The authors investigated the role of personality in everyday social comparisons. Participants were 133 students who completed the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised. For the following 2 weeks, they recorded their comparisons and positive and negative affect using the Rochester Social Comparison Record. Analysis using Hierarchical Linear Modeling showed that people high in Neuroticism reported a greater increase in positive affect after comparing downward than people low on the dimension. Furthermore, people high in Extraversion and low in Agreeableness compared downward more. People high in Openness compared upward more and reported less of a decrease in positive affect after making these comparisons. These findings are discussed in relation to downward comparison theory, the selective-priming model, and the attributes of the five personality dimensions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnold, C. L. (1992). An introduction to hierarchical linear models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 25, 58-90.
2.
Aspinwall, L. G. , & Taylor, S. E. (1993). Effects of social comparison direction, threat, and self-esteem on affect, self-evaluation, and expected success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 708-722.
3.
Bower, G. H. (1991). Mood congruity of social judgments. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Emotional and social judgment (pp. 31-53). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
4.
Bryk, A. S. , & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Bryk, A. S. , Raudenbush, S. W., Seltzer, M., & Congdon, R. (1988). An introduction to HLM: Computer program user’s guide (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Department of Education.
6.
Campbell, J. D. (1986). Similarity and uniqueness: The effects of attribute type, relevance, and individual differences in self-esteem and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 281-294.
7.
Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 51-69.
8.
Costa, P. T. , & McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
9.
Crano, W. D. , & Brewer, M. B. (1973). Principles of research in social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Crocker, J. , & Schwartz, I. (1985). Prejudice and in-group favoritism in minimal intergroup situation: Effects of self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 379-386.
11.
Eysenck, H. J. , & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1991). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS Adult). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
12.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
13.
Friend, R. M. , & Gilbert, J. (1973). Threat and fear of negative evaluation as determinants of locus of social comparison. Journal of Personality, 41, 328-340.
14.
Gibbons, F. X. (1986). Social comparison and depression: Company’s effect on misery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 140-148.
15.
Gibbons, F. X. , & Gerrard, M. (1989). Effects of upward and downward social comparison on mood states. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 14-31.
16.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Hogan, R. , Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 826-842). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18.
Lockwood, P. , & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 91-103.
19.
McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of Openness to Experience. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 826-842). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20.
Rogosa, D. , Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 726-748.
21.
Salovey, P. (1991). Social comparison processes in envy and jealousy. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 261-285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Schopenhauer, A. (1895). Studies in pessimism. New York: Boni and Liveright.
23.
Smith, R. H. , & Insko, C. A. (1987). Social comparison choice during ability evaluation: The effects of comparison publicity, performance feedback, and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 111-122.
24.
Suls, J. M. (1977). Social comparison theory and research: An overview from 1954. In J. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 1-19). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
25.
Suls, J. , & Miller, R. L. (Eds.). (1977). Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
26.
Suls, J. , & Wills, T. A. (Eds.). (1991). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Taylor, S. E. , & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
28.
VanderZee, K. , Buunk, B., & Sanderman, R. (1996). The relationship between social comparison processes and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 551-565.
29.
VanderZee, K. , Buunk, B., & Sanderman, R. (1998). Neuroticism and reactions to social comparison information among cancer patients. Journal of Personality, 66, 177-193.
30.
Watson, D. , & Clark, L. A. (1992). On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 441-476.
31.
Watson, D. , Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
32.
West, S. G. , & Hepworth, J. T. (1991). Statistical issues in the study of temporal data: Daily experiences. Journal of Personality, 59, 609-661.
33.
Wheeler, L. (1966). Motivation as a determinant of upward comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2(Suppl. 1), 27-31.
34.
Wheeler, L. , & Miyake, K. (1992). Social comparison in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 760-773.
35.
Wheeler, L. , & Reis, H. T. (1991). Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. Journal of Personality, 59, 339-354.
36.
Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271.
37.
Wills, T. A. (1991). Similarity and self-esteem in downward comparison. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 51-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
Wilson, S. R. , & Benner, L. A. (1971). The effects of self-esteem and situation upon comparison choices during ability evaluation. Sociometry, 34, 381-397.
39.
Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231-248.
40.
Wood, J. V. , & Taylor, K. L. (1991). Serving self-relevant goals through social comparison. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 23-46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
