Several techniques to test for group differences in weighted multidimensional scaling (MDS) subject weights have recently been proposed. The present study presents monte carlo results to evaluate the op erating characteristics of two of these with ALSCAL- derived subject weights. The first uses the analysis of angular variation (ANAVA) on raw subject weights. The second applies the analysis of variance (ANOVA) to the flattened subject weights generated by ALSCAL. The ANOVA on flattened weights was less affected by the presence of error and by distortions caused by ALSCAL'S normalization routine than was the ANAVA.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Batschelet, E. (1981). Circular statistics in biology. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Bloxom, B. (1968). Individual differences in multidimensional scaling (Research Bulletin 68-45). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3.
Carroll, J.D., & Chang, J.J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of "Eckart-Young" decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 238-319.
4.
Coxon, A.P.M., & Jones, C.L. (1978). The images of occupational prestige. London: Macmillan.
5.
Horan, C.B. (1969). Multidimensional scaling: Combining observations when individuals have different perceptual structures. Psychometrika , 34, 139-165.
6.
Jones, C.L. (1983). A note on the use of directional statistics in weighted Euclidean distances multidimensional scaling models. Psychometrika, 48, 473-476.
7.
Kirk, R.E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont CA: Brooks/ Cole.
8.
MacCallum, R.C. (1977). Effects of conditionality on INDSCAL and ALSCAL weights. Psychometrika, 42, 297-305.
9.
Mardia, K.V. (1972). Statistics of directional data. New York: Academic Press.
10.
Mardia, K.V. (1975). Distribution theory for the von Mises-Fisher distribution . In G. D. Patil, S. Kotz, & J. K. Ortz (Eds.), Statistical distributions in scientific work (Vol. 1, pp. 113-130). Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
11.
Rodgers, J.L. (1983, July). The validity of the analysis of angular variation with ALSCAL-derived subject weights: Some Monte Carlo results. Paper presented at the European meeting of the Psychometric Society , Paris, France.
12.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1982). SAS users guide: Basics. Cary NC: Author.
13.
Schiffman, S.S., Reynolds, M.A., & Young, F.W. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling. New York: Academic Press.
14.
Takane, Y., Young, F.W., & deLeeuw, J. (1977). Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features . Psychometrika, 42, 7-67.
15.
Watson, G.S., & Williams, E.S. (1956). On the construction of significance tests on the circle and the sphere. Biometrika , 43, 344-352.
