CowartDavid. Literary Symbiosis: The Reconfigured Text in Twentieth-Century Writing. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1993.
2.
ElwinMalcolm. “The Strange Case of Robert Louis Stevenson.”The Definitive Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Companion. Ed. GeduldHarry M., New York: Garland, 1983.
3.
FoucaultMichel. “The Discourse on Language.”Critical Theory since 1945. Ed AdamsHazard and SearleLeroy. Tallahassee: UP of Florida, 1986. 148–62.
4.
FraustinoDaniel. “The Not So Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.”Journal of Evolutionary Psychology5. 3–4 (1984): 205–09.
5.
KakutaniMichiko. “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, as Observed by the Maid.”New York Times 26 Jan. 1990: 28C.
6.
KreitzerLarry. “R. I. Stevenson's Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and Romans 7:14–25: Images of Duality in Human Nature.”Literature and Theology6. 2 (1992): 125–44.
7.
MartinValerie. Mary Reilly. New York: Simon, 1990.
8.
McLellanDavid. Marxism and Religion: A Description and Assessment of the Marxist Critique of Christianity. New York: Harper, 1987.
9.
“Rock.”Robert Louis Stevenson: The Critical Heritage. Ed. MaixnerPaul. London: Routledge, 1980. 224–27.
10.
StevensonRobert Louis. The Letters of Robert Louis Stevenson, volume II (1880–1887). Ed. ColvinSidney. 5th ed.London: Methuen, 1921.
11.
StevensonRobert LouisThe Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Mahwah: Watermill, 1980.
12.
ThorpeDouglas. “Calvin, Darwin, and the Double: The Problem of Divided Nature in Hogg, MacDonald, and Stevenson.”Newsletter of the Victorian Studies Association of Western Canada11. 1 (1985): 6–22.
