The three types (generalized, unweighted, and weighted) of least squares methods, proposed by Ogasawara, for estimating item response theory (IRT) linking coefficients under dichotomous models are extended to the graded response model. A simulation study was conducted to confirm the accuracy of the extended formulas, and a real data study was carried out to compare the performance of the least squares methods with that of moment and characteristic curve linking methods. As found in Ogasawara’s study, the generalized least squares method had the smallest asymptotic standard errors but the largest biases of linking coefficient estimates, whereas the unweighted least squares method had the largest asymptotic standard errors but the smallest biases. The weighted least squares method was intermediate. The comparison study showed that with large samples, the weighted least squares method performed nearly as well as the characteristic curve methods in linking accuracy.
Baker, F.B. ( 1992). Equating tests under the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 87-96.
2.
Baker, F.B. ( 1993). Equating tests under the nominal response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 239-251.
3.
Bock, R.D., & Aitkin, M. ( 1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443-459.
4.
Bock, R.D., & Lieberman, M. ( 1970). Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items . Psychometrika, 35, 179-197.
5.
Bock, R.D., & Zimowski, M.F. (1997). Multiple group IRT. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 433-448). New York: Springer.
6.
Cohen, A.S., & Kim, S.-H. (1998). An investigation of linking methods under the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 116-130.
7.
Divgi, D.R. ( 1985). A minimum chi-square method for developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied PsychologicalMeasurement , 9, 413-415.
8.
Haebara, T. ( 1980). Equating logistic ability scales by a weighted least squares method. Japanese Psychological Research, 22, 144-149.
9.
Hanson, B.A., & Béguin, A.A. (2002). Obtaining a common scale for item response theory item parameters using separate versus concurrent estimation in the common-item equating design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 3-24.
10.
Kendall, M., & Stuart, A. ( 1977). The adνanced theory of statistics (4th ed., Vol. 1). New York: Macmillan.
11.
Kim, J., & Hanson, B.A. ( 2002). Test equating under the multiple-choice model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 255-270.
12.
Kim, S. ( 2008, March). A sample-based method for obtaining the full νariance-coνariance matrix of marginal maximum likelihood item parameter estimators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York.
13.
Kim, S. ( 2009). ST-LSE: A computer program for scale transformation using least squares estmiation of IRT linking coefficients. Daegu, South Korea: Author.
14.
Kim, S., & Kolen, M.J. ( 2004). STUIRT: A computer program for scale transformation under unidimensional item response theory models. Iowa City: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.education.uiowa.edu/casma
15.
Kim, S., & Kolen, M.J. ( 2006). Robustness to format effects of IRT linking methods for mixed-format tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 357-381.
16.
Kim, S., & Kolen, M.J. ( 2007). Effects on scale linking of different definitions of criterion functions for the IRT characteristic curve methods. Journal of Educational and Behaνioral Statistics, 32, 371-397.
17.
Kim, S., & Lee, W. ( 2006). An extension of four IRT linking methods for mixed-format tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 53-76.
18.
Kim, S.-H., & Cohen, A.S. ( 1998). A comparison of linking and concurrent calibration under item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 131-143.
19.
Kolen, M.J., & Brennan, R.L. ( 2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
20.
Lord, F.M. ( 1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Loyd, B.H., & Hoover, H.D. ( 1980). Vertical equating using the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17, 179-193.
22.
Marco, G.L. ( 1977). Item characteristic curve solutions to three intractable testing problems. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 139-160.
Ogasawara, H. ( 2000). Asymptotic standard errors of IRT equating coefficients using moments. Economic Reνiew (Otaru Uniνersity of Commerce), 15, 1-23.
25.
Ogasawara, H. ( 2001a). Least squares estimation of item response theory linking coefficients. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 373-383.
26.
Ogasawara, H. ( 2001b). Standard errors of item response theory equating/linking by response function methods. Applied Psychological Measurement , 25, 53-67.
27.
Roberts, J.S., Bao, H., Huang, C., & Gagne, P. ( 2003, April). Exploring alternatiνe characteristic curνe approaches to linking parameter estimates from the generalized partial credit model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago .
28.
Samejima, F. ( 1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, No. 17.
29.
Samejima, F. ( 1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85-100). New York: Springer-Verlag.
30.
Stocking, M.L., & Lord, F.M. ( 1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 201-210.
31.
Thissen, D. ( 1991). MULTILOG: Multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
