The delta method was used to derive standard errors (SEs) of the Levine observed score and Levine true score linear equating methods. SEs with a normality assumption as well as without a nor mality assumption were derived. Data from two forms of a test were used as an example to evalu ate the derived SEs of equating. Bootstrap SEs also were computed for the purpose of comparison. The SEs derived without the normality assumption and the bootstrap SEs were very close. For the skewed score distributions, the SEs derived with the normality assumption differed from the SEs derived without the normality assumption and the boot strap SEs.
Angoff, W.H. (1953). Test reliability and effective test length. Psychometrika, 18, 1-14.
2.
Angoff, W.H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed.) (pp. 508-600). Washington DC: American Council on Education.
3.
Braun, H.I., & Holland, P.W. (1982). Observed-score test equating: A mathematical analysis of some ETS equating procedures. In P. W. Holland & D. B. Rubin (Eds.), Test equating (pp. 9-49). New York: Academic Press.
4.
Brennan, R.L. (1990). Congeneric models and Levine's linear equating procedures (American College Testing Research Rep. No. 90-12. Iowa City IA: American College Testing.
5.
Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Philadelphia PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
6.
Feldt, L.S. (1975). Estimation of the reliability of a test divided into two parts of unequal length. Psychometrika, 40, 557-561.
7.
Feldt, L.S., & Brennan, R.L. (1989). Reliability. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.) (pp. 105-146). New York: Macmillan.
8.
Hanson, B.A. (1991). A note on Levine's formula for equating unequally reliable tests using data from the common item nonequivalent groups design . Journal of Educational Statistics, 16, 93-100.
9.
Kendall, M., & Stuart, A. (1977). The advanced theory of statistics (4th ed., Vol. 1). New York: Macmillan.
10.
Kolen, M.J. (1985). Standard errors of Tucker equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 209-223.
11.
Kolen, M.J., & Brennan, R.L. (1987). Linear equating models for the common-item nonequivalent-populations design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 263-277.
12.
Levine, R. (1955). Equating the score scales of alternative forms administered to samples of different ability (RB-55-23. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
13.
Lord, F.M. (1950). Notes on comparable scales for test scores (RB-50-48 . Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
14.
Petersen, N.S., Kolen, M.J., & Hoover, H.D. (1989). Scaling, norming, and equating. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.) (pp. 221-262). New York: Macmillan.
15.
Woodruff, D.J. (1986). Derivations of observed score linear equating methods based on test score models for the common item nonequivalent population design. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 245-257.
16.
Woodruff, D.J. (1989). A comparison of three linear equating methods for the common-item nonequivalent population design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 353-369.
17.
Zeng, L. (1993). A numerical approach for computing standard errors of linear equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 177-186.
