An extension of the neosexism model based on the assumption that neosexism derives from experiences of upward mobility within the broader social structure of male-female relations was proposed and evaluated in a sample of 335 secretaries employed in a Canadian federal agency. It posited that the more women attempted to access nontraditional fields of work, the more they experienced discrimination. Personally experienced discriminatory barriers were related to feelings of collective relative deprivation. Moreover, the more women felt deprived on behalf of their group, the less they endorsed neosexist beliefs. Finally, a reverse effect was predicted between neosexism, collective relative deprivation, and responses to affirmative action and a pro-male bias in the evaluation of the competence of male and female managers. Support for this model was obtained by a structural equation modeling technique (EQS).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beaton, A. M. , Tougas, F., & Joly, S. (1996). Neosexism among male managers: Is it a matter of numbers?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 2189-2203.
2.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
3.
Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400-404.
4.
Bentler, P. M. , & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS for Windows user’s guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
5.
Bobo, L. (1983). White’s opposition to busing: Symbolic racism or realistic group’s conflict?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1196-1210.
6.
Bobo, L. (1988). Group conflict, prejudice, and the paradox of contemporary racial attitudes. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 85-114). New York: Plenum.
7.
Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Cameron, C. (1977). Sex-role attitudes. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Attitudes and opinions (pp. 339-359). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Campbell, B. , Schellenberg, E. G., & Senn, C. Y. (1997). Evaluating measures of contemporary sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 89-102.
10.
Glick, P. , & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
11.
Gurin, P. , & Markus, H. (1988). Group identity: The psychological mechanisms of durable salience. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 257-274.
12.
Hu, L. -T. , & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Hu, L. -T. , Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351-362.
14.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. Scott Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Jöreskog, K. G. , & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS.
16.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Kanter, R. M. (1987). Men and women of the corporation revisited. Management Review, 76, 14-16.
18.
Katz, I. , & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
19.
Kram, K. E. (1986). Mentoring in the workplace. In D. T. Hall & Associates (Eds.), Career development in organizations (pp. 160-201). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
La Du, T. J. , & Tanaka, J. S. (1989). Influence of sample size, estimation method and model specification on goodness-of-fit assessments in structural equation models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 625-635.
21.
MacCallum, R. C. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107-120.
22.
MacCallum, R. C. (1995). Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 16-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Marsh, H. W. , Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
24.
McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 91-125). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
25.
Morrison, A. M. , & Von Glinow, M. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200-208.
26.
Morrison, A. M. , White, R., & Van Velsor, E. (1987). Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America’s largest corporations?New York: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Noe, R. A. (1988). Women and mentoring: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 13, 65-78.
28.
Pettigrew, T. F. , & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75.
29.
Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In P. S. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 123-151). New York: Free Press.
31.
Sidanius, J. , Devereux, E., & Pratto, F. (1992). A comparison of symbolic racism theory and social dominance theory as explanations for racial policy attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 377-395.
32.
Simpson, S. , McCarrey, M., & Edwards, H. P. (1987). Relationship of supervisors’ sex-role stereotypes to performance evaluation of male and female subordinates in non-traditional jobs. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 4, 15-30.
33.
Swim, J. K. , Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214.
34.
Sztaba, T. I. , & Colwill, N. L. (1988). Secretarial and management students: Attitudes, attributes, and career choice considerations. Sex Roles, 9/10, 651-665.
35.
Tabachnick, B. G. , & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
36.
Taylor, D. M. , & McKirnan, D. J. (1984). A five-stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 291-300.
37.
Tougas, F. , Beaton, A. M., & Veilleux, F. (1991). Why women approve of affirmative action: The study of a predictive model. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 761-776.
38.
Tougas, F. , Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neo-sexism: Plus ça change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849.
39.
Tougas, F. , Crosby, F., Joly, S., & Pelchat, D. (1994). Men’s attitudes toward affirmative action: Justice and intergroup relations at the crossroads. Social Justice Research, 8, 57-71.
40.
Tucker, L. R. , & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 8, 1-12.
41.
Yoder, J. D. , Adams, J., Grove, S., & Priest, R. F. (1985). To teach is to learn: Overcoming tokenism with mentors. British Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 119-131.
