Abstract
This article presents a Shiny application
Keywords
Introduction
One of the most basic analyses in psychology is the ability to compare groups. However, this seemingly straightforward task is often complicated by two significant challenges: ensuring group equivalence and assessing measurement invariance. If not adequately addressed, these challenges can lead to misleading conclusions and undermine the validity of research findings.
To comprehensively compare groups, analysts should confirm that groups are equivalent on all measures other than what is being compared. If groups are deemed non-equivalent, propensity score analysis can identify a subset of the data that yields equivalent groups. Once equivalent groups have been created, measurement invariance tests should be conducted before comparing groups. If data from the measurement instrument does not demonstrate invariance, any observed differences could reflect differences in interpretation rather than true differences in the variables of interest. If measurement issues yield non-invariance, additional analyses, including the factor ratio test and list-and-delete procedures, can identify subsets of items that can be validly used to compare groups.
We note that propensity score analysis, tests of measurement and structural invariance, and tests of partial invariance are not new to the literature with several articles that speak to these techniques individually but not cohesively. Due to the disparate availability of literature and software, their application can be complex and time-consuming as applied to the analysis of latent means. This can particularly be the case for researchers who are not well-versed in these methods.
Program Description
The
Group equivalency and propensity score analyses are implemented using the
Availability, Documentation, and Distribution
The
The application can also be accessed at evaluent.shinyapps.io/CALMs/.
Footnotes
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
