Abstract
The analytical model typically used to perform generalizability analysis assumes that design effects are uncorrelated. Often, the assessment of behavioral data involves designs that employ multiple occa sions or repeated trials (as in many observational and rating studies). In these cases, design effects may be serially correlated. The implications of serially correlated effects on the results of gen eralizability analyses are discussed. Simulated data are provided that demonstrate the biases that serially correlated effects introduce into the results.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
