Angoff, W.H. (1966). Can useful general-purpose equivalency tables be prepared for different college admissions tests? In A. Anastasi (Ed.), Testing problems in perspective (pp. 251-264). Washington DC: American Council on Education.
2.
Angoff, W.H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thomdike (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 508-600). Washington DC: American Council on Education. (Reprinted by Educational Testing Service, Princeton NJ, 1984 .)
3.
Angoff, W.H., & Cowell, W.R. (1986). An examination of the assumption that the equating of parallel forms is population-independent. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 327-345.
4.
Brennan, R.L., & Kolen, M.J. (1987). Some practical issues in equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 279-290.
5.
Cook, L.L., & Petersen, N.S. (1987). Problems related to the use of conventional and item response theory equating methods in less than optimal circumstances. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 225-244.
6.
Fairbank, B. (1987). The use of presmoothing and postsmoothing to increase the precision of equipercentile equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 245-262.
7.
Keats, J.A., & Lord, F.M. (1962). A theoretical distribution for mental test scores . Psvchometrika, 27, 59-72.
8.
Kingston, N., Leary, L., & Wightman, L. (1985). An exploratory study of the applicability of item response theory methods to the Graduate Management Admissions Test (RR-85-34) . Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
9.
Kolen, M.J. (1983). Effectiveness of analytic smoothing in equipercentile equating (ACT Technical Bulletin No. 41). Iowa City IA : American College Testing Program.
10.
Kolen, M.J., & Brennan, R.L. (1987). Linear equating models for the common-item nonequivalent-populations design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 263-277.
11.
Levine, R.S. (1955). Equating the score scales of alternate forms administered to samples of different ability (ETS Research Bulletin No. 23). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
