ChmielewskiM.KuckerS. C. (2020). An MTurk crisis? Shifts in data quality and the impact on study results. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619875149
2.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
3.
GeiserC.LockhartG. (2012). A comparison of four approaches to account for method effects in latent state–trait analyses. Psychological Methods, 17(2), 255–283.
4.
LanceC. E.BaranikL. E.LauA. R.ScharlauE. A. (2009). If it ain’t trait it must be method: (Mis)application of the multitrait-multimethod design in organizational research. In LanceC. E.VandenbergR. J. (Eds), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 337–360). Taylor & Francis.
5.
LanceC. E.DawsonB.BirkelbachD.HoffmanB. J. (2010). Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109352528
6.
LastovickaJ. L.BettencourtL. A.HughnerR. S.KuntzeR. J. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/209552
7.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
8.
SpectorP. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955
9.
SpectorP. E.RosenC. C.RichardsonH. A.WilliamsL. J.JohnsonR. E. (2019). A new perspective on method variance: A measure-centric approach. Journal of Management, 45(3), 855–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316687295
10.
WeijtersB.De BeuckelaerA.BaumgartnerH. (2014). Discriminant validity where there should be none: Positioning same-scale items in separated blocks of a questionnaire. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38(6), 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621614531850