A new method for separating affective and de notative meaning subsystems in semantic differen tial ratings of any homogeneous concept domain is developed and illustrated using personality ratings data. Results indicated that Osgood's Evaluation, Potency and Activity dimensions were dominant in the underlying semantic structure of personality conceptions and that four dimensions in the "other" subspace, orthogonal to Affect, were clearly interpretable, "affect-free" descriptive features of personalities. Possible applications of this model to other social and psychological research are dis cussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brown, F.G.Principles of educational and psychological testing. Hinsdale, Illinois: The Dryden Press, 1970 .
2.
Campbell, D.T.Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct. trait or discriminant validity. American Psychologist.1960. 15. 546-553.
3.
Campbell, D.T. and Fiske. D.W.Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait-multi-method matrix . Psychological Bulletin.1959. 56. 81-105.
4.
Harman, H.H.Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1960.
5.
Hogenraad, R. and Tzeng, O.C.S.Affective and denotative meaning systems in natural and built space conceptions . 1976 (in preparation).
6.
Kaiser, H.F.The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958. 23. 187-200.
7.
Kuusinen, J.Affective and denotative structures of personality ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1969 . 12. 181-199.
8.
Lane. S.T.M.Semantic differential scales for Portuguese speakers in Brazil. International Journal of Psychology.1973. 8. 147-152.
9.
Miron, M.S.What is it that is being differentiated by the semantic differential?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1969. 12. 189-193.
10.
Miron, M.S. and Osgood, C.E.Language behavior: The muitivariate structure of qualification. In R. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company, 1966.
11.
Osgood. C.E.Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures . American Anthropologists, 1964, 66(3). 171-200.
12.
Osgood, C.E.On the whys and wherefores of E, P, and A. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1969, 12(3), 194-199.
13.
Osgood. C.E.Exploration in semantic space: A personal diary. The Journal of Social Issues, 1971, 27(4), 5-64.
14.
Osgood, C.E., May, W.H. and Miron, M.S.Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Urbana : University of Illinois Press, 1975.
15.
Osgood. C.E.Suci. G.H. and Tannenbaum, P.H.The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois. 1957.
16.
Saunders, D.R.The rationale for an "oblimax" method of transformation in factor analysis . Psychometrika.1961, 26, 317-324.
Tucker. L.R.Fitting of factor analytic hyperplanes by a personal probability function. A report on techniques for investigation of structure of individual differences in psychological phenomena. Champaign: University of Illinois. Department of Psychology, September. 1970, 39-55.
19.
Tzeng. O.C.S.Differentiation of affective and denotative meaning systems in personality ratings via three-mode factor analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Campaign, 1972. University Microfilms No. 73-17. 454, 278.
20.
Tzeng. O.C.S.Differentiation of affective and denotative meaning systems and their influence in personality ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975, 32. 978-988. (a)
21.
Tzeng, O.C.S.Differentiation of affective and denotative semantic subspace. Paper presented at the Conference on "Issues in Cross-cultural Research." The New York Academy of Science, New York City, October, 1975. (b)
22.
Tzeng. O.C.S.Reliability and validity of semantic differential E-P-A markers for an American English representative sample. Psychological Reports.1975. 37. 292. (c)
23.
Tzeng. O.C.S.Application of semantic differential techniques in social and behavioral science research. The Consortium of International Studies Program. 1976 (in press).
24.
Tzeng. O.C.S. and May, W.H.More than E, P, and A in semantic differential scales: An answer to questions raised by Silvia T. M. Lane. International Journal of Psychology , 1975. 10(2). 101-117.
25.
Tzeng. O.C.S. and Schultze. Q.An application of the semantic differential technique. A review of literature . 1976 (in preparation).
