American College Testing. (1993). COMPASS user's guide. Iowa City IA: Author.
2.
Andrich, D. (1978a). A rating formulation for ordered response categories . Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
3.
Andrich, D. (1978b). Application of a psychometric rating model to ordered categories which are scored with successive integers. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 581-594.
4.
Baker, F.B. (1992). Equating tests under the graded response model . Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 87-96.
5.
Baker, F.B. (1993). Equating tests under the nominal response model . Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 239-251.
6.
Balasubramanian, S.K., & Kamakura, W.A. (1989). Measuring consumer attitudes toward the marketplace with tailored interviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 311-326.
7.
Bennett, R. E., & Ward, W. C. (Eds.). (1993). Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement: Issues in constructed response, performance testing, and portfolio assessment. Hillsdale NJ:Erlbaum.
8.
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick, Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397-479). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
9.
Bock, R.D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika, 37, 29-51.
10.
Bock, R.D., & Mislevy, R.J. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431-444.
11.
Brown, J.M., & Weiss, D.J. (1977). An adaptive testing strategyfor achievement test batteries (Research Rep. No. 77-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
12.
Chen, S., Hou, L., Fitzpatrick, S.J., & Dodd, B.G. (1995, April). The effect ofpopulation distribution and methods of theta estimation on CAT using the rating scale model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
13.
College Board. (1993).Accuplacer user's notebook. New York: Author .
14.
Curran, L.T., & Wise, L.L. (1994, August). Evaluation and implementation of CAT-ASVAB . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
15.
De Ayala, R.J. (1989). A comparison of the nominal response model and the three-parameter logistic model in computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 789-805.
16.
De Ayala, R.J. (1992). The nominal response model in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 327-343.
17.
De Ayala, R.J. (1993). An introduction to polytomous item response theory models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development , 25, 172-189.
18.
De Ayala, R.J., Dodd, B.G., & Koch, W.R. (1992). A comparison of the partial credit and graded response models in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 17-34.
19.
Dodd, B.G. (1987, April). Computerized adaptive testing with the rating scale model. Paper presented at the Fourth International Objective Measurement Workshop, Chicago.
20.
Dodd, B.G. (1990). The effect of item selection procedure and stepsize on computerized adaptive attitude measurement using the rating scale model . Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 355-366.
21.
Dodd, B.G., & De Ayala, R.J. (1994). Item information as a function of threshold values in the rating scale model. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Objective measurement. Theory into practice (Vol. 2; pp. 301-317). Norwood NJ : Ablex.
22.
Dodd, B.G., & Koch, W.R. (1987). Effects of variations in item step values on item and test information in the partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 371-384.
23.
Dodd, B.G., & Koch, W.R. (1994). Item and scale information functions for the successive intervals Rasch model. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 54, 873-885.
24.
Dodd, B.G., Koch, W.R., & De Ayala, R.J. (1988, April). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement: A comparison of the graded response and rating scale models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans .
25.
Dodd, B.G., Koch, W.R., & De Ayala, R.J. (1989). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing procedures using the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 129-143.
26.
Dodd, B.G., Koch, W.R., & De Ayala, R.J. (1993). Computerized adaptive testing using the partial credit model: Effects of item pool characteristics and different stopping rules. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 53, 61-77.
27.
Drasgow, F., Levine, M.V., Tsien, S., Williams, B., & Mead, A.D. (1995). Fitting polychotomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Unpublished manuscript.
28.
Educational Testing Service. (1993). GRE 1993-94 guide to the use of the Graduate Record Examinations Program. Princeton NJ: Author.
29.
Frederiksen, N., Mislevy, R. J., & Bejar, I. I. (Eds.). (1993). Test theory for a new generation of tests. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
Green, B.F., Bock, R.D., Humphreys, L.G., Linn, R.L., & Reckase, M.D. (1984). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 347-360.
31.
Henly, S.J., Klebe, K.J., McBride, J.R., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Adaptive and conventional versions of the DAT: The first complete test battery comparison. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 363-371.
32.
Kamakura, W.A., & Balasubramanian, S.K. (1989). Tailored interviewing: An application of item response theory for personality measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 502-519.
33.
Kingsbury, G.G., & Houser, R.L. (1993). Assessing the utility of item response models: Computerized adaptive testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 21-27, 39.
34.
Kingsbury, G.G., & Weiss, D.J. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery testing procedure. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 257-283). New York: Academic Press.
35.
Kingsbury, G.G., & Zara, A.R. (1989). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359-375.
36.
Kingsbury, G.G., & Zara, A.R. (1991). A comparison of procedures for content-sensitive item selection in computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 241-261.
37.
Koch, W.R. (1983). Likert scaling using the graded response model . Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 15-32.
38.
Koch, W.R., & Dodd, B.G. (1985, April). Computerized adaptive attitude measurement . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
39.
Koch, W.R., & Dodd, B.G. (1989). An investigation of procedures for computerized adaptive testing using partial credit scoring. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 335-357.
40.
Koch, W.R., & Dodd, B.G. (in press). An investigation of procedures for computerized adaptive testing using the successive intervals Rasch model. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
41.
Koch, W.R., Dodd, B.G., & Fitzpatrick, S.J. (1990). Computerized adaptive measurement of attitudes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 20-30.
42.
Levine, M.V., Drasgow, F., Williams, B., McCusker, C., & Thomasson, G.L. (1992). Measuring the difference between two models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 261-278.
43.
Lunz, M.E., Bergstrom, B.A., & Wright, B.D. (1992). The effect of review on student ability and test efficiency for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 33-40.
44.
Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174.
Masters, G.N., & Wright, B.D. (1984). The essential process in a family of measurement models. Psychometrika, 49, 529-544.
47.
McBride, J.R., & Martin, J.T. (1983). Reliability and validity of adaptive ability tests in a military setting. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 224-236). New York: Academic Press.
48.
McKinley, R.L., & Reckase, M.D. (1980). Computer applications to ability testing. Association for Educational Data Systems Journal, 13, 193-203.
49.
Muraki, E. (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to Likert-type data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 59-71.
50.
Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159-176.
51.
Reckase, M.D. (1981). Final report: Procedures for criterion referenced tailored testing. Columbia: University of Missouri, Educational Psychology Department.
52.
Reckase, M.D. (1985). The difficulty of test items that measure more than one ability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 401-412.
53.
Reckase, M.D. (1989). Adaptive testing: The evolution of a good idea . Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 11-15.
54.
Reshetar, R.A., Norcini, J.J., & Shea, J.A. (1993, April). A simulated comparison of two content balancing and maximum information item selection procedures for an adaptive certification examination. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Atlanta .
55.
Rost, J. (1988). Measuring attitudes with a threshold model drawing on a traditional scaling concept. Applied Psychological Measurement , 12, 397-409.
56.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent trait ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, No. 17.
57.
Singh, J. (1993, September). Some initial experiments with adaptive survey designs for structured questionnaires. Paper presented at the New Methods and Applications in Consumer Research Conference , Cam-bridge MA.
58.
Singh, J., Howell, R.D., & Rhoads, G.K. (1990). Adaptive designs for Likert-type data: An approach for implementing marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 304-321.
59.
Sympson, J.B. (1983, June). A new IRT model for calibrating multiple choice items. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Los Angeles CA.
60.
Thissen, D.J., & Steinberg, L. (1984). A response model for multiple choice items. Psychometrika, 49, 501-519.
61.
Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1986). Taxonomy of item response models. Psychometrika, 51, 567-577.
62.
Urry, V.W. (1977). Tailored testing: A successful application of latent trait theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 181-196.
63.
Wainer, H., Dorans, N.J., Flaugher, R., Green, B.F., Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
64.
Weiss, D.J. (1981). Final report: Computerized adaptive ability testing . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
65.
Weiss, D.J. (1982). Improving measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 473-492.
66.
Weiss, D.J. (1983). Final report: Computer-based measurement of intellectual capabilities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.
67.
Weiss, D.J. (1985). Final report: Computerized adaptive measurement of achievement and ability. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program .
68.
Zara, A.R. (1988). Introduction to item response theory and computerized adaptive testing as applied in licensure and certification testing. National Clearing-house of Examination Information Newsletter, 6, 11-17.