The authors present a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) parameter estimation procedure for the generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM) and compare it to the marginal maximum likelihood (MML) approach implemented in the GGUM2000 computer program, using simulated and real personality data. In the simulation study, test length, number of response options, and sample size were manipulated. Results indicate that the two methods are comparable in terms of item parameter estimation accuracy. Although the MML estimates exhibit slightly smaller bias than MCMC estimates, they also show greater variability, which results in larger root mean squared errors. Of the two methods, only MCMC provides reasonable standard error estimates for all items.
Andrich, D. (1988). The application of an unfolding model of the PIRT type to the measurement of attitude. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 33-51.
2.
Andrich, D., & Luo, G. (1993). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding dichotomous single-stimulus responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 253-276.
3.
Baker, F. B. (1992). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker.
4.
Chernyshenko, O. S. (2002). Applications of ideal point approaches to scale construction and scoring in personality measurement: The development of a six-faceted measure of conscientiousness. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
5.
Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., Chan, K. Y., Drasgow, F., & Williams, B. A. (2001). Fitting item response theory models to two personality inventories: Issues and insights. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 523-562.
6.
Chib, S., & Greenberg, E. (1995). Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The American Statistician, 49, 327-335.
7.
de la Torre, J. (2003). Improving the accuracy of item response theory parameter estimates through simultaneous estimation and incorporation of ancillary variables. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
8.
de la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. (2004). Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika69, 333-393
9.
Doornik, J. A. (2003). Object-oriented matrix programming using Ox (Version 3.1) [Computer software]. London: Timberlake Consultants Press.
10.
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences (with discussion). Statistical Science, 7, 457-511.
11.
Gilks, R. W., Richardson, S., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1996). Introducing Markov chain Monte Carlo. In R. W. Gilks, S. Richardson, & D. J. Spiegelhalter (Eds.), Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice (pp. 1-19). London: Chapman & Hall.
12.
Hoijtink, H. (1991). The measurement of latent traits by proximity items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 153-169.
13.
Johnson, M. S., & Junker, B. W. (2003). Using data augmentation and Markov chain Monte Carlo for the estimation of unfolding item response models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28, 195-230.
14.
Kim, S.-H. (2001). An evaluation of a Markov chain Monte Carlo method for the Rasch model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 163-176.
15.
Patz, R. J., & Junker, B. W. (1999a). Application and extensions of MCMC in IRT: Multiple item types, missing data, and rated responses. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 342-366.
16.
Patz, R. J., & Junker, B. W. (1999b). A straightforward approach to Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for item response theory models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 146-178.
17.
Roberts, J. S. (2001). GGUM2000: Estimation of parameters in the generalized graded unfolding model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 38.
18.
Roberts, J. S., Donoghue, J. R., & Laughlin, J. E. (2000). A general item response theory model for unfolding unidimensional polytomous responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 3-32.
19.
Roberts, J. S., Laughlin, J. E., & Wedell, D. H. (1999). Validity issues in the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 211-233.
20.
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F., & Williams, B. A. (in press). Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?Journal of Applied Psychology.
21.
Stark, S., & Drasgow, F. (2002). An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 208-227.
22.
Swaminathan, H., & Gifford, J. A. (1986). Bayesian estimation in the three-parameter logistic model. Psychometrika, 51, 589-601.
23.
Tierney, L. (1994). Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions (with discussion). Annals of Statistics, 22, 1701-1762.
24.
Verhelst, N. D., & Verstralen, H. H. F. M. (1993). A stochastic unfolding model derived from a partial credit model. Kwantitative Methoden, 42, 73-92.
25.
Zeng, L. (1997). Implementation of marginal Bayesian estimation with four-parameter beta prior distributions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 143-156.
