Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A quadratic curve test equating method for equating different test forms under a random-groups data collec tion design is proposed. This new method extends the linear equating method by adding a quadratic term to the linear function and equating the first three central moments (mean, standard deviation, and skewness) of the test forms. Procedures for implementing the method and related issues are described and discussed. The quadratic curve method was evaluated using real test data and simulated data in terms of model fit and equating error, and was compared to linear equating, and unsmoothed and smoothed equipercentile equat ing. It was found that the quadratic curve method fit most of the real test data examined and that when the model fit the population, this method could perform at least as well as, or often even better than, the other equating methods studied.

Keywords

Index terms: equating,equipercentile equating linear equating model-based equating quadratic curve equating random-groups equating design smoothing procedures.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angoff, W.H. (1987). Technical and practical issues in equating: A discussion of four papers. Applied Psychological Measurement , 11, 291-300.

Braun, H.I. , & Holland, P.W. (1982). Observed score test equating: A mathematical analysis of some ETS equating procedures. In P. W. Holland & D. B. Rubin (Eds.), Test equating (pp. 9-49). New York: Academic Press.

Cope, R.T. , & Kolen, M.J. (1990). A study of methods for estimating distributions of test scores (American College Testing Research Rep. 90-5. Iowa City IA: American College Testing.

Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Philadelphia PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

Fairbank, B.A. (1987). The use of presmoothing and postsmoothing to increase the precision of equipercentile equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 245-262.

Hanson, B.A. (1990). An investigation of methods for improving estimation of test score distributions (American College Testing Research Rep. 90-4. Iowa City IA: American College Testing .

Hanson, B.A. (1992). Description of a program for smoothing univariate test score distributions. Iowa City IA: American College Testing.

Hanson, B.A. , Zeng, L. , & Colton, D. (1991, April). A comparison ofpresmoothing and postsmoothing methods in equipercentile equating. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education , Chicago.

Holland, P.W. , & Thayer, D.T. (1987). Notes on the use of log-linear models for fitting discrete probability distributions (Research Rep. No. 87-31 ). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

10.

Kendall, M. , & Stuart, A. (1977). The advanced theory of statistics. New York: Macmillan.

11.

Kolen, M.J. (1984). Effectiveness of analytic smoothing in equipercentile equating. Journal of Educational Statistics, 9, 25-44.

12.

Kolen, M.J. (1991). Smoothing methods for estimating test score distributions . Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 257-282.

13.

Kolen, M.J. , & Brennan, R.L. (1995). Test equating: Methods and practices. New York: Springer-Verlag.

14.

Livingston, S.A. (1993). Small-sample equating with log-linear smoothing . Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 23-39.

15.

Press, W.H. , Flannery, B.P. , Teukolsky, S.A. , & Vetterling, W.T. (1992). Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Wang, T. , & Kolen, M.J. (1994, April).A quadratic curve equating method to equate the first three moments in equipercentile equating. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

A Quadratic Curve Equating Method to Equate the First Three Moments in Equipercentile Equating

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References