The case for individualisation of radiological protection in medicine

Abstract

Medical applications make the largest contribution to radiation exposure of the population from artificial sources. Measurable dose quantities do not reflect harm, so effective dose (E) is used to describe doses to patients. Dose management software can evaluate organ doses from computed tomography (CT) scans and calculate E for reference phantoms, but the use of E for individual patients is not appropriate, as risks of stochastic effects vary with age and sex. There is a desire to have a better indicator of radiation risks to individuals in line with moves towards personalised medicine. This paper considers variations in the relation between E and risk resulting from the use of standard phantoms and differences in age and sex. Anatomical phantoms can be matched to individual patients allowing more realistic estimates of organ doses, and these could eventually be derived directly from CT scan images. The best assessments of organ doses could then be combined with age- and sex-specific coefficients to calculate risks. Since software is being developed through which such individualised doses are achievable, it would be timely for ICRP to provide guidance on the development and application of an individualised dose quantity within the overall system of radiological protection, at least for medical patients.

Keywords

Organ dose Effective dose CT scans Individualised medicine

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ICRP, 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37(2–4).

ICRP, 2009. Adult reference computational phantoms. ICRP Publication 110. Ann. ICRP 39(2).

ICRP, 2021. Dose quantities in radiological protection. Publication 147. Ann. ICRP 50(1).

Lee

Lodwick

Hurtado

., Pafundi

Williams

J.L.

Bolch

W.E.

, 2010. The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry. Phys. Med. Biol. 55(2), 339–63. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155.

Martin

C.J.

Barnard

, 2022. How much should we be concerned about cumulative effective doses in medical imaging? J. Radiol. Prot. 42, 011514. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac31c1.

Martin

C.J.

Harrison

J.D.

Rehani

M.M.

, 2020. Effective dose from radiation exposure in medicine: past, present, and future. Phys. Med. 79, 87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.020.

Rehani

M.M.

Yang

Melick

E.R.

, et al., 2019. Patients undergoing recurrent CT scans: assessing the magnitude. Eur. Radiol. 30(4), 1828–1836. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06523-y.

Shao

Lin

, et al., 2024. Fast prediction of patient-specific organ doses in brain CT scans using support vector regression algorithm. Phys. Med. Biol. 69(2), 025010. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad14c7.