A yet unobserved theme linking the Miller’s and Reeve’s Tales is curiositas, a vice medieval theologians often identified with the second of the triadic sins of 1 John 2:16, the lust of the eyes, and aligned with the other two triadic sins, the lust of the flesh and the pride of life. In the two tales, Chaucer modifies the conception of curiositas by democratizing the usually highbrow, clerkly vice. Particularly through punning, Chaucer shows that all, including the readers of the Tales, are susceptible to the vice by virtue of its likeness to the two other triadic sins.
The Acts of Peter. Trans. M. R. James. The Apocryphal New Testament. Ed. J. K. Elliott. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. 390–426. Print.
2.
AloniGila (2006) Extimacy in the Miller’s Tale. Chaucer Review41.2: 163–84. Print.
3.
Aquinas. The De Malo of Thomas Aquinas. Trans. Richard Regan. Ed. Brian Davies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.
4.
Aquinas. Summa Theologiæ. Trans. the Fathers of the English Dominican Province: Summa Theologiæ. 5 vols. Allen, TX: Christian Classics, 1981. Print.
5.
Augustine. On Christian Teaching. Trans. R. P. H. Green. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Print.
6.
Augustine. The Confessions. Trans. Maria Boulding. Hyde Park: New City Press, 1997. Print.
7.
Augustine. On the Morals of the Catholic Church. Trans. Richard Stothert. A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. Vol. 4. Buffalo, 1887. Print.
8.
Augustine. Of True Religion. Trans. J. H. S. Burleigh. South Bend: Gateway Editions, 1959. Print.
9.
BairdJoseph (1969) The Devil’s Privetee. NeuphilologischeMitteilungen70: 104–6. Print.
10.
BaylorJeffrey (1990) The Failure of the Intellect in Chaucer’s ‘Reeve’s Tale.’. English Language Notes28.1: 17–9. Print.
11.
BennettJ. A. W (1974) Chaucer at Oxford and at Cambridge, Oxford: Oxford University PressPrint.
12.
Bernard (1920) St. Bernard’s Sermons on the Canticle of CanticlesVol. 1Dublin: Browne and NolanPrint.
13.
Bernard. On the Steps of Humility and Pride. Trans. M. Ambrose Conway. The Works of Bernard of Clairvaux: Treatises II, Vol. 5. Washington, D.C.: Consortium Press, 1973. Print.
14.
Blumenberg, Hans. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Trans. Robert Wallace. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983. Print.
15.
Boyd, David. “Seeking ‘Goddes Pryvetee’: Sodomy, Quitting, and Desire in The Miller's Tale”. In: Baker, Peter and Howe, Nicholas, eds Words and Works: Studies in Medieval English Language and Literature in Honour of Fred C. Robinson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998. 243–60. Print.
16.
BrownPeter (1980) The Containment of Symkyn: The Function of Space in the ‘Reeve’s Tale.’. Chaucer Review14.3: 225–36. Print.
17.
Brown, Peter. “‘Shot Wyndowe’ (Miller’s Tale, I.3358 and 3695): An Open and Shut Case?” Medium Ævum 69 (2000): 96–103. Print.
18.
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales. The Riverside Chaucer. Ed. Larry Benson. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton, 1987. Print.
19.
ClarkRoy (1976) Christmas Games in Chaucer’s The Miller’s Tale. Studies in Short Fiction13: 277–87. Print.
20.
CurryWalter (1960) Chaucer and the Medieval Sciences, 2nd ed. New York: Barnes & NoblePrint.
21.
Dante. Inferno. Trans. Robert and Jean Hollander. New York: Anchor, 2002. Print.
22.
DastonLorraineParkKatharine (1998) Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750, New York: Zone BooksPrint.
23.
DempsterGermaine (1959) Dramatic Irony in Chaucer, New York: Humanities PressPrint.
24.
Emmerson, Richard. “‘Coveitise to Konne,’ ‘Goddes Pryvetee,’ and Will's Ambiguous Dream Experience in Piers Plowman.” In: Vaughan, Míceál, ed “Suche Werk is to Werche”: Essays on Piers Plowman in Honor of David C. Fowler. East Lansing: Colleagues Press, 1993. 89–131. Print.
25.
FarrellThomas (1989) Privacy and the Boundaries of Fabliau in The Miller’s Tale. ELH56.4: 773–95. Print.
26.
FisherJohn (1977) Complete Poetry and Prose of Geoffrey Chaucer, New York: Holt, Rinehart and WinstonPrint.
27.
GallacherPatrick (1983) Perception and Reality in the ‘Miller’s Tale.’. Chaucer Review18.1: 38–48. Print.
28.
GardnerJohn (1977) The Poetry of Chaucer, Carbondale: SIUPPrint.
29.
GoodallPeter (1991) ‘Allone, withouten any compaignye’: Privacy in the First Fragment of the Canterbury Tales. English Language Notes29.2: 5–15. Print.
30.
GriffithsPaul (2006) The Vice of Curiosity: An Essay on Intellectual Appetite, Winnipeg: Canadian Mennonite University PressPrint.
31.
Guillaume de Lorris and Jean de Meun. The Romance of the Rose. 3rd ed. Trans. Charles Dahlberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995. Print.
32.
HanksThomas Jr (1984) ‘Goddes Pryvetee’ and Chaucer’s Miller’s Tale. Christianity and Literature33.2: 7–12. Print.
33.
Hanning, R. H. “Telling the Private Parts: ‘Pryvetee’ and Poetry in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales.” The Idea of Medieval Literature. Ed. James M. Dean and Christian K. Zacher. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1992. 108–25. Print.
34.
HattonThomas (1993) Chaucer’s Miller’s Curious Characters. Proceedings of the Medieval Association of the Midwest2: 81–9. Print.
35.
HerzmanRonald (1982) The ‘Reeve’s Tale,’ Symkyn, and Simon the Magician. American Benedictine Review33: 325–33. Print.
36.
HowardDonald (1966) The Three Temptations: Medieval Man in Search of the World, Princeton: Princeton University PressPrint.
37.
Johnston, Andrew James. “The Exegetics of Laughter: Religious Parody in Chaucer’s Miller’s Tale.” A History of English Laughter: Laughter from Beowulf to Beckett and Beyond. Ed. Manfred Pfister. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2002. 17–33. Print.
38.
KendrickLaura (1988) Chaucerian Play: Comedy and Control in the Canterbury Tales, Berkeley: University of California PressPrint.
39.
KlassenNorman (1995) Chaucer on Love, Knowledge and Sight, Cambridge: D.S. BrewerPrint.
40.
KolveV. A (1984) Chaucer and the Imagery of Narrative: The First Five Canterbury Tales, Stanford: Stanford University PressPrint.
41.
LancashireIan (1972) Sexual Innuendo in the ‘Reeve’s Tale.’. Chaucer Review6.3: 159–70. Print.
42.
LochrieKarma (1990) Covert Operations: The Medieval Uses of Secrecy, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressPrint.
43.
Lotario dei Segni (Pope Innocent III). De miseria condicionis humane. Ed. and trans. Robert E. Lewis. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1978. Print.
44.
MannJill (1973) Chaucer and Medieval Estates Satire, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressPrint.
45.
NewhauserRichard (2007) Sin: Essays on the Moral Tradition in the Western Middle Ages, Aldershot: AshgatePrint.
46.
NeussPaula (1974) Double-Entendre in the Miller’s Tale. Essays in Criticism24.4: 325–40. Print.
47.
OlsonPaul (1986) The Canterbury Tales and the Good Society, Princeton: Princeton University PressPrint.
48.
RowlandBeryl (1971) Blind Beasts: Chaucer’s Animal World, Kent, OH: Kent State University PressPrint.
49.
Rowland, Beryl. “Chaucer’s Blasphemous Churl: A New Interpretation of the Miller’s Tale.” Chaucer and Middle English Studies in Honor of Rossell Hope Robbins. Ed. Rowland. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1974. 43–55. Print.
50.
Severs, J. Burke. “Chaucer’s Clerks.” Chaucer and Middle English Studies in Honour of Rossell Hope Robbins. Ed. Beryl Rowland. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1974. 140–52. Print.
51.
StanburySarah (1994) Women’s Letters and Private Space in Chaucer. Exemplaria6.2: 272–85. Print.
52.
TachauKatherine (1998) God’s Compass and Vana Curiositas: Scientific Study in the Old French Bible Moralisée. Art Bulletin80.1: 7–33. Print.
53.
ThroA (1970) Booker. “Chaucer’s Creative Comedy: A Study of the ‘Miller’s Tale’ and the “Shipman’s Tale.’. Chaucer Review5.2: 97–111. Print.
54.
WatsonMichael (1989) Variations on a Theme: Secrecy in Chaucer’s Fabliaux. In Geardagum10: 29–49. Print.
55.
WoodsWilliam (1994) Private and Public Space in the Miller’s Tale. Chaucer Review29.2: 166–78. Print.
56.
Woods, William. “Symkyn’s Place in the ‘Reeve’s Tale.’” Chaucer Review 39.1 (2004): 17–40. Print.
57.
ZacherChristian (1976) Curiosity and Pilgrimage: The Literature of Discovery in Fourteenth-Century England, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressPrint.
