The computation of elementary symmetric functions and their derivatives is an integral part of conditional maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters un der the Rasch model. The conditional approach has the advantages of parameter estimates that are consistent (assuming the model is correct) and statistically rigorous goodness-of-fit tests. Despite these characteristics, the conditional approach has been limited by problems in computing the elementary symmetric functions. The in troduction of recursive formulas for computing these functions and the availability of modem computers has largely mediated these problems; however, detailed documentation of how these formulas work is lacking. This paper describes how various recursion formulas work and how they are used to compute elementary symmetric functions and their derivatives. The availabil ity of this information should promote a more thorough understanding of item parameter estimation in the Rasch model among both measurement specialists and practitioners.
Andersen, E.B. (1970). Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum likelihood estimators. The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 32, (Series B), 283-301.
2.
Andersen, E.B. (1972). The numerical solution of a set of conditional estimation equations. The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 34, (Series B), 42-54.
3.
Bock, R.D., & Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 35, 179-197.
4.
Fischer, G.H. (1973). The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychological, 37, 359-374.
5.
Fischer, G.H. (1974). Einführung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests [Introduction to the theory of psychological tests]. Bern : Huber.
6.
Fischer, G.H. (1995). The linear logistic test model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (chap. 8, pp. 131-155). New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
Fischer, G.H., & Allerup, P. (1968). Rechentchnische fragen zu Raschs eindimensionalem modell [An inquiry into computational techniques for the Rasch model]. In G. H. Fischer (Ed.), Psychologische Testtheorie (chap. 10). Bern: Huber .
8.
Fischer, G.H., & Formann, A.K. (1972). An algorithm and a FORTRAN program for estimating the item parameters of the linear logistic test model (Research Bulletin No. 11). Vienna: Psychologisches Institute der Universitat Wien.
9.
Fischer, G.H., & Ponocny, I. (1994). An extension of the partial credit model with an application to the measurement of change. Psychometrika , 59, 177-192.
10.
Fischer, G.H., & Ponocny, I. (1995). Extending rating scale and partial credit models for assessing change. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (chap. 19, pp. 361-364). New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
Fischer, G.H., & Wild, B. (1988). Program LLTM [Computer program.] Vienna, Austria: Psychologisches Institute derUniversitat Wien.
12.
Formann, A.K. (1986). A note on the computation of the second-order derivatives of the elementary symmetric functions in the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 51, 335-339.
13.
Gustafsson, J.-E. (1977). The Rasch model for dichotomous items: Theory, applications and a computer program. Göteborg, Sweden: The Institute of Education, University of Göteborg. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 154018)
14.
Gustafsson, J.-E. (1980). A solution of the conditional estimation problem for long tests in the Rasch model for dichotomous items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 327-385.
15.
Gustafsson, J.-E. (1990). PML: PC version [Computer program]. Groningen, The Netherlands: iec ProGAMMA.
16.
Jansen, P.G. (1984). Computing the second-order derivatives of the symmetric functions in the Rasch model. Kwantitatieve Methoden , 13, 131-147.
17.
Liou, M. (1994). More on the computation of higher-order derivatives of the elementary symmetric functions in the Rasch model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 53-62.
18.
Liou, M., & Chang, C.-H. (1992). Constructing the exact significance level for a person fit statistic. Psychometrika, 57, 169-181.
19.
MacLane, S., & Birkhoff, G. (1988). Algebra (3rd ed.) New York: Chelsea.
20.
Molenaar, I.W. (1990). PML: User's manual (PC version) [Computer program manual]. Groningen, The Netherlands: iec ProGAMMA.
21.
Rasch, G. (1960/80). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. (Copenhagen, Danish Institute for Educational Research). Expanded edition (1980), with foreword and afterword by B. D. Wright. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
22.
Rasch, G. (1961). On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. In J. Neyman (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics , 4, 321-334. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Seliger, E., & Fischer, G.H. (1994). Program description LRSMG, LRSM, LTTM, LPCM, with applications to scale analysis and measuring change. Vienna, Austria: Psychologisches Institute derUniversitat Wien.
24.
Thissen, D. (1982). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the one-parameter logistic model. Psychometrika, 47, 175-186.
25.
Verhelst, N.D., Glas, C.A.W., & van der Sluis, A. (1984). Estimation problems in the Rasch model: The basic symmetric functions. Computational Statistics Quarterly, 1, 245-262.
26.
Verhelst, N.D., & Veldhuijzen, N.H. (1991). A new algorithm for computing elementary symmetric functions and their first and second derivatives (Measurement and Research Department Reports 91-1). Arnhem, The Netherlands: Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics.
27.
Wright, B.D., & Douglas, G.A. (1977). Conditional versus unconditional procedures for sample-free analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 37, 573-586.
