Coefficient H is used as an index of scalability in nonparametric item response theory (NIRT). It indicates the degree to which a set of items rank orders examinees. Theoretical sampling distributions, however, have only been derived asymptotically and only under restrictive conditions. Bootstrap methods offer an alternative possibility to estimate the variance of H. Ordered latent class models allow a parameterization of NIRT models. The distribution of H, given the estimates of such a model, also gives an impression of the stability of H. The distributions estimated under each of the methods are compared to the sampling distribution and to each other under several conditions.
Bayarri, M. J., & Berger, J. O. (2000). P values for composite null models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 1127-1142.
2.
Casella, G., & George, E. I. (1992). Explaining the Gibbs sampler. The American Statistician, 46, 167-174.
3.
Clogg, C. C. (1988). Latent class for measurement models. In R. Langeheine & J. Rost (Eds.), Latent trait and latent class models (pp. 173-205). New York: Plenum.
4.
Croon, M. A. (1990). Latent class analysis with ordered latent classes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 171-192.
5.
Croon, M. A. (1991). Investigating Mokken scalability of dichotomous items by means of ordinal latent class models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 315-331.
6.
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
7.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (1995). Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
8.
Grayson, D. A. (1988). Two-group classification in latent trait theory: Scores with monotone likelihood ratio. Psychometrika, 53, 383-392.
9.
Heinen, T. (1993). Discrete latent variable models. Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
10.
Hemker, B. T., Sijtsma, K., Molenaar, I. W., & Junker, B. W. (1997). Stochastic ordering using the latent and the sum score in polytomous IRT models. Psychometrika, 62, 331-347.
11.
Holland, P. W., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models. The Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523-1543.
12.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13.
Lindsay, B., Clogg, C. C., & Grego, J. (1991). Semi-parametric estimation in the Rasch model and related exponential response models, including a simple latent class model for item analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 96-107.
14.
Loevinger, J. (1948). The technique of homogenous tests compared with some aspects of scale analysis and factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 45, 507-530.
15.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Mokken, R. J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis: With applications in political research. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
17.
Mokken, R. J. (1997). Nonparametric models for dichotomous responses. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 351-367). New York: Springer.
18.
Molenaar, I. W. (1991). A weighted Loevinger H coefficient extending the Mokken scaling to multicategory items. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 37, 97-117.
19.
Molenaar, I. W. (1997). Nonparametric models for polytomous responses. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 369-380). New York: Springer.
20.
Molenaar, I. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2000). User’s manual MSP5 for windows: A program for Mokken scale analysis for polytomous items [Software manual]. Groningen, the Netherlands: iec ProGAMMA.
21.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 17, 100-114.
22.
Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W. (2002). Introduction to nonparametric item response theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Sijtsma, K., & Van der Ark, L. A. (2001). Progress in NIRT analysis of polytomous item scores: Dilemmas and practical solutions. In A. Boomsma, M. A. J. van der Duijn, & T. A. B. Snijders (Eds.), Essays on item response theory (pp. 297-318). New York: Springer.
24.
Van der Ark, L. A. (in press). Stochastic ordering of the latent trait by the sum score under various polytomous IRT models. Psychometrika.
25.
Van Onna, M. J. H. (2002). Bayesian estimation and model selection in ordered latent class models for polytomous items. Psychometrika, 67, 519-538.
26.
Van Onna, M. J. H. (2003). General and specific misfit of nonparametric IRT-models. In H. Yanai, A. Okada, K. Shigemasu, Y. Kano, & J. J. Meulman (Eds.), New developments in psychometrics: Proceedings of the International Meeting of the Psychometric Society (IMPS 2001) (pp. 239-246). Tokyo: Springer Verlag.
27.
Vermunt, J. K. (1997). LEM: A general program for the analysis of categorical data. Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University.
