“Rassling the Hog”: The Influence of Correlated Item Error on Internal Consistency,Classical Reliability,and Congeneric Reliability

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.

Carmines, E. G. , & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobservable variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement (pp. 65-115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

Feldt, L. S. (2002). Estimating the internal consistency reliability of tests composed of testlets varying in length. Applied Measurement in Education, 15(1), 33-48.

Green, S. B. , & Herschberger, S. L. (2000). Correlated errors in true score models and their effect on coefficient alpha. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(2), 251-270.

Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10(4), 255-282.

Guttman, L. (1953). Reliability formulas that do not assume experimental independence. Psychometrika, 18(3), 225-239.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109-133.

Jöreskog, K. G. , & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user’s guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

Komaroff, E. (1997). Effect of simultaneous violations of essential τ-equivalence and uncorrelated error on coefficientα. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(4), 337-348.

Lord, F. M. , & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores with contributions by Allan Birnbaum. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

McDonald, R. P. (1970). The theoretical foundations of common factor analysis, principal factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 1-21.

McDonald, R. P. (1981). The dimensionality of tests and items. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 100-117.

McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Miller, M. B. (1995). Coefficient alpha: A basic introduction from the perspectives of classical test theory and structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 2(3), 255-273.

Muthén, B. O. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29(1), 81-117.

Muthén, L. K. , & Muthén, B. O. (2001). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Author.

Novick, M. R. , & Lewis, C. (1967). Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika, 32(1), 1-13.

Nunnally, J. C. , & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Raykov, T. (1997a). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173-184.

Raykov, T. (1997b). Scale reliability, Cronbach’s coefficient alpha, and violations of essential tau-equivalence with fixed congeneric components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(4), 329-353.

Raykov, T. (1998a). A method for obtaining standard errors and confidence intervals of composite reliability for congeneric items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22(4), 369-374.

Raykov, T. (1998b). Coefficient alpha and composite reliability with interrelated nonhomogeneous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22(4), 375-385.

Raykov, T. (2001a). Bias of coefficient α for fixed congeneric measures with correlated errors. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(1), 69-76.

Raykov, T. (2001b). Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 315-323.

Raykov, T. (2002). Analytic estimation of standard error and confidence interval for scale reliability. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37(1), 89-103.

Raykov, T. , & Penev, S. (2001). The problem of equivalent structural models: An individual residual perspective. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 297-321). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Raykov, T. , & Shrout, P. E. (2002). Reliability of scales with general structure: Point and interval estimation using a structural equation modeling approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 195-212.

Reuterberg, S.-E. , & Gustafsson, J.-E. (1992). Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability: Testing measurement model assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 795-811.

Rosenbaum, P. (1988). Item bundles. Psychometrika, 53, 349-359.

Rozeboom, W. W. (1966). Foundations of the theory of prediction. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

Rozeboom, W. W. (1989). The reliability of a linear composite of nonequivalent subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13(3), 277-283.

Shevlin, M. , Miles, J. N. V. , Davies, M. N. O. , & Walker, S. (2000). Coefficient alpha: A useful indicator of reliability? Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 229-237.

Tuerlinckx, F. , & De Boeck, P. (2004). Models for residual dependencies. In P. De Boeck & M. Wilson (Eds.), Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. New York: Springer.

Wainer, H. , & Kiely, G. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 185-201.

Wilson, M. , & Adams, R. J. (1995). Rasch models for item bundles. Psychometrika, 60(2), 181-198.

Zimmerman, D. W. , & Williams, R. H. (1980). Is classical test theory ‘robust’ under violations of the assumption of uncorrelated errors? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34(3), 227-237.

Zimmerman, D. W. , Zumbo, B. D. , & Lalonde, C. (1993). Coefficient alpha as an estimate of test reliability under violations of two assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 33-49.

Zumbo, B. D. , & Rupp, A. (2004). Responsible modeling of measurement data for appropriate inferences: Important advances in reliability and validity theory. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.