Several measurement problems were identified in the literature concerning the fidelity with which the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) assesses psychopathology. A straightforward solution to some of these problems is to develop an orthogonal basis in the MMPI; however, there are 550 items, and this is a cumbersome task even for modern computers. The method of alternating least squares was employed to yield a singular value decomposition of these measures on 682 prison inmates. Unsystematic or sample-specific error variance was minimized through a two-stage least squares split thirds replication design. The relative explanatory power of models of psychopathology based on external, internal, naive, and construct-oriented measurement strategies is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashton, S.G., & Goldberg, L.R.In response to Jackson's challenge: The comparative validity of personality scales constructed by the external (empirical) strategy and scales developed intuitively by experts, novices and laymen. Journal of Research in Personality, 1973, 7, 1-20.
2.
Bentler, P.M., Jackson, D.N., & Messick, S.Identification of content and style: A two-dimensional interpretation of acquiescence . Psychological Bulletin,1971, 76, 186-204.
3.
Block, J.The challenge of response sets. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.
Chambers, J.M.Computational methods for data analysis. New York: John Wiley, 1977.
7.
Cattell, R.B.The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1966, 1, 245-276.
8.
Cattell, R.B., & Vogelman, S.A comprehensive trial of the scree and KG criteria for determining the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1977, 12, 289-325.
9.
Dahlstrom, W.G., Welsh, G.S., & Dahlstrom, L.E.An MMPI handbook. Vol. 1: Clinical interpretation . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1972.
10.
Dahlstrom, W.G., Welsh, G.S., & Dahlstrom, L.E.An MMPI handbook. Vol. 2: Research applications . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975.
11.
Dwyer, P.S.The determination of factor loadings of a given test from the known factor loadings of other tests. Psychometrika, 1937 ,2, 173-178.
12.
Edwards, A.L.The measurement of personality traits by scales and inventories. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1970.
Goldberg, L.R.Parameters of personality inventory construction and utilization: A comparison of prediction strategies and tactics. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, 1975, 2, 1-59.
15.
Gorsuch, R.L.Factor score reliability and domain validities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980, 40, 895-897.
16.
Harshman, R.A.Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-modal factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics , 1970, 16, 1-84.
17.
Harshman, R.A., & Berenbaum, S.A.Basic concepts underlying the PARAFAC-CANDECOMP three-way factor analysis model and its application to longitudinal data. In D. H. Eichorn, P. H. Mussen, J. A. Clausen, N. Haan, & M. P. Honzik (Eds.), Present and past in middle life. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
18.
Harshman, R.A., & Lundy, M.The PARAFAC analysis package: A set of portable programs for three-way factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Branch of the Classification Society . Toronto, Ontario, June 1981.
19.
Hase, H.D., & Goldberg, L.R.Comparative validity of different strategies of constructing personality inventory scales. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 231-248.
20.
Henrysson, S.Gathering, analyzing, and using data on test items. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement. Washington DC: American Council on Education, 1971.
21.
Holden, R.R., & Jackson, D.N.Item subtlety and face validity in personality assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979, 47, 459-468.
22.
Holden, R.R., & Jackson, D.N.Subtlety, information, and faking effects in personality assessment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1981, 37, 379-386.
23.
Horn, J.L.A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1965, 30, 179-185.
24.
Horn, J.L., Wanberg, K.W., & Appel, M.On the internal structure of the MMPI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1973, 8, 131-171.
25.
Jackson, D.N.Acquiescence response styles: Problems of identification and control. In I. A. Berg (Ed.), Response sets in personality assessment. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
26.
Jackson, D.N.A sequential system for personality scale development. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Jackson, D.N.Structured personality assessment. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of general psychology. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall, 1973.
29.
Jackson, D.N.The relative validity of scales prepared by naive item writers and those based on empirical methods of personality scale construction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1975, 35, 361-370.
30.
Jackson, D.N.Construct validity in personality assessment. In Construct validity in psychological measurement: Proceedings of a colloquium on theory and application in education and employment. Princeton NJ: United States Office of Personnel and Educational Testing Service, 1979.
31.
Jackson, D.N., & Messick, S.Content and style in personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 1955, 55, 243-253.
32.
Jackson, D.N., & Messick, S.Acquiescence and desirability as response determinants of the MMPI. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1961, 21, 771-790.
33.
Jackson, D.N., & Paunonen, S.V.Personality structure and assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 1980, 30, 503-552.
34.
Johnson, J.H., Butcher, J.N., & Null, C.An item level factor analysis of the MMPI. Paper presented at the 16th annual MMPI conference, Honolulu HI, February 1981.
35.
Kaiser, H.F.The varimax criterion for rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika , 1958, 23, 187-200.
Koss, M.P.MMPI item content: Recurring issues. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), New developments in the use of the MMPI . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979.
38.
Kroonenberg, P.M., & De Leeuw, J.Principal components analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms. Psychometrika, 1980, 45, 69-97.
39.
Lushene, R.E.Factor structure of the MMPI item pool. Tallahassee, FL : Unpublished master's thesis, Florida State University , 1967.
40.
Meredith, W.Rotation to achieve factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 1964,29, 187-206.
41.
Messick, S., & Jackson, D.N.Desirability scale values and dispersions for MMPI items. Psychological Reports, 1961, 8, 409-414.
42.
Mulaik, S.A.The foundations offactor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.
Norman, W.T.Psychometric considerations for a revision of the MMPI. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Objective personality assessment: Changing perspectives. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
45.
Nunnally, J.C.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
46.
Paulhus, D.L.Control of social desirability in personality inventories: Principal-factor deletion. Journal of Research in Personality, 1981, 15, 383-388.
47.
Please, N.W.Comparison of factor loadings in different populations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1973, 26, 61-89.
Rogers, T.B.The process of responding to personality items: Some issues, a theory and some research. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs , 1971, 6, 1-66.
50.
Schönemann, P.H.A generalized solution to the orthogonal procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 1-10.
51.
Sechrest, L.J., & Jackson, D.N.Deviant response tendencies: Their measurement and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1963, 23, 33-53.
52.
Steiger, J.H.Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin,1980, 87, 245-251.
53.
Stewart, R.A.C.Factor analysis and rotation of the 566 MMPI items. Social Behavior and Personality, 1974, 2, 147-156.
54.
Voyce, C.D., & Jackson, D.N.An evaluation of a threshold theory for personality assessment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977, 37, 383-408.
55.
Wiggins, J.S.Substantive dimensions of self-report in the MMPI item pool. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80 (Whole No. 630).
56.
Wiggins, J. S. Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1973.
57.
Wold, H.Estimation of principal components and related models by iterative least squares . In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1966.
