Robinson Crusoe's conversion plot in Daniel Defoe's 1719 Robinson Crusoe bears striking similarity to Augustine's conversion plot in Confessions, especially in the ways Bible-reading is narrated as transforming the ontological nature of each “character's” self. This essay argues that while both Crusoe and Augustine employ typological hermeneutics while reading the Bible, their hermeneutics are informed by vastly different ontological, epistemological, and ethical assumptions and emphases. Dissecting and outlining Crusoe's “modern novelistic” typology and comparing it to Augustine's “premodern” typology reveals some theological limitations of modern reading practices that have long influenced how readers approach both novels and the Bible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmstrongNancy. How Novels Think: The Limits of British Individualism from 1719–1900. New York: Columbia UP, 2005.
2.
AuerbachErich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. TraskWillard R., Princeton: Princeton UP, 1953.
DefoeDaniel. Robinson Crusoe. New York: Modern Library, 2001.
13.
EdenKathy. “The Rhetorical Tradition and Augustinian Hermeneutics in De doctrina Christiana,”Rhetorica, 8:1 (1990): 45–63.
14.
EganJames. “Crusoe's Monarchy and the Puritan Concept of the Self,”Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900. 13:3 (1973): 451–60.
15.
FreiHans W.The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study of Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale UP, 1974.
16.
GaldonJoseph A.Typology and Seventeenth-Century Literature. The Hague: Mouton, 1975.
17.
HanbyMichael. Augustine and Modernity. New York: Routledge, 2003.
18.
HendersonHeather. The Victorian Self: Autobiography and Biblical Narrative. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1989.
19.
HunterJ. Paul. The Reluctant Pilgrim: Defoe's Emblematic Method and Quest for Form in Robinson Crusoe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1966.
20.
JeffreyDavid. Houses of the Interpreter: Reading Scripture, Reading Culture. Waco: Baylor UP, 2003.
21.
KimSharon. “Puritan Realism: The Wide, Wide World and Robinson Crusoe,”American Literature, 75:4 (2003): 783–811.
22.
KorshinPaul. Typologies in England, 1650–1820. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1982.
23.
LewisPericles. Religious Experience and the Modernist Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2010.
24.
LuxonThomas H.Literal Figures: Puritan Allegory and the Reformation Crisis in Representation. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1995.
25.
ManningStephen. “Scriptural Exegesis and the Literary Critic” in Bercovitch: 47–66.
26.
MartensPeter W.“Revising the Allegory/Typology Distinction: The Case of Origen,”Journal of Early Christian Studies, 16:3 (2008): 283–317.
27.
McInellyBrett C.“Expanding Empires, Expanding Selves: Colonialism, the Novel, and Robinson Crusoe,”Studies in the Novel, 35:1 (2003): 1–21.
28.
MinerEarl, ed. Literary Uses of Typology from the Late Middle Ages to the Present. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1977.
29.
NewMelvyn. “‘The Grease of God’: The Form of Eighteenth-Century English Fiction,”PMLA, 91:2 (1976): 235–44.
30.
PrangerM.B.“Time and Narrative in Augustine's Confessions,”The Journal of Religion, 81:3 (2001): 377–93.
31.
PreusJ. Samuel. “Secularizing Divination: Spiritual Biography and the Invention of the Novel,”Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 59:3 (1991): 441–66.
32.
RichettiJohn J.The Life of Daniel Defoe: A Critical Biography. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.
33.
SeidelKevin. “Robinson Crusoe as Defoe's Theory of Fiction,”Novel: A Forum on Fiction, 44:2 (2011): 165–85.
34.
StarrGeorge. Defoe and Spiritual Autobiography. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1965.
35.
TaylorCharles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1989.
36.
WattIan. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding. Berkeley: U of California P, 1957.
