Recent scholarship on John Milton argues that Milton rejected the popular Reformation understanding of Christ's atonement, the penal-substitutionary theory of atonement, and that Milton was uncomfortable with the Crucifixion of Jesus as God's means of human salvation. A close reading of Milton's Paradise Lost and De Doctrina Christiana clearly shows, however, that Milton did in fact embrace the penal-substitutionary theory of atonement, and he believed that Jesus' death on the cross effected this atonement. Milton's decision not to dwell on the cross or the details of the crucifixion in his poetry does not manifest a rejection of the cross as God's means of effecting atonement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
The Bible: Authorized King James Version with Apocrypha. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997.
2.
ChaplinGregory. “Beyond Sacrifice: Milton and the Atonement.”PMLA125.2 (March 2010): 354–69.
3.
HallDouglas John. The Cross in Our Context: Jesus and the Suffering World. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003.
4.
HermanPeter C.Destabilizing Milton: Paradise Lost and the Poetics of Incertitude. New York: Palgrave, 2005.
5.
HillierRussel M.“The Wreath, the Rock and the Winepress: Passion Iconography in Milton's Paradise Regained.”Literature & Theology22.4 (2008): 387–405.
6.
HuttarCharles. “The Passion of Christ in Paradise Regained.”English Language Notes19.3 (1982): 236–60.
7.
LiebMichael. Theological Milton: Deity, Discourse and Heresy in the Miltonic Canon. Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP, 2006.
8.
LoewensteinDavid. “From Politics to Faith in the Great Poems?”Visionary Milton: Essays on Prophecy and Violence. Ed. MedinePeter E.ShawcrossJohn T.UrbanDavid V., Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP, 2010. 269–85.
9.
MiltonJohn. Complete Poems and Major Prose. Ed. HughesMerritt Y., New York: Odyssey, 1957.
10.
MiltonJohn. The Complete Prose Works of John Milton. Ed. WolfeDon M.New Haven: Yale UP, 1953–82. 8 vols.
11.
MiltonJohn. De doctrina Christiana. Milton, Complete Prose Works6: 117–807.
12.
MiltonJohn. Of True Religion. Milton, Complete Prose Works8: 417–40.
13.
PatridesC. A.Milton and the Christian Tradition. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1966.
RogersJohn. “Milton's Circumcision.”Milton and the Grounds of Contention. Ed. KelleyMark R.LiebMichaelShawcrossJohn T., Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP, 2003. 188–213.
16.
RosenblattJason P.Torah and Law in Paradise Lost. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1994.
17.
SchoenfeldtMichael. “‘;That spectacle of too much weight”: The Poetics of Sacrifice in Donne, Herbert, and Milton.”Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies31.3 (Fall 2001): 561–84.
18.
ShoulsonJeffrey S.Milton and the Rabbis: Hebraism, Hellenism, & Christianity. New York: Columbia UP, 2001.
19.
ShoulsonJeffrey S.“The King and I: The Stance of Theodicy in Midrash and Paradise Lost.”Milton Studies36 (1998): 59–85.
20.
SloyanGerard S.Why Jesus Died. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995.
21.
StrierRichard. “Milton against humility.”Religion and Culture in Renaissance England. Ed. McEachernClaireShugerDebra. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. 258–86.
22.
TillichPaul. The Courage to Be. New Haven: Yale UP, 1952.
23.
TeskeyGordon. “A Retrograde Reading of Spenser's Fowre Hymnes.”Spenser Studies: A Renaissance Poetry Annual24 (2009): 481–97.
24.
TrelstadMarit, ed. Cross Examinations: Readings on the Meaning of the Cross Today. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2006.
25.
UrbanDavid V.“On Christian Doctrine: Teaching the Conflict and What's at Stake.”Approaches to Teaching Milton's Shorter Poetry and Prose, Ed. HermanPeter C., New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 2007. 235–41.
26.
WittreichJoseph. Why Milton Matters: A New Preface to His Writings. New York: Palgrave, 2006.
