Dennis, J.E., & Schnabel, R.B. (1996). Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
2.
Free Software Foundation. (2007). GNU lesser general public license. Boston: Free Software Foundation.
3.
Haebara, T. ( 1980). Equating logistic ability scales by a weighted least squares method. Japanese Psychological Research, 22(3), 144-149.
4.
Kim, S., & Kolen, M.J. ( 2007). Effects on scale linking of different definitions of criterion functions for the IRT characteristic curve methods. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32(4), 371-397.
5.
Kolen, M.J., & Brennan, R.L. ( 2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
6.
Linacre, J.M. ( 2008). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS/MINISTEP Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago: Winsteps.com
7.
Loyd, B.H., & Hoover, H.D. ( 1980). Vertical equating using the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17(3), 179-193.
8.
Marco, G.L. ( 1977). Item characteristic curve solutions to three intractable testing problems. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14(2), 139-160.
9.
Michaelides, M.P., & Haertel, E.H. ( 2004). Sampling of common items: An unrecognized source of error in test equating. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE), National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), and Graduate School of Education & Information Studies University of California, Los Angeles.
10.
Silverman, B.W. ( 1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall/ CRC.
11.
Stocking, M.L., & Lord, F.M. ( 1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(2), 201-210.
12.
Sturges, H.A. ( 1926). The choice of a class interval. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 21(153), 65-66.
13.
Tsai, T., Hanson, B.A., Kolen, M.J., & Forsyth, a. R. A. (2001). A comparison of bootstrap standard errors of IRT equating methods for the common-item nonequivalent groups design. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 17-30.