Davidian-curve item response theory (DC-IRT) is introduced, evaluated with simulations, and illustrated using data from the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality Entitlement scale. DC-IRT is a method for fitting unidimensional IRT models with maximum marginal likelihood estimation, in which the latent density is estimated, simultaneously with the item parameters of logistic item response functions, as a Davidian curve. Simulations compare DC-IRT with Ramsay-curve IRT (RC-IRT) and the empirical histogram method (EHM) for a normal, bimodal, or skewed latent distribution. When the latent density was nonnormal, any of the three density estimation methods improved on the normal model. Both DC-IRT and RC-IRT produced more-accurate results than did the EHM.
Andersen, E.B., & Madsen, M. (1977). Estimating the parameters of a latent population distribution. Psychometrika, 42, 357-374.
2.
Baker, F.B., & Subkoviak, M.J. (1981). Analysis of test results via log-linear models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 503-515.
3.
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 395-479). Reading, MA: Addison & Wesley.
4.
Bock, R.D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more latent categories. Psychometrika, 37, 29-51.
5.
Bock, R.D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika , 46, 443-459.
6.
Bock, R.D., & Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 35, 179-197.
7.
Clark, L. (1996). SNAP manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
Cressie, N., & Holland, P.W. (1983). Characterizing the manifest probabilities of latent trait models. Psychometrika, 48, 129-141.
9.
Davidian, M., & Gallant, A.R. (1993). The nonlinear mixed effects model with a smooth random effects density. Biometrika, 80, 475-488.
10.
Davidian, M., & Giltinan, D.M. (1995). Nonlinear models of repeated measurement data. London: Chapman & Hall.
11.
de Boor, C. (2001). A practical guide to splines (Rev. ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12.
Engelen, R.J.H. (1989). Parameter estimation in the logistic item response model. Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Twente.
13.
Ferrando, P.J. (2003). The accuracy of the E, N and P trait estimates: An empirical study using the EPQ-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 665-679.
Hannan, E.J. (1987). Rational transfer function approximation. Statistical Science, 2, 135-161.
16.
Hill, C.D. (2004). Precision of parameter estimates for the graded item response model. Unpublished masters thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
17.
Holland, P.W. (1990). On the sampling theory foundations of item response theory models. Psychometrika, 55, 577-601.
18.
Kolmogorov, A. (1933). Sulla Determinazione Empirica di una Legge di Distributione. Giornale dell'Istituto Italiano degli Attuari , 4, 1-11.
19.
Lord, F.N., & Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20.
Mellenbergh, G.J., & Vijn, P. (1981). The Rasch model as a log-linear model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 369-376.
21.
Mislevy, R. (1984). Estimating latent distributions. Psychometrika, 49, 359-381.
22.
Mislevy, R., & Bock, D. (1990). BILOG 3: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models [Computer software]. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.
23.
Ramsay, J.O. (2000). Differential equation models for statistical functions . Canadian Journal of Statistics, 28, 225-240.
24.
Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85-100). New York: Springer-Verlag.
25.
Schmitt, J.E., Mehta, P.D., Aggen, S.H., Kubarych, T.S., & Neale, M.C. (2006). Semi- nonparametric methods for detecting latent nonnormality: A fusion of latent trait and ordered latent class modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 427-443.
26.
Silverman, B.W. (1982). On the estimation of a probability density function by the maximum penalized likelihood method. Annals of Statistics , 10, 795-810.
27.
Smirnov, N. (1939). Sur les Écarts de la Courbe de Distribution Empirique . Recueil Mathématique, 6, 3-26.
28.
Stroud, A.H. (1974). Numerical quadrature and solution of ordinary differential equations. New York: Springer-Verlag.
29.
Thissen, D. (1991). MULTILOG user's guide: Multiple categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory. Chicago: Scientific Software.
30.
Thissen, D., & Mooney, J.A. (1989). Log-linear item response models, with applications to data from social surveys. Sociological Methodology, 19, 299-330.
31.
Thurstone, L.L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 278-286.
32.
Woods, C.M. (2004). Item response theory with estimation of the latent population distribution using spline-based densities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
33.
Woods, C.M. (2006). Ramsay-curve item response theory to detect and correct for nonnormal latent variables. Psychological Methods , 11, 253-270.
Woods, C.M., & Thissen, D. (2004). RCLOG v.1: Software for item response theory parameter estimation with the latent population distribution represented using spline-based densities (Technical Report). Chapel Hill, NC: L. L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory.
36.
Woods, C.M., & Thissen, D. (2006). Item response theory with estimation of the latent population distribution using spline-based densities. Psychometrika , 71, 281-301.
37.
Zhang, D., & Davidian, M. (2001). Linear mixed models with flexible distributions of random effects for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 57, 795-802.
38.
Zimowski, M., Muraki, E., Mislevy, R., & Bock, D. (2003). BILOG-MG 3 [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International .
