Bock, R.D.Contributions of multivariate experimental designs to educational research In R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology.Chicago: Rand McNally , 1966.
3.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W.Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multi-method matrixPsychological Bulletin, 1959 , 56, 81-105.
Conger, A.J., & Conger, J.C.Reliable dimensions for WISC profilesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1975, 35, 847-863.
6.
Conger, A.J., & Lipshitz, R.Measures of reliability for profiles and test batteriesPsychometrika, 1973, 38, 411-427.
7.
Conger, A.J., & Stallard, E.Equivalence among canonical factor analysis, canonical reliability analysis, and principal components analysis: Implications for data reduction of fallible measuresEducational and Psychological Measurement , 1976,36, 619-626.
Harman, H.H.Modern factor analysisChicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
10.
Hays, W.L.Statistics for the social sciences (2nded.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston , 1973.
11.
Kaufman, A.S.Factor analysis of the WISC-R at 11 age levels between 61/ 2 and 161/2 yearsJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975, 43, 135-147.
12.
Kaufman, A.S.A new approach to the interpretation of test scatter on the WISC-RJournal of Learning Disabilities,1976, 9, 160-168. (a)
13.
Kaufman, A.S.Verbal-Performance IQ Discrepancies on the WISC-RJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 739-744. (b)
14.
Littell, W.M.The WISC—A review of a decade of researchPsychological Bulletin, 1960, 57 , 132-162.