How to govern a state in a Christian way is a question central to Shakespeare's Measure for Measure. In the play, Duke Vincentio is often thought to demonstrate the importance of tempering justice with mercy, in contrast with the rigid legalism of his deputy Angelo. This essay argues instead that like Angelo and the Puritans of Shakespeare's day, the Duke's governance conflates spiritual with temporal law and personal sin with public crime. Only the novice Isabella perceives both the similarity and consequences of their thinking and rejects it in favor of a more traditional political theology that refuses to make Christ's spiritual teachings into legal requirements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartonAnne. Introduction. Measure for Measure. The Riverside Shakespeare. 2nd ed. Ed. EvansG. Blakemore. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997. 579–83.
2.
BawcuttN. W.‘“He who the sword of heaven will bear’: The Duke versus Angelo in Measure for Measure.”Shakespeare Survey37 (1984): 89–98.
3.
BeauregardDavid N.Catholic Theology in Shakespeare's Plays. Newark: U of Delaware P, 2008.
4.
BermanHarold. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1983.
5.
BucerMartin. De regno Christi. Melancthon and Bucer. Ed and trans. PauckWilhelm. Library of Christian Classics 19. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1969. 174–394.
6.
DollimoreJonathan. “Transgression and surveillance in Measure for Measure.”Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985. 72–87.
7.
HoulbrookeRalph. The Church Courts and the People During the English Reformation, 1520–1570. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1979.
8.
JamesVIJamesI. A Meditation upon the 27th, 28th, and 29th Verses of the 27th Chapter of Saint Matthew. Ed. SommervilleJohann P., King James VI and I: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994. 229–49.
9.
KamaralliAnna. “Writing about Motive: Isabella, The Duke, and Moral Authority.”Shakespeare Survery58 (2005): 48–59.
10.
LakePeter. “Ministers, Magistrates and the Production of ‘Order’ in Measure for Measure.”Shakespeare Survey54 (2001): 165–81.
11.
LeavisF. R.“The Greatness of Measure for Measure.”Scrutiny10 (1942): 234–47.
12.
LeverJ. W.Introduction. Measure for Measure. Ed. LeverJ. W., The Arden Shakespeare. London: Methuen, 1965. xi–xcviii.
13.
MagedanzStacy. “Public Justice and Private Mercy in Measure for Measure.”Studies in English Literature44 (2004): 317–32.
14.
MarkusR. A.“The Latin Fathers.”The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, c. 350-c. 1450. Ed. BurnsJ. H., Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1988. 92–122.
15.
MarshallPeter. The Catholic Priesthood and the English Reformation. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1994.
16.
RieferMarcia. “Instruments of Some More Mightier Member”: The Constriction of Female Power in Measure for Measure.”Shakespeare Quarterly35 (1984): 157–69.
17.
ShakespeareWilliam. Measure for Measure. Ed. BawcuttN. W., The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1991.
18.
ShugerDebora Kuller. Political Theologies in Shakespeare's England: The Sacred and the State in Measure for Measure. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001.
19.
ThomasAquinasSaint. On Law, Morality, and Politics. Eds. BaumgarthWilliam P.ReganRichard J. S. J. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1988.
20.
ToveyBarbara. “Wisdom and the Law: Thoughts on the Political Philosophy of Measure for Measure.”Shakespeare's Political Pageant: Essays in Literature and Politics. Eds. AlulisJosephSullivanVickie. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1996. 61–75.
21.
WatsonRobert N.The Rest is Silence: Death as Annihilation in the English Renaissance. Berkeley: U of California P, 1994.
22.
WattJ. A.“Spiritual and Temporal Powers.”The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, c. 350-c. 1450. Ed. BurnsJ. H., Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1988. 367–424.
