Rasch used a Poisson model to analyze errors and speed in reading tests. An important property of the Poisson distribution is that the mean and variance are equal. However, in social science research, it is very common for the variance to be greater than the mean (i.e., the data are overdispersed). This study embeds the Rasch model within an overdispersion framework and proposes new estimation methods. The parameters in the proposed model can be estimated using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method implemented in WinBUGS and the marginal maximum likelihood method implemented in SAS. An empirical example based on models generated by the results of empirical data, which are fitted and discussed, is examined.
AkaikeH. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In PetrovB. N.CsakeF. (Eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory (pp. 267-281). Budapest, Hungary: Kademiai Kiado.
2.
AkaikeH. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723.
3.
AndrichD. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
4.
BakerF. B. (1998). An investigation of the item parameter recovery characteristics of a Gibbs sampling approach. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 153-169.
5.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (1986). Econometric models based on count data: Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 29-53.
6.
De BoeckP.WilsonM. (2004). Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
7.
EngelJ. (1984). Models for response data showing extra-Poisson variation. Statistica Neerlandica, 38, 159-167.
8.
FoxJ. P.GlasC. A. W. (2001). Bayesian estimation of a multilevel IRT model using Gibbs sampling. Psychometrika, 66, 271-288.
9.
GelmanA.RubinD. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7, 457-472.
10.
GewekeJ. (1992). Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. In BernadoJ. M.BergerJ. O.DawidA. P.SmithA. F. M. (Eds.), Bayesian statistics (Vol. 4, pp. 169-193). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
11.
GeyerC. J. (1992). Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Statistical Science, 7, 473-483.
12.
GlueckJ.MachatR.JiraskoM.RollettB. (2002). Training-related changes in solution strategy in a spatial test: An application of item response models. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 1-22.
13.
GourierouxC.MonfortA.TrognonA. (1984). Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: Applications to Poisson models. Econometrica, 52, 701-720.
14.
HastingsW. K. (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov Chain and their applications. Biometrika, 57, 97-109.
15.
HongS.MinS. Y. (2007). Mixed Rasch Modeling of the Self-Rating Depression Scale: Incorporating latent class and Rasch Rating Scale Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 280-299.
16.
HooglandJ. J.BoomsmaA. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling: An overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 26, 329-367.
17.
HungL. F. (2010). The multigroup multilevel categorical latent growth curve models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 359-392.
JansenM. G. H. (1995). The Rasch Poisson Counts Model for incomplete data: An application of the EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 291-302.
20.
JansenM. G. H. (1997a). The Rasch model for speed tests and some extensions with applications to incomplete designs. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 125-140.
21.
JansenM. G. H. (1997b). Rasch’s model for reading speed with manifest explanatory variables. Psychometrika, 62, 393-409.
22.
JansenM. G. H. (2003). Estimating the parameters of a structural model for the latent traits in Rasch’s model for speed tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 138-151.
23.
JansenM. G. H. (2007). Testing for local dependence in Rasch’s multiplicative gamma model for speed tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32, 24-38.
24.
JansenM. G. H.van DuijnM. A. J. (1992). Extensions of Rasch’s multiplicative Poisson model. Psychometrika, 54, 529-544.
25.
LawlessJ. F. (1987). Negative binomial and mixed Poisson regression. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 15, 171-181.
26.
LindseyJ. K. (1993). Models for repeated measurements. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
27.
LiuJ. S.SabattiC. (2000). Generalised Gibbs sampler and multigrid Monte Carlo for Bayesian computation. Biometrika, 87, 353-369.
28.
MaddalaG. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29.
MantonK. G.WoodburyM. A.StallardE. (1981). A variance components approach to categorical data models with heterogeneous cell populations: Analysis of spatial gradients in lung cancer mortality rates in North Carolina counties. Biometrics, 37, 259-269.
30.
MastersG. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174.
31.
MetropolisN.RosenbluthA. W.RosenbluthM. N.TellerA. H.TellerE. (1953). Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics, 21, 1087-1091.
32.
MeyerJ. P. (2010). A mixture Rasch model with item response time components. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 521-538.
33.
MurakiE. (1997). A generalized partial credit model. In van der LindenW.HambletonR. K. (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (Chap. 9). New York, NY: Springer.
34.
PatzR. J.JunkerB. W. (1999). A straightforward approach to Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for item response models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 146-178.
35.
RaschG. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut.
36.
ReadT. R. C.CressieN. A. C. (1988). Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. New York, NY: Springer.
37.
RobertsG. O.SmithA. F. M. (1993). Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 55, 3-23.
38.
RoskamE. E. C. I. (1987). Towards a psychometric theory of intelligence. In RoskamE. E. Ch. I.SuckR. (Eds.), Progress in mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 151-174). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
39.
RostJ. (1996). Logistic mixture models. In van der LindenW.HambletonR. (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 449-463). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
SchnipkeD. L.ScramsD. J. (2002). Exploring issues of examinee behavior: Insights gained from response-time analyses. In MillsC. N.PotenzaM. T.FremerJ. J.WardW. C. (Eds.), Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments. Mahwah, NJ: (pp. 237-266) Erlbaum.
42.
SchwarzG. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
43.
SpiegelhalterD. J.BestN. G.CarlinB. P.van der LindeA. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 64, 583-640.
44.
SpiegelhalterD. J.ThomasA.BestN.LunnD. (2003). WinBUGS manual version 1.4. Cambridge, England: MRC Biostatistics Unit. Retrieved from http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs
45.
ThallP. F.VailS. C. (1990). Some covariance models for longitudinal count data with overdispersion. Biometrics, 46, 657-671.
46.
van BreukelenG. P. J. (1989). Concentration, speed and precision in mental tests: A psychometric approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
47.
van DuijnM. A. J. (1993). Mixed models for repeated count data. Leiden, Netherlands: DSWO Press.
48.
van DuijnM. A. J.JansenM. G. H. (1995). Modeling repeated count data: Some extensions of the Rasch Poisson Counts Model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 241-258.
49.
WhiteP. O. (1982). Some major components in general intelligence. In EysenckH. J. (Ed.), A model for intelligence (pp. 44-90). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
50.
WollackJ. A.BoltD. M.CohenA. S.LeeY. S. (2002). Recovery of item parameters in the nominal response model: A comparison of marginal maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 337-350.
