of the Firm: Some Evidence”. Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (October): 613–633.
WoottonC. W.TongeS. D.. 1993. “Where Do Clients Go When an Accounting Firm Goes Bankrupt?: The Case of Laventhol & Horwath”. Abacus, 29 (September): 149–159.
