A Comparison of Internal,External,and Successive Unfolding Based on Occupational Judgments

Abstract

Successive unfolding is a recently developed tech nique that appears to have advantages over traditional unfolding techniques. To assess its usefulness, succes sive, internal, and a type of external unfolding were compared with regard to the stimulus configurations recovered, the fit of the models as a whole, the fit of individual subjects, and each model's stability in a cross-validation sample. The data were obtained from judgments of similarity of and preference for occupa tional titles. Internal unfolding yielded degenerate so lutions and was dropped from subsequent analyses. External and successive unfolding yielded interpretable dimensions, but the nature of the dimensions uncov ered differed somewhat from one type of unfolding to the other. Both types of unfolding fit the data ade quately for the stimulus configuration, though succes sive unfolding appeared to fit better. The first two di mensions of both models were well reproduced in cross-validation samples. Dimensions beyond the sec ond were more easily cross-validated using external unfolding. Successive unfolding proved superior to ex ternal unfolding in representing preference data as in dicated by the fit of ideal points. Successive unfolding appears a viable method in unfolding research.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett, J.F. , & Hays, W.L. (1960). Multidimensional unfolding: Determining the dimensionality of ranked preference data. Psychometrika, 25, 27-43.

Burton, M. (1972). Semantic dimensions of occupation names. In A. K. Romney , R. N. Shepard , & S. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences (Vol. II. Applications, pp. 55-71). New York: Seminar Press.

Carroll, J.D. (1972). Individual differences and multidimensional scaling . In R. N. Shepard , A. K. Romney , & S. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences (Vol. 1. Theory, pp. 105-155). New York: Seminar Press.

Carroll, J.D. , & Arabie, P. (1980). Multidimensional scaling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 607-649.

Coombs, C.H. (1950). Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement . Psychological Review, 57, 145-158.

Coxon, A.P.M. (1982). The user's guide to multidimensional scaling. Exeter NH: Heineman.

Coxon, A.P.M. , & Jones, C.L. (1978). The images of occupational prestige. New York: St. Martin.

Coxon, A.P.M. , & Jones, C.L. (1979a). Class and hierarchy: The social meaning of occupations . New York: St. Martin.

Coxon, A.P.M. , & Jones, C.L. (1979b). Measurement and meaning: Techniques and methods of studying occupational cognitions. New York: St. Martin.

10.

Davison, M.L. (1976). Fitting and testing Carroll's weighted unfolding model for preferences. Psychometrika, 41, 233-247.

11.

Davison, M.L. (1977). On a metric, unidimensional unfolding for attitudinal and developmental data. Psychometrika, 42, 523-548.

12.

Davison, M.L. (1983). Multidimensional scaling. New York: Wiley.

13.

Drasgow, F. , & Jones, L.E. (1979). Multidimensional scaling of derived dissimilarities . Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 227-244.

14.

Golledge, R.G. , & Rayner, J.N. (1982). Proximity and preference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

15.

Hodge, R.W. , & Saegel, P.M. , & Rossi, P.H. (1968). Occupational prestige in the United States, 1925-1963 : In D. G. Zytowski (Ed.), Vocational behavior: Readings in theory and research (pp. 86-95). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

16.

Kraus, V. , Schild, E.O. , & Hodge, R.W. (1978). Occupational prestige in the collective conscience . Social Forces, 56, 900-918.

17.

Kruskal, J.B. , & Wish, W. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.

18.

Nygren, T.E. , & Jones, L.E. (1977). Individual differences in perceptions and preferences for political candidates. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 13, 182-197.

19.

Reeb, M. (1959). How people see jobs: A multidimensional analysis . Occupational Psychology, 33, 1-17.

20.

Reeb, M. (1971). Multidimensional perceptions by counselors and 14-year-old boys of suitability for jobs, and their prestige and desirability . Occupational Psychology, 45, 233-242.

21.

Reeb, M. (1974). The perceptions of occupational structure—an intervening variable in vocational behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 4, 125-137.

22.

Reeb, M. (1979). Occupational perception and school stream in relation to job classifications, preferences, and prestige for 17-year-old girls and boys. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 113-127.

23.

Rogers, J.L. , & Young, F.W. (1981). Successive unfolding of family preferences. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 51-62.

24.

Rosenberg, S. , Nelson, C. , & Vivekananthan, P.S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294.

25.

Rounds, J.B., Jr. , & Zevon, M.A. (1983). Multidimensional scaling research in vocational psychology. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 491-510.

26.

Schiffman, S.S. , Reynolds, M.L. , & Young, F.W. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling. New York: Academic Press.

27.

Schubsachs, A.P.W. , & Davison, M.L. (1979). Individual differences in perceptions of occupations and occupational reinforcers. Journal of Occupational Psychology , 52, 299-310.

28.

Siess, T.F. , & Rogers, T.B. (1974). Roe's classification and the multidimensional nature of occupational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 4, 403-415.

29.

Sjöberg, L. (1980). Similarity and correlation. In E. D. Lantermann & H. Feger (Eds.), Similarity and choice (pp. 70-87). Bern , Switzerland: Hans Huber.

30.

Takane, Y. , Young, F. , & de Leeuw, J. (1977). Non-metric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features . Psychometrika, 42, 7-67.