The Item Log-Likelihood Surface for Two- and Three-Parameter Item Characteristic Curve Models

Abstract

This article investigated the form of item log-likeli hood surface under two- and three-parameter logistic models. Graphs of the log-likelihood surfaces for items under two-parameter and three-parameter (with a fixed value of c) models were very similar, but were characterized by the presence of a ridge. These graphs suggest that the task of finding the maximum of the surface should be roughly equivalent under these two models when c is fixed in the three-parameter model. For two items, the item log-likelihood surface was plotted for several values of c to obtain the contour line of the maxima. For an item whose value of Lord's b — 2/ a index was less than the criterion value, the contour line was relatively flat. The item having an index value above the criterion value had a contour line with a very sharp peak. Thus, under a three-pa rameter model, finding the maximum of the item log- likelihood is more difficult when the criterion for Lord's index is not met. These results confirm that the LOGIST program procedures used to locate the maxi mum of the likelihood function are consistent with the form of the item log-likelihood surface. Index terms: estimation, item parameter; likelihood surfaces; LOGIST procedures; log-likelihood; maximum likelihood estimation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker, F.B. (1987). Methodology review: Item parameter estimation under the one-, two-, and three-parameter logistic models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 111-141.

Baker, F.B. , Harwell, M.R. , & Serlin, R.C. (1982). The problem of initial values in item parameter estimation under item response theory. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick, Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

Hulin, C.L. , Lissak, R.I. , & Drasgow, F. (1982). Recovery of two- and three-parameter logistic item characteristic curves: A monte carlo study. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 249-260.

Kale, B.K. (1962). On the solution of likelihood equations by iteration processes. The multiparameter case. Biometrika, 49, 479-486.

Kolen, M.J. (1981). Comparison of traditional and item response theory methods for equating tests. Journal of Educational Measurement , 18, 1-12.

Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Ree, M.J. (1979). Estimating item characteristic curves. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 371-385.

Swaminathan, H. , & Gifford, J.A. (1983). Estimation of parameters in the three-parameter latent trait model. In D. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing. New York: Academic Press.

10.

Thissen, D. , & Wainer, H. (1982). Some standard errors in item response theory. Psychometrika, 47, 397-412.

11.

Warsavage, B. (1983). An analysis of the shape of the likelihood function of the three parameter logistic item response curve. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal.

12.

Wingersky, M.S. (1983). LOGIST: a program for computing maximum likelihood procedures for logistic test models. In R. K. Hambleton (Ed.), Applications of item response theory . Vancouver: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.

13.

Wingersky, M.S. , Barton, M.A. , & Lord, F.M. (1982). LOGIST user's guide. Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

14.

Wmgersky, M.S. , & Lord, F.M. (1984). An investigation of methods for reducing sampling error in certain IRT procedures. Applied Psychological Measurement , 8, 347-364.